Comparison of the Effect of Age (< 75 Versus ≥ 75) on the Efficacy and Safety of Dual Therapy (Dabigatran + Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor) Versus Triple Therapy (Warfarin + Aspirin + Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor) in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the RE-DUAL PCI Trial).
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticoagulants
/ therapeutic use
Aspirin
/ therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation
/ complications
Clopidogrel
/ therapeutic use
Coronary Artery Disease
/ therapy
Dabigatran
/ therapeutic use
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Revascularization
/ statistics & numerical data
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Proportional Hazards Models
Stroke
/ etiology
Thromboembolism
/ epidemiology
Ticagrelor
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Warfarin
/ therapeutic use
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2020
01 03 2020
Historique:
received:
12
06
2019
revised:
19
11
2019
accepted:
21
11
2019
pubmed:
12
1
2020
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
12
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The RE-DUAL PCI trial reported that dabigatran dual therapy (110/150 mg twice daily, plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor) reduced bleeding events versus warfarin triple therapy (warfarin plus aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, with noninferiority in composite thromboembolic events. In this prespecified analysis, risks of first major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event and composite end point of death, thromboembolic events, or unplanned revascularization were compared between dabigatran dual therapy and warfarin triple therapy in older (≥ 75 years) and younger (< 75 years) patients, using Cox proportional hazard regression. Of 2,725 patients randomized to treatment, 1,026 (37.7%) were categorized into older and 1,699 (62.3%) into younger age groups. Dabigatran 110 mg dual therapy lowered bleeding risk versus warfarin triple therapy in older (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 0.89) and younger patients (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.54); interaction p value: 0.0125. Dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy lowered bleeding risk versus warfarin triple therapy in younger patients (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.74), whereas no benefit could be observed in older patients (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.77); interaction p value: 0.0013. For the thromboembolic end point, there was a trend for a higher risk with dabigatran 110 mg dual therapy in older patients, compared with warfarin triple therapy, whereas the risk was similar in younger patients. For dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy, the thromboembolic risk versus warfarin triple therapy was similar in older and younger patients. In conclusion, the benefits of dabigatran dual therapy differed in the 2 age groups, which may help dose selection when using dabigatran dual therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31924322
pii: S0002-9149(19)31353-0
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.029
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Warfarin
5Q7ZVV76EI
Clopidogrel
A74586SNO7
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Dabigatran
I0VM4M70GC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
735-743Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.