Rapid brain MRI protocols reduce head computerized tomography use in the pediatric emergency department.
Emergency medicine
Fast MRI
Neuroimaging
Quickbrain MRI
Rapid MRI
Journal
BMC pediatrics
ISSN: 1471-2431
Titre abrégé: BMC Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967804
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 01 2020
13 01 2020
Historique:
received:
27
10
2019
accepted:
08
01
2020
entrez:
15
1
2020
pubmed:
15
1
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rapid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols may be effective in the emergency department (ED) to evaluate nontraumatic neurologic complaints. We evaluate neuroimaging (rapid MRI [rMRI]), head computerized tomography [HCT], and full MRI) use following widespread implementation of rMRI protocols in a pediatric emergency department (ED). We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary care pediatric ED of encounters with neuroimaging during two 9-month periods: one prior to (control period) and one after generalized availability of 4 rMRI protocols (rMRI period). The primary outcome was differences in neuroimaging rates between the two periods. Secondary outcomes included ED process measures, unsuccessful imaging, and undetected pathology, with full MRI within 14 days as the reference standard. There were 1052 encounters with neuroimaging during the control and 1308 during the rMRI periods. Differences in neuroimaging between periods were 27.7% for rMRI (95% CI, 24.4, 31.0), - 21.5% for HCT (95% CI, - 25.5, - 17.5), and - 6.2% for full MRI (95% CI, - 9.3, - 3.1%.) Time to imaging (182 [IQR 138-255] versus 86 [IQR 52-137] minutes) as well as ED length of stay (396 [IQR 304-484] versus 257 [IQR 196-334] minutes) was longer for rMRI versus HCT (p < 0.01). Between the control and rMRI periods, there were differences in types of neuroimaging performed for patients with altered mental status, headache, seizure, shunt dysfunction, stroke, syncope, trauma, vomiting, infection, and other neurologic complaints (p < 0.05). rMRI studies were unsuccessful in 3.6% of studies versus 0.0% of HCTs (p < 0.01). The 22 unsuccessful rMRI studies were unsuccessful due to artifacts from dental hardware (n = 2) and patient motion (n = 20). None of the rMRI studies with full MRI follow-up imaging had undetected pathology; the false negative rate for the HCT exams was as high as 25%. After routine ED use of 4 rMRI protocols, there was a more than 20% decrease in HCT use without missed diagnoses. Time to neuroimaging and length of stay were longer for rMRI than HCT, with higher rates of unsuccessful imaging. Despite these limitations, rMRI may be an alternative to HCT for nontraumatic complaints in the ED.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Rapid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols may be effective in the emergency department (ED) to evaluate nontraumatic neurologic complaints. We evaluate neuroimaging (rapid MRI [rMRI]), head computerized tomography [HCT], and full MRI) use following widespread implementation of rMRI protocols in a pediatric emergency department (ED).
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary care pediatric ED of encounters with neuroimaging during two 9-month periods: one prior to (control period) and one after generalized availability of 4 rMRI protocols (rMRI period). The primary outcome was differences in neuroimaging rates between the two periods. Secondary outcomes included ED process measures, unsuccessful imaging, and undetected pathology, with full MRI within 14 days as the reference standard.
RESULTS
There were 1052 encounters with neuroimaging during the control and 1308 during the rMRI periods. Differences in neuroimaging between periods were 27.7% for rMRI (95% CI, 24.4, 31.0), - 21.5% for HCT (95% CI, - 25.5, - 17.5), and - 6.2% for full MRI (95% CI, - 9.3, - 3.1%.) Time to imaging (182 [IQR 138-255] versus 86 [IQR 52-137] minutes) as well as ED length of stay (396 [IQR 304-484] versus 257 [IQR 196-334] minutes) was longer for rMRI versus HCT (p < 0.01). Between the control and rMRI periods, there were differences in types of neuroimaging performed for patients with altered mental status, headache, seizure, shunt dysfunction, stroke, syncope, trauma, vomiting, infection, and other neurologic complaints (p < 0.05). rMRI studies were unsuccessful in 3.6% of studies versus 0.0% of HCTs (p < 0.01). The 22 unsuccessful rMRI studies were unsuccessful due to artifacts from dental hardware (n = 2) and patient motion (n = 20). None of the rMRI studies with full MRI follow-up imaging had undetected pathology; the false negative rate for the HCT exams was as high as 25%.
CONCLUSIONS
After routine ED use of 4 rMRI protocols, there was a more than 20% decrease in HCT use without missed diagnoses. Time to neuroimaging and length of stay were longer for rMRI than HCT, with higher rates of unsuccessful imaging. Despite these limitations, rMRI may be an alternative to HCT for nontraumatic complaints in the ED.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31931764
doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1919-3
pii: 10.1186/s12887-020-1919-3
pmc: PMC6956479
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):1515-1518
pubmed: 30002051
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;33(7):887-90
pubmed: 25912791
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Apr;46(4):519-26
pubmed: 26589303
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):1836-40
pubmed: 23557956
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):793-801
pubmed: 21467249
J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Mar;20(3):400-5
pubmed: 23266077
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Apr;13(4):440-7
pubmed: 24559278
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505
pubmed: 22681860
Pediatr Neurol. 2018 Jan;78:55-60
pubmed: 29174005
Lancet Neurol. 2008 May;7(5):425-35
pubmed: 18420156
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Jun;13(6):636-40
pubmed: 24724716
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f2360
pubmed: 23694687
Emerg Radiol. 2007 Jul;14(3):135-41
pubmed: 17564732
J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101(2 Suppl):147-51
pubmed: 15835101
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Mar;47(3):327-332
pubmed: 28083700
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008 Dec;2(6):438-44
pubmed: 19035694
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Apr;15(4):420-6
pubmed: 25634816
Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):e1212-9
pubmed: 26504136
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Apr;38(4):807-813
pubmed: 28183837
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Apr;31(4):239-42
pubmed: 25188755
Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e47-54
pubmed: 24918222