Cirrhosis and frailty assessment in elderly patients: A paradoxical result.
Aged
Body Mass Index
Cognitive Dysfunction
/ diagnosis
Comorbidity
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Frailty
/ epidemiology
Hepacivirus
/ isolation & purification
Hepatitis C
/ complications
Humans
Liver Cirrhosis
/ complications
Male
Nutrition Assessment
Prevalence
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
entrez:
9
1
2020
pubmed:
9
1
2020
medline:
22
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The frailty represents a key determinant of elderly clinical assessment, especially because it allows the identification of risk factors potentially modifiable by clinical and therapeutic interventions. The frailty assessment in elderly patients usually is made by using of Fried criteria. However, to assess the frailty in cirrhotic patients, multiple but different tools are used by researchers. Thus, we aimed to compare frailty prevalence in elderly patients with well-compensated liver cirrhosis and without cirrhosis, according to Fried criteria.Among 205 elderly patients screened, a total of 148 patients were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence/absence of well-compensated liver cirrhosis.After clinical examination with conventional scores of cirrhosis, all patients underwent anthropometric measurements, nutritional, biochemical, comorbidity, and cognitive performances. Frailty assessment was evaluated according to Fried frailty criteria.Unexpectedly, according to the Fried criteria, non-cirrhotic patients were frailer (14.2%) than well-compensated liver cirrhotic patients (7.5%). The most represented Fried criterion was the unintentional weight loss in non-cirrhotic patients (10.1%) compared to well-compensated liver cirrhotic patients (1.4%). Moreover, cumulative illness rating scale -G severity score was significantly and positively associated with frailty status (r = 0.234, P < .004). In a multivariate linear regression model, only female gender, body mass index and mini nutritional assessment resulted associated with frailty status, independently of other confounding variables.Despite the fact that elderly cirrhotic patients are considered to be frailer than the non-cirrhotic elderly patient, relying solely on "mere visual appearance," our data show that paradoxically non-cirrhotic elderly patients are frailer than elderly well-compensated liver cirrhotic patients. Thus, clinical implication of this finding is that frailty assessment performed in the well-compensated liver cirrhotic patient can identify those cirrhotic patients who may benefit from tailored interventions similarly to non-cirrhotic elderly patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31914020
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018501
pii: 00005792-202001100-00011
pmc: PMC6959886
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e18501Références
Depress Res Treat. 2018 Mar 01;2018:1797536
pubmed: 29686898
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62
pubmed: 23395245
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Sep 14;158(16):1789-95
pubmed: 9738608
J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):406-460
pubmed: 29653741
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Nov;95(5):1851-60
pubmed: 14555665
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Jan;43(4):411-31
pubmed: 18579155
Age Ageing. 2010 May;39(3):331-7
pubmed: 20219767
J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2016 Sep;20(3):46-50
pubmed: 27757387
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0215559
pubmed: 30978261
Transplantation. 2016 Dec;100(12):2656-2660
pubmed: 27495749
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007 Dec;19(6):457-64
pubmed: 18172367
J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Dec;13(10):881-9
pubmed: 19924348
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 15;369(7):678-9
pubmed: 23944316
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1163.e1-1163.e17
pubmed: 27886869
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1759-1767
pubmed: 27481305
Am J Transplant. 2014 Aug;14(8):1870-9
pubmed: 24935609
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;29(6):686-693
pubmed: 28195877
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(26):e3935
pubmed: 27367990
Arch Public Health. 2015 Apr 10;73(1):19
pubmed: 25866625
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7412-26
pubmed: 26139987
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan 17;2019:6757524
pubmed: 30792972
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Jun;12(5):289-99
pubmed: 20590901
Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31
pubmed: 30312372
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2018 Sep 10;8(3):306-320
pubmed: 30323831
Liver Transpl. 2012 Oct;18(10):1209-16
pubmed: 22740290
Hepatology. 2017 Mar;65(3):1044-1057
pubmed: 28027577
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Feb;20(2):183-187
pubmed: 30262439
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7
pubmed: 23764209
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Jun;30(6):866-872.e4
pubmed: 31053265
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1365-1375
pubmed: 31609228
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1768-1775
pubmed: 27575708
Circulation. 2014 Oct 14;130(16):1353-62
pubmed: 25095888
Clin Liver Dis. 2017 Aug;21(3):565-578
pubmed: 28689594
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;15(10):1492-1497
pubmed: 28400317
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;17(9):828-34
pubmed: 12221656
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Sep;29(9):1253-9
pubmed: 25246744
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Mar 14;15(1):51
pubmed: 28292292
Hepatology. 2017 Aug;66(2):564-574
pubmed: 28422306
Hepatology. 2015 Aug;62(2):584-90
pubmed: 25846824
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Jul;61(7):726-35
pubmed: 16870636
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):18
pubmed: 30701392
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Jul-Aug;60(125):1127-30
pubmed: 23425809
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb 7;23(5):899-905
pubmed: 28223735
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;49(8):690-6
pubmed: 25291348