Advances in the thermo-chemical production of hydrogen from biomass and residual wastes: Summary of recent techno-economic analyses.

Biomass Gasification Hydrogen Municipal solid waste Pyrolysis Reforming Syngas

Journal

Bioresource technology
ISSN: 1873-2976
Titre abrégé: Bioresour Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9889523

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 30 09 2019
revised: 01 12 2019
accepted: 02 12 2019
pubmed: 11 1 2020
medline: 28 1 2020
entrez: 11 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This article outlines the prospects and challenges of hydrogen production from biomass and residual wastes, such as municipal solid waste. Recent advances in gasification and pyrolysis followed by reforming are discussed. The review finds that the thermal efficiency of hydrogen from gasification is ~50%. The levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) from biomass varies from ~2.3-5.2 USD/kg at feedstock processing scales of 10 MWth to ~2.8-3.4 USD/kg at scales above 250 MWth. Preliminary estimates are that the LCOH from residual wastes could be in the range of ~1.4-4.8 USD/kg, depending upon the waste gate fee and project scale. The main barriers to development of waste to hydrogen projects include: waste pre-treatment, technology maturity, syngas conditioning, the market for clean hydrogen, policies to incentivize pioneer projects and technology competitiveness. The main opportunity is to produce low cost clean hydrogen, which is competitive with alternative production routes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31918971
pii: S0960-8524(19)31787-0
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122557
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Solid Waste 0
Hydrogen 7YNJ3PO35Z

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

122557

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

M Shahabuddin (M)

Department of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia.

Bhavya B Krishna (BB)

Academy of Scientific and Innovation Research (AcSIR) at CSIR Indian Institute of Petroleum (IIP), Dehradun 248005, Uttarakhand, India; Materials Resource Efficiency Division (MRED), CSIR-Indian Institute of Petroleum (IIP), Dehradun 248005, Uttarakhand, India.

Thallada Bhaskar (T)

Academy of Scientific and Innovation Research (AcSIR) at CSIR Indian Institute of Petroleum (IIP), Dehradun 248005, Uttarakhand, India; Materials Resource Efficiency Division (MRED), CSIR-Indian Institute of Petroleum (IIP), Dehradun 248005, Uttarakhand, India.

Greg Perkins (G)

Martin Parry Technology, Brisbane 4001, Australia; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia. Electronic address: g.perkins@uq.edu.au.

Articles similaires

India Carbon Sequestration Environmental Monitoring Carbon Biomass
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Ethiopia Conservation of Natural Resources Environmental Monitoring Soil Soil Erosion
Cities China Government Conservation of Natural Resources Humans

Classifications MeSH