Ensembled machine learning framework for drug sensitivity prediction.
Journal
IET systems biology
ISSN: 1751-8857
Titre abrégé: IET Syst Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101301198
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
entrez:
14
1
2020
pubmed:
14
1
2020
medline:
24
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Drug sensitivity prediction is one of the critical tasks involved in drug designing and discovery. Recently several online databases and consortiums have contributed to providing open access to pharmacogenomic data. These databases have helped in developing computational approaches for drug sensitivity prediction. Cancer is a complex disease involving the heterogeneous behaviour of same tumour-type patients towards the same kind of drug therapy. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to predict drug sensitivity. However, these methods are not efficient enough to predict drug sensitivity. The present study has proposed an ensemble learning framework for drug-response prediction using a modified rotation forest. The proposed framework is further compared with three state-of-the-art algorithms and two baseline methods using Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) drug screens. The authors have also predicted missing drug response values in the data set using the proposed approach. The proposed approach outperforms other counterparts even though gene mutation data is not incorporated while designing the approach. An average mean square error of 3.14 and 0.404 is achieved using GDSC and CCLE drug screens, respectively. The obtained results show that the proposed framework has considerable potential to improve anti-cancer drug response prediction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31931480
doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2018.5094
pmc: PMC8687333
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
39-46Références
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):603-7
pubmed: 22460905
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186906
pubmed: 29073279
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 1;20(3):531-9
pubmed: 24323903
Sci Rep. 2014 May 02;4:4874
pubmed: 24786396
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 23;6:31619
pubmed: 27550087
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2014;:27-38
pubmed: 24297531
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 2;17(1):513
pubmed: 28768489
Cell Cycle. 2018;17(4):486-491
pubmed: 29251172
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006 Oct;28(10):1619-30
pubmed: 16986543
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):570-5
pubmed: 22460902
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101183
pubmed: 24978814
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Aug 25;54(8):2347-59
pubmed: 25046554
Artif Intell Med. 2016 Oct;73:70-77
pubmed: 27926382
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Mar 15;17(6):1591-602
pubmed: 21278246
Gene. 2018 Feb 20;644:80-86
pubmed: 29122646
Bioinformatics. 2014 Sep 1;30(17):i556-63
pubmed: 25161247
BMC Syst Biol. 2017 Oct 3;11(Suppl 5):94
pubmed: 28984192
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Dec;32(12):1202-12
pubmed: 24880487
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Sep 29;11(9):e1004498
pubmed: 26418249