Tumour and pelvic lymph node metabolic activity on FDG-PET/CT to stratify patients for para-aortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer.


Journal

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 04 09 2019
accepted: 10 12 2019
pubmed: 10 1 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 10 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of our study was to comprehensively evaluate the most valuable metabolic parameters of cervical tumours and pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) by FDG-PET/CT to predict para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis and stratify patients for surgical staging. The study included patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, negative PALN uptake on preoperative FDG-PET/CT, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Two senior nuclear medicine physicians expert in gynaecologic oncology reviewed all PET/CT exams, and extracted tumour SUVmax, MTV, and TLG, as well as PLN. Prognostic parameters of PALN involvement were identified using ROC curves and logistic regression analysis. One hundred and twenty-five consecutive locally advanced cervical cancer patients were included. The FDG-PET/CT false-negative rate was, respectively, 27.7% (13/47) and 5.1% (4/78) in patients with and without FDG-PET/CT PLN uptake. The AUC of cervical tumour size, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG was, respectively, 0.75 (0.62-0.87), 0.59 (0.44-0.76), 0.75 (0.60-0.90), and 0.71 (0.56-0.86). The AUC of PLN size, SUVmax, SUVmean, PLN SUVmax/Tumour SUVmax ratio, MTV, and TLG was, respectively, 0.57 (0.37-0.78), 0.82 (0.68-0.95), 0.77 (0.61-0.94), 0.85 (0.72-0.98), 0.69 (0.51-0.87), and 0.74 (0.57-0.91). The metabolic parameter showing the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity to predict PALN involvement was the ratio between PLN and tumour SUVmax. The risk of PALN metastasis in FDG-PET/CT negative PLN patients is very low, so para-aortic lymphadenectomy does not seem justified. In patients with preoperative PLN uptake on FDG-PET/CT, surgical staging led to treatment modification in more than 25% of cases and should therefore be performed. Patients with more than one positive PLN and high PLN metabolic activity are at high risk of para-aortic extension and recurrence. Further prospective evaluation is required to consider intensified treatment modalities without prior PALN dissection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31915897
doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04659-z
pii: 10.1007/s00259-019-04659-z
doi:

Substances chimiques

Radiopharmaceuticals 0
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 0Z5B2CJX4D

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1252-1260

Références

Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):e212-20
pubmed: 22554549
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD008217
pubmed: 23543561
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 20;31(24):3026-33
pubmed: 23857967
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0220080
pubmed: 31318962
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 1;26(34):5654-5; author reply 5655-7
pubmed: 18981456
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jun;127(3):404-416
pubmed: 29728273
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Nov;91(2):326-31
pubmed: 14599862
Cancer. 2010 Mar 15;116(6):1469-75
pubmed: 20108309
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;137(1):40-6
pubmed: 25641567
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Dec 1;42(5):1015-23
pubmed: 9869224
J Glob Oncol. 2016 May 25;2(5):311-340
pubmed: 28717717
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1678-85
pubmed: 21444871
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(9):e2992
pubmed: 26945420
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Apr;89(1):160-7
pubmed: 12694671
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Apr;41(4):674-81
pubmed: 24233005
Clin Nucl Med. 2016 Jan;41(1):34-40
pubmed: 26505856
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 8;8(31):51840-51847
pubmed: 28881693
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Sep;44(10):1721-1731
pubmed: 28409221
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Nov;95 Suppl 1:S43-103
pubmed: 17161167
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2302-9
pubmed: 21347790
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jul;46(7):1551-1559
pubmed: 30729273
Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):1954-63
pubmed: 18338811
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv72-iv83
pubmed: 28881916
BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):1089-1094
pubmed: 28128517
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2014 Sep-Oct;33(5):268-73
pubmed: 25018135
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Feb;120(2):270-4
pubmed: 21109300
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Jan;26(1):169-75
pubmed: 26569062
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1225-1230
pubmed: 29782361
Clin Nucl Med. 2018 Nov;43(11):793-801
pubmed: 30153151
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Apr;97(1):183-91
pubmed: 15790456
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jul;23(6):1104-10
pubmed: 23792605
Oncologist. 2011;16(7):1021-7
pubmed: 21659610
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):328-54
pubmed: 25452219
Cancer. 2007 Oct 15;110(8):1738-44
pubmed: 17786947
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Oct;44(11):1862-1869
pubmed: 28534183

Auteurs

A Martinez (A)

Surgical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer -Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France. Martinez.alejandra@iuct-oncopole.fr.
Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR, 1037, Toulouse, France. Martinez.alejandra@iuct-oncopole.fr.

M Voglimacci (M)

Surgical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer -Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

A Lusque (A)

Biostatistics Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

A Ducassou (A)

Radiotherapy Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

L Gladieff (L)

Medical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

N Dupuis (N)

Surgical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer -Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

M A Angeles (MA)

Surgical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer -Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

C Martinez (C)

Surgical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer -Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR, 1037, Toulouse, France.

Y Tanguy Le Gac (Y)

Gynecology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

E Chantalat (E)

Gynecology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

A Hitzel (A)

Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

F Courbon (F)

Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

G Ferron (G)

Surgical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer -Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR, 1037, Toulouse, France.

E Gabiache (E)

Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH