Latent class analysis of sexual health markers among men and women participating in a British probability sample survey.
Sexual coercion
Sexual function
Sexual health
Sexual wellbeing
Sexually transmitted infection
Unplanned pregnancy
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jan 2020
09 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
16
04
2019
accepted:
18
11
2019
entrez:
10
1
2020
pubmed:
10
1
2020
medline:
2
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite known associations between different aspects of sexual health, it is not clear how patterning of adverse sexual health varies across the general population. A better understanding should contribute towards more effective problem identification, prevention and treatment. We sought to identify different clusters of sexual health markers in a general population, along with their socio-demographic, health and lifestyle correlates. Data came from men (N = 5113) and women (N = 7019) aged 16-74 who reported partnered sexual activity in the past year in Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, undertaken in 2010-2012. Latent class analysis used 18 self-reported variables relating to adverse sexual health outcomes (STI and unplanned pregnancy, non-volitional sex, and sexual function problems). Correlates included socio-demographics, early debut, alcohol/drug use, depression, and satisfaction/distress with sex life. Four classes were found for men (labelled Good Sexual Health 83%, Wary Risk-takers 4%, Unwary Risk-takers 4%, Sexual Function Problems 9%); six for women (Good Sexual Health 52%, Wary Risk-takers 2%, Unwary Risk-takers 7%, Low Interest 29%, Sexual Function Problems 7%, Highly Vulnerable 2%). Regardless of gender, Unwary Risk-takers reported lower STI/HIV risk perception and more condomless sex than Wary Risk-takers, but both were more likely to report STI diagnosis than Good Sexual Health classes. Highly Vulnerable women reported abortion, STIs and functional problems, and more sexual coercion than other women. Distinct socio-demographic profiles differentiated higher-risk classes from Good Sexual Health classes, with depression, alcohol/drug use, and early sexual debut widely-shared correlates of higher-risk classes. Females in higher-risk classes, and men with functional problems, evaluated their sex lives more negatively than those with Good Sexual Health. A greater prevalence and diversity of poor sexual health appears to exist among women than men in Britain, with more consistent effects on women's subjective sexual well-being. Shared health and lifestyle characteristics of higher-risk groups suggest widespread benefits of upstream interventions. Several groups could benefit from tailored interventions: men and women who underestimate their STI/HIV risk exposure, women distressed by low interest in sex, and women experiencing multiple adverse outcomes. Distinctive socio-demographic profiles should assist with identification and targeting.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite known associations between different aspects of sexual health, it is not clear how patterning of adverse sexual health varies across the general population. A better understanding should contribute towards more effective problem identification, prevention and treatment. We sought to identify different clusters of sexual health markers in a general population, along with their socio-demographic, health and lifestyle correlates.
METHODS
METHODS
Data came from men (N = 5113) and women (N = 7019) aged 16-74 who reported partnered sexual activity in the past year in Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, undertaken in 2010-2012. Latent class analysis used 18 self-reported variables relating to adverse sexual health outcomes (STI and unplanned pregnancy, non-volitional sex, and sexual function problems). Correlates included socio-demographics, early debut, alcohol/drug use, depression, and satisfaction/distress with sex life.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Four classes were found for men (labelled Good Sexual Health 83%, Wary Risk-takers 4%, Unwary Risk-takers 4%, Sexual Function Problems 9%); six for women (Good Sexual Health 52%, Wary Risk-takers 2%, Unwary Risk-takers 7%, Low Interest 29%, Sexual Function Problems 7%, Highly Vulnerable 2%). Regardless of gender, Unwary Risk-takers reported lower STI/HIV risk perception and more condomless sex than Wary Risk-takers, but both were more likely to report STI diagnosis than Good Sexual Health classes. Highly Vulnerable women reported abortion, STIs and functional problems, and more sexual coercion than other women. Distinct socio-demographic profiles differentiated higher-risk classes from Good Sexual Health classes, with depression, alcohol/drug use, and early sexual debut widely-shared correlates of higher-risk classes. Females in higher-risk classes, and men with functional problems, evaluated their sex lives more negatively than those with Good Sexual Health.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A greater prevalence and diversity of poor sexual health appears to exist among women than men in Britain, with more consistent effects on women's subjective sexual well-being. Shared health and lifestyle characteristics of higher-risk groups suggest widespread benefits of upstream interventions. Several groups could benefit from tailored interventions: men and women who underestimate their STI/HIV risk exposure, women distressed by low interest in sex, and women experiencing multiple adverse outcomes. Distinctive socio-demographic profiles should assist with identification and targeting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31914970
