Prospects of toxoplasmosis control by cat vaccination.

Cat vaccination Compartmental model Control Dose response Toxoplasmosis

Journal

Epidemics
ISSN: 1878-0067
Titre abrégé: Epidemics
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101484711

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 16 04 2019
revised: 18 11 2019
accepted: 01 12 2019
pubmed: 12 1 2020
medline: 12 1 2020
entrez: 12 1 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Toxoplasmosis has high disease burden in the Netherlands and in the rest of Europe. It can be acquired directly by ingestion of Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) oocysts shed by infected cats, or indirectly via consumption of undercooked meat from infected livestock. Cat vaccination has been proposed for reducing oocyst-acquired human infections but it remains unclear whether such an intervention can be effective. In this study we quantified the effects of using cat vaccination on reducing oocyst-originated T. gondii human infections. By using a disease dynamics compartmental model for T. gondii infections in cats and mice we studied the effects of a hypothetical cat vaccine on the presence of T. gondii oocysts in the environment. A fitted dose response model was used to assess the effect of oocyst reduction on the expected human infections. For rats, mice and pigs, and possibly intermediate hosts in general, ingestion of one oocyst provides 30%-60% probability of T. gondii infection. Assuming a favourable ideal scenario where vaccination completely prevents oocyst shedding and predation rate is of one mouse per week per cat, eight cats can be left susceptible in order to achieve elimination and stop oocyst-originated transmission, independent of the total cat population. Considering populations of 1000, 100, 50 and 20 cats, cat vaccination coverage of 94%, 68%, 54% and 35%, respectively, would reduce expected oocyst-originated human cases by 50%. For attaining elimination of oocyst-originated human infections, only few cats may remain unvaccinated, regardless of the cat-population size, and only a few more cats may remain unvaccinated for reducing infections substantially. Such vaccination coverages can in practice be achieved only when small cat-populations are considered, but in larger cat-populations the large efficacy and vaccination coverage needed are unfeasible.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31926434
pii: S1755-4365(19)30059-3
doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.100380
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100380

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Axel A Bonačić Marinović (AA)

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Electronic address: axel.bonacic.marinovic@rivm.nl.

Marieke Opsteegh (M)

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Huifang Deng (H)

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Anita W M Suijkerbuijk (AWM)

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Paul F van Gils (PF)

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Joke van der Giessen (J)

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH