Frontolimbic, Frontoparietal, and Default Mode Involvement in Functional Dysconnectivity in Psychotic Bipolar Disorder.
Bipolar disorder
Functional connectivity
Graph theory
Psychosis
Structure–function coupling
rs-fMRI
Journal
Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging
ISSN: 2451-9030
Titre abrégé: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101671285
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
15
08
2019
revised:
29
10
2019
accepted:
30
10
2019
pubmed:
14
1
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
entrez:
14
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Functional abnormalities, mostly involving functionally specialized subsystems, have been associated with disorders of emotion regulation such as bipolar disorder (BD). Understanding how independent functional subsystems integrate globally and how they relate with anatomical cortical and subcortical networks is key to understanding how the human brain's architecture constrains functional interactions and underpins abnormalities of mood and emotion, particularly in BD. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance time series were averaged to obtain individual functional connectivity matrices (using AFNI software); individual structural connectivity matrices were derived using deterministic non-tensor-based tractography (using ExploreDTI, version 4.8.6), weighted by streamline count and fractional anisotropy. Structural and functional nodes were defined using a subject-specific cortico-subcortical mapping (using Desikan-Killiany Atlas, FreeSurfer, version 5.3). Whole-brain connectivity alongside a permutation-based statistical approach and structure-function coupling were employed to investigate topological variance in individuals with predominantly euthymic BD relative to psychiatrically healthy control subjects. Patients with BD (n = 41) exhibited decreased (synchronous) connectivity in a subnetwork encompassing frontolimbic and posterior-occipital functional connections (T > 3, p = .048), alongside increased (antisynchronous) connectivity within a frontotemporal subnetwork (T > 3, p = .014); all relative to control subjects (n = 56). Preserved whole-brain functional connectivity and comparable structure-function coupling among whole-brain and edge-class connections were observed in patients with BD relative to control subjects. This study presents a functional map of BD dysconnectivity that differentially involves communication within nodes belonging to functionally specialized subsystems-default mode, frontoparietal, and frontolimbic systems; these changes do not extend to be detected globally and may be necessary to maintain a remitted clinical state of BD. Preserved structure-function coupling in BD despite evidence of regional anatomical and functional deficits suggests a dynamic interplay between structural and functional subnetworks.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Functional abnormalities, mostly involving functionally specialized subsystems, have been associated with disorders of emotion regulation such as bipolar disorder (BD). Understanding how independent functional subsystems integrate globally and how they relate with anatomical cortical and subcortical networks is key to understanding how the human brain's architecture constrains functional interactions and underpins abnormalities of mood and emotion, particularly in BD.
METHODS
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance time series were averaged to obtain individual functional connectivity matrices (using AFNI software); individual structural connectivity matrices were derived using deterministic non-tensor-based tractography (using ExploreDTI, version 4.8.6), weighted by streamline count and fractional anisotropy. Structural and functional nodes were defined using a subject-specific cortico-subcortical mapping (using Desikan-Killiany Atlas, FreeSurfer, version 5.3). Whole-brain connectivity alongside a permutation-based statistical approach and structure-function coupling were employed to investigate topological variance in individuals with predominantly euthymic BD relative to psychiatrically healthy control subjects.
RESULTS
Patients with BD (n = 41) exhibited decreased (synchronous) connectivity in a subnetwork encompassing frontolimbic and posterior-occipital functional connections (T > 3, p = .048), alongside increased (antisynchronous) connectivity within a frontotemporal subnetwork (T > 3, p = .014); all relative to control subjects (n = 56). Preserved whole-brain functional connectivity and comparable structure-function coupling among whole-brain and edge-class connections were observed in patients with BD relative to control subjects.
CONCLUSIONS
This study presents a functional map of BD dysconnectivity that differentially involves communication within nodes belonging to functionally specialized subsystems-default mode, frontoparietal, and frontolimbic systems; these changes do not extend to be detected globally and may be necessary to maintain a remitted clinical state of BD. Preserved structure-function coupling in BD despite evidence of regional anatomical and functional deficits suggests a dynamic interplay between structural and functional subnetworks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31926904
pii: S2451-9022(19)30279-4
doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.015
pmc: PMC7613114
mid: EMS149422
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
140-151Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 200804
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 200804/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Nov;29(11):1265-75
pubmed: 17894392
J Affect Disord. 2004 Oct 15;82(2):191-201
pubmed: 15488247
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 5;10(1):1056
pubmed: 30837462
Bipolar Disord. 2012 Jun;14(4):313-25
pubmed: 22631617
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 26;113(17):4824-9
pubmed: 27071087
Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
pubmed: 19819337
Bipolar Disord. 2017 Mar;19(2):97-106
pubmed: 28258639
Brain Connect. 2011;1(1):13-36
pubmed: 22432952
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21976
pubmed: 21818285
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;70(8):783-92
pubmed: 23739835
Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;34:56-63
pubmed: 26945530
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):4022-37
pubmed: 21671731
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Jan;12(1):43-56
pubmed: 21170073
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 15;81(8):718-727
pubmed: 28031150
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Aug 15;40(12):3452-3463
pubmed: 31282606
Bipolar Disord. 2019 May;21(3):215-227
pubmed: 30444299
Bipolar Disord. 2015 Aug;17(5):461-70
pubmed: 25771686
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 15;82(10):746-755
pubmed: 28734460
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;24(9):1296-1318
pubmed: 30279458
Neuroimage. 2010 Dec;53(4):1197-207
pubmed: 20600983
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2018 Aug;43(5):298-316
pubmed: 30125243
Brain Connect. 2019 Dec;9(10):745-759
pubmed: 31591898
Bipolar Disord. 2012 Jun;14(4):326-39
pubmed: 22631618
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;183(1):59-68
pubmed: 20553873
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jan 27;5:184
pubmed: 22363273
Brain Behav. 2019 Jun;9(6):e01257
pubmed: 31066228
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 5;7(1):4698
pubmed: 28680123
J Affect Disord. 2017 Feb;209:217-228
pubmed: 27930915
J Appl Math. 2013 May 21;2013:
pubmed: 24415902
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Dec;41(13):3016-3024
pubmed: 27356764
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 4;7(7):e1165
pubmed: 28675389
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 May;1(3):288-298
pubmed: 27453953
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 1;113(44):12574-12579
pubmed: 27791099
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 1;154:169-173
pubmed: 27888059
Bipolar Disord. 2008 Sep;10(6):708-17
pubmed: 18837865
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):21-31
pubmed: 29203085
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;26(8):4036-4045
pubmed: 31666679
Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):766-76
pubmed: 20116438
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;174(12):1214-1222
pubmed: 28817956