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7959-7
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-7959-7
pmc: PMC6950902
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0701757
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SPHSU18
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SPHSU11
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00022/3
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12017/11
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Sex Med. 2006 Jul;3(4):589-595
pubmed: 16839314
AIDS Care. 2019 Jun;31(6):675-680
pubmed: 30318900
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Oct;36(5):676-86
pubmed: 17192831
Sex Health. 2014 Nov;11(5):472-80
pubmed: 25377000
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Apr;29(6):1111-31
pubmed: 24255063
Lancet. 2017 Sep 9;390(10099):1014-1015
pubmed: 28877852
Sex Transm Infect. 2005 Oct;81(5):364
pubmed: 16199731
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 May;44(4):857-71
pubmed: 25808720
Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):71-8
pubmed: 23230075
J Sex Med. 2018 Sep;15(9):1336-1349
pubmed: 30224021
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Feb;45(2):403-14
pubmed: 25408498
Lancet. 2013 Nov 30;382(9907):1781-94
pubmed: 24286784
Struct Equ Modeling. 2013 Jan;20(1):1-26
pubmed: 25419096
AIDS Behav. 2007 Mar;11(2):263-70
pubmed: 16791527
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Feb;46(2):465-473
pubmed: 27757732
Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):866-7
pubmed: 24607094
J Sex Med. 2010 Jul;7(7):2458-68
pubmed: 20456625
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):133-44
pubmed: 25624001
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jun;148(2-3):188-95
pubmed: 23260381
Lancet. 2013 Nov 30;382(9907):1807-16
pubmed: 24286786
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Mar;90(2):84-9
pubmed: 24277881
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Feb;45(2):315-27
pubmed: 25391583
J Sex Med. 2009 Dec;6(12):3364-75
pubmed: 19758287
Lancet. 2013 Nov 30;382(9907):1759-62
pubmed: 24286782
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 13;7(9):e016942
pubmed: 28903968
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Aug;55(4):545-57
pubmed: 12188462
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Oct;47(7):2071-2080
pubmed: 29541914
J Sex Med. 2011 May;8(5):1404-10
pubmed: 21324092
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 18;16(1):1170
pubmed: 27863525
Am J Public Health. 2008 Jan;98(1):155-61
pubmed: 18048793
Lancet. 2013 Nov 30;382(9907):1795-806
pubmed: 24286785
AIDS Care. 2009 Mar;21(3):284-93
pubmed: 19031304
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Nov;28(16):3149-70
pubmed: 23711989
J Sex Med. 2012 Jun;9(6):1497-507
pubmed: 22462756
Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Jun;45(6):387-393
pubmed: 29465677
Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):867
pubmed: 24607096
J Sex Med. 2008 Jul;5(7):1681-93
pubmed: 18410300
J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):144-52
pubmed: 26953829
Lancet. 2013 Nov 30;382(9907):1845-55
pubmed: 24286789
Women Health. 2002;36(4):69-84
pubmed: 12555803
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177922
pubmed: 28542366
J Sex Med. 2011 Sep;8(9):2420-30
pubmed: 21676186
Lancet. 2013 Nov 30;382(9907):1817-29
pubmed: 24286787
J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Aug 27;18:20221
pubmed: 26318960
J Sex Res. 2017 Jan;54(1):91-104
pubmed: 26891245
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 May;58(5):426-33
pubmed: 15082745
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 27;10(7):e0132847
pubmed: 26214829
Eur J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;27(6):409-18
pubmed: 22711585
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Apr 15;161(8):774-80
pubmed: 15800270
Int J STD AIDS. 2014 Nov;25(13):949-55
pubmed: 24671715
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Jan;28(1):48-66
pubmed: 17462798
Prev Sci. 2013 Apr;14(2):157-68
pubmed: 21318625
J Sex Med. 2008 Oct;5(10):2291-9
pubmed: 18638008
Ann Fam Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;8(4):348-53
pubmed: 20644190
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Feb;93(1):32-38
pubmed: 27388457
EClinicalMedicine. 2018 Aug-Sep;2-3:29-36
pubmed: 30320305
Contraception. 2010 Apr;81(4):316-22
pubmed: 20227548
J Sex Marital Ther. 2008;34(4):291-7; discussion 298-307
pubmed: 18576229
Arch Sex Behav. 2006 Apr;35(2):145-61
pubmed: 16752118
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Jan;37(1):54-60
pubmed: 22430304
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 23;6(3):e010521
pubmed: 27009148