Daily localization of partial breast irradiation patients with three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.
Breast neoplasms
Daily setup
Three-dimensional imaging
partial breast radiotherapy
Journal
Radiation oncology journal
ISSN: 2234-1900
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101577577
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
16
01
2019
accepted:
21
10
2019
entrez:
11
1
2020
pubmed:
11
1
2020
medline:
11
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate localization of the lumpectomy cavity during accelerated partial breast radiation (APBR) is essential for daily setup to ensure the prescribed dose encompasses the target and avoids unnecessary irradiation to surrounding normal tissues. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) allows direct visualization of the lumpectomy cavity without additional radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of 3D-US in daily target localization for APBR. Forty-seven patients with stage I breast cancer who underwent breast conserving surgery were treated with a 2-week course of APBR. Patients with visible lumpectomy cavities on high quality 3D-US images were included in this analysis. Prior to each treatment, X-ray and 3D-US images were acquired and compared to images from simulation to confirm accurate position and determine shifts. Volume change of the lumpectomy cavity was determined daily with 3D-US. A total of 118 images of each modality from 12 eligible patients were analyzed. The average change in cavity volume was 7.8% (range, -24.1% to 14.4%) on 3D-US from simulation to the end-of-treatment. Based on 3D-US, significantly larger shifts were necessary compared to portal films in all three dimensions: anterior/posterior (p = 7E-11), left/right (p = 0.002), and superior/inferior (p = 0.004). Given that the lumpectomy cavity is not directly visible via X-ray images, accurate positioning may not be fully achieved by X-ray images. Therefore, when the lumpectomy cavity is visible on US, 3D-US can be considered as an alternative to X-ray imaging during daily positioning for selected patients treated with APBR, thus avoiding additional exposure to ionizing radiation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31918463
pii: roj.2019.00052
doi: 10.3857/roj.2019.00052
pmc: PMC6952713
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
259-264Références
Radiat Oncol. 2011 May 09;6:45
pubmed: 21554697
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Oct 1;60(2):484-92
pubmed: 15380583
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 1;67(5):1299-308
pubmed: 17275202
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Feb 7;60(3):R77-114
pubmed: 25592664
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):39-45
pubmed: 20621425
Radiology. 2001 Apr;219(1):203-6
pubmed: 11274557
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Feb 1;34(3):579-84
pubmed: 8621281
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Feb 1;55(2):302-11
pubmed: 12527042
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Sep 1;69(1):41-8
pubmed: 17707265
Cancer. 2003 Feb 15;97(4):905-9
pubmed: 12569589
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):375-83
pubmed: 18692322
Radiother Oncol. 2004 Jul;72(1):61-6
pubmed: 15236875