Clinical aspects of sublingual immunotherapy tablets and drops.


Journal

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
ISSN: 1534-4436
Titre abrégé: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9503580

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 11 11 2019
revised: 17 12 2019
accepted: 27 12 2019
pubmed: 11 1 2020
medline: 7 7 2020
entrez: 11 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is administered via tablets (SLIT-T) or liquid drops (SLIT-D). In North America, currently 4 SLIT-T formulations are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for allergy immunotherapy, and SLIT-D is an off-label use of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) extracts. To compare and contrast aspects of SLIT-T and SLIT-D, including physical characteristics, mechanism of action, dosing, efficacy, safety, adherence, and cost. PubMed literature review (no limits), product prescribing information, and manufacturer websites. Publications related to physical characteristics, mechanism of action, dosing, efficacy, safety, and adherence. Published evidence indicates that tablet and drop formulations differ in regard to physical characteristics, dosing, and strength of evidence for efficacy. Whether there are any differences in absorption and mechanism of action between the 2 formulations is currently unknown. Optimal dosing, efficacy, and safety have been established for SLIT-T. In contrast, in North America there is little support for efficacy of SLIT-D from randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, and dose ranges have not been appropriately evaluated. SLIT-T treats a single allergen, whereas in the United States SLIT-D often contains multiple allergens to treat polysensitization. The safety profiles of SLIT-T and SLIT-D appear similar, and both formulations are considered safer than SCIT. Professional guidelines should make a clear distinction between SLIT-T and SLIT-D in their recommendations to minimize confusion with the umbrella term SLIT.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is administered via tablets (SLIT-T) or liquid drops (SLIT-D). In North America, currently 4 SLIT-T formulations are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for allergy immunotherapy, and SLIT-D is an off-label use of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) extracts.
OBJECTIVE
To compare and contrast aspects of SLIT-T and SLIT-D, including physical characteristics, mechanism of action, dosing, efficacy, safety, adherence, and cost.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed literature review (no limits), product prescribing information, and manufacturer websites.
STUDY SELECTIONS
Publications related to physical characteristics, mechanism of action, dosing, efficacy, safety, and adherence.
RESULTS
Published evidence indicates that tablet and drop formulations differ in regard to physical characteristics, dosing, and strength of evidence for efficacy. Whether there are any differences in absorption and mechanism of action between the 2 formulations is currently unknown. Optimal dosing, efficacy, and safety have been established for SLIT-T. In contrast, in North America there is little support for efficacy of SLIT-D from randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, and dose ranges have not been appropriately evaluated. SLIT-T treats a single allergen, whereas in the United States SLIT-D often contains multiple allergens to treat polysensitization. The safety profiles of SLIT-T and SLIT-D appear similar, and both formulations are considered safer than SCIT.
CONCLUSION
Professional guidelines should make a clear distinction between SLIT-T and SLIT-D in their recommendations to minimize confusion with the umbrella term SLIT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31923544
pii: S1081-1206(19)31532-7
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.12.025
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Allergens 0
Pharmaceutical Solutions 0
Tablets 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

573-582

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mike Tankersley (M)

Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics and Otolaryngology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; The Tankersley Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee. Electronic address: mtanker6@uthsc.edu.

Joseph K Han (JK)

Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Sinus-Skull Base Surgery, Division of Allergy, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Hendrik Nolte (H)

ALK-Abelló, Bedminster, New Jersey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH