An international stakeholder survey of the role of chiropractic qualifying examinations:

Certification/Standards Chiropractic Educational Measurement/standards Internationality Licensure

Journal

The Journal of chiropractic education
ISSN: 1042-5055
Titre abrégé: J Chiropr Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8915779

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 14 1 2020
medline: 14 1 2020
entrez: 14 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Many countries require examinations as a gateway to chiropractic licensure; however, the relevance of these exams to the profession has not been explored. The purposes of this study were to analyze perceptions of international stakeholders about chiropractic qualifying examinations (CQEs), observe if their beliefs were in alignment with those that society expects of professions, and suggest how this information may be used when making future decisions about CQEs. We designed an electronic survey that included open-ended questions related to CQEs. In August 2019, the survey was distributed to 234 international stakeholders representing academic institutions, qualifying boards, students, practitioners, association officers, and others. Written comments were extracted, and concepts were categorized and collapsed into 4 categories (benefits, myths, concerns, solutions). Qualitative analysis was used to identify themes. The response rate was 56.4% representing 43 countries and yielding 775 comments. Perceived benefits included that CQEs certify a minimum standard of knowledge and competency and are part of the professionalization of chiropractic. Myths included that CQEs are able to screen for future quality of care or ethical practices. Concerns included a lack of standardization between jurisdictions and uncertainty about the cost/value of CQEs and what they measure. Solutions included suggestions to standardize exams across jurisdictions and focus on competencies. International stakeholders identified concepts about CQEs that may facilitate or hinder collaboration and efforts toward portability. Stakeholder beliefs were aligned with those expected of learned professions. This qualitative analysis identified 9 major themes that may be used when making future decisions about CQEs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31928424
doi: 10.7899/JCE-19-22
pmc: PMC7074948
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

15-30

Références

Med Teach. 2009 Mar;31(3):221-2
pubmed: 19811120
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):73-88
pubmed: 4724034
Med Teach. 2009 Mar;31(3):217-20
pubmed: 19811119
Med Educ. 2005 Dec;39(12):1176-7
pubmed: 16313574
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Mar-Apr;20(3):179-84
pubmed: 9127256
Chiropr Hist. 1993 Jun;13(1):41-4
pubmed: 11613046
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Oct;12(5):330-6
pubmed: 14532363
PLoS Med. 2010 Aug;8(8):e1001069
pubmed: 21829330
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 28;7(9):782-790
pubmed: 30316226
Teach Learn Med. 2004 Winter;16(1):74-6
pubmed: 14987179
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 19;16(1):212
pubmed: 27543269
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):15-7
pubmed: 26695461
Acad Med. 2014 Aug;89(8):1157-62
pubmed: 24853199
JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):226-35
pubmed: 11779266
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(9):762-73
pubmed: 17142167
BMC Med Educ. 2008 Nov 25;8:53
pubmed: 19032779
Chiropr Hist. 1998 Jun;18(1):79-100
pubmed: 11620299
Med Educ. 2014 Jan;48(1):75-86
pubmed: 24330120
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):12-4
pubmed: 26695460
Med Teach. 2009 Mar;31(3):189-91
pubmed: 19811114
Acad Med. 2000 Jun;75(6):612-6
pubmed: 10875505
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Jul 24;27:36
pubmed: 31367341
J Chiropr Educ. 2017 Mar;31(1):20-26
pubmed: 27967211
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):101-14
pubmed: 26695470
Eval Health Prof. 1994 Jun;17(2):198-221; discussion 236-41
pubmed: 10134548
Soc Serv Rev. 1982 Dec;56(4):501-15
pubmed: 10258442
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):73
pubmed: 28454581
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jan;21(1):8-13
pubmed: 9467095

Auteurs

Classifications MeSH