Clinical and radiographic predictors of acute compartment syndrome in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective cohort study.
Acute compartment syndrome
Fasciotomy
Risk factors
Tibial diaphysis fracture
Tibial shaft fracture
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2020
13 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
30
05
2019
accepted:
06
01
2020
entrez:
15
1
2020
pubmed:
15
1
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between epidemiological, clinical and radiographic factors of patients with tibial shaft fractures and the occurrence of acute compartment syndrome. 270 consecutive adult patients sustaining 273 tibial shaft fractures between January 2005 and December 2009 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The outcome measure was acute compartment syndrome. Patient-related (age, sex), fracture-related (high- vs. low-energy injury, isolated trauma vs. polytrauma, closed vs. open fracture) and radiological parameters (AO/OTA classification, presence or absence of a noncontiguous tibial plateau or pilon fracture, distance from the centre of the tibial fracture to the talar dome, distance between tibial and fibular fracture if associated, and angulation, translation and over-riding of main tibial fragments) were evaluated regarding their potential association with acute compartment syndrome. Univariate analysis was performed and each covariate was adjusted for age and sex. Finally, a multivariable logistic regression model was built, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Acute compartment syndrome developed in 31 (11.4%) cases. In the multivariable regression model, four covariates remained statistically significantly associated with acute compartment syndrome: polytrauma, closed fracture, associated tibial plateau or pilon fracture and distance from the centre of the tibial fracture to the talar dome ≥15 cm. One radiological parameter related to the occurrence of acute compartment syndrome has been highlighted in this study, namely a longer distance from the centre of the tibial fracture to the talar dome, meaning a more proximal fracture. This observation may be useful when clinical findings are difficult to assess (doubtful clinical signs, obtunded, sedated or intubated patients). However, larger studies are mandatory to confirm and refine the prediction of acute compartment syndrome occurrence. Radiographic signs of significant displacement were not found to be correlated to acute compartment syndrome development. Finally, the higher rate of acute compartment syndrome occurring in tibial shaft fractures associated to other musculoskeletal, thoraco-abdominal or cranio-cerebral injuries must raise the level of suspicion of any surgeon managing multiply injured patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between epidemiological, clinical and radiographic factors of patients with tibial shaft fractures and the occurrence of acute compartment syndrome.
METHODS
METHODS
270 consecutive adult patients sustaining 273 tibial shaft fractures between January 2005 and December 2009 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The outcome measure was acute compartment syndrome. Patient-related (age, sex), fracture-related (high- vs. low-energy injury, isolated trauma vs. polytrauma, closed vs. open fracture) and radiological parameters (AO/OTA classification, presence or absence of a noncontiguous tibial plateau or pilon fracture, distance from the centre of the tibial fracture to the talar dome, distance between tibial and fibular fracture if associated, and angulation, translation and over-riding of main tibial fragments) were evaluated regarding their potential association with acute compartment syndrome. Univariate analysis was performed and each covariate was adjusted for age and sex. Finally, a multivariable logistic regression model was built, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Acute compartment syndrome developed in 31 (11.4%) cases. In the multivariable regression model, four covariates remained statistically significantly associated with acute compartment syndrome: polytrauma, closed fracture, associated tibial plateau or pilon fracture and distance from the centre of the tibial fracture to the talar dome ≥15 cm.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
One radiological parameter related to the occurrence of acute compartment syndrome has been highlighted in this study, namely a longer distance from the centre of the tibial fracture to the talar dome, meaning a more proximal fracture. This observation may be useful when clinical findings are difficult to assess (doubtful clinical signs, obtunded, sedated or intubated patients). However, larger studies are mandatory to confirm and refine the prediction of acute compartment syndrome occurrence. Radiographic signs of significant displacement were not found to be correlated to acute compartment syndrome development. Finally, the higher rate of acute compartment syndrome occurring in tibial shaft fractures associated to other musculoskeletal, thoraco-abdominal or cranio-cerebral injuries must raise the level of suspicion of any surgeon managing multiply injured patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31931775
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3044-8
pii: 10.1186/s12891-020-3044-8
pmc: PMC6958679
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25Références
J Emerg Med. 2013 May;44(5):1039-44
pubmed: 23321294
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jul;30(7):387-91
pubmed: 26913594
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):307
pubmed: 28720096
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133
pubmed: 18277234
J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96
pubmed: 4814394
J Trauma. 1988 Jan;28(1):69-77
pubmed: 3123707
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Mar;82(2):200-3
pubmed: 10755426
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S14-9
pubmed: 25284227
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Aug;23(7):514-8
pubmed: 19633461
J Trauma. 1984 Aug;24(8):742-6
pubmed: 6471139
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Jul;85(5):625-32
pubmed: 12892179
Math Med Biol. 2017 Dec 11;34(4):547-558
pubmed: 27756790
Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7
pubmed: 16814787
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Nov;13(7):436-44
pubmed: 16272268
Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):3
pubmed: 27747735
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Oct;29(10):451-5
pubmed: 25882967
Orthopedics. 2013 Aug;36(8):619-24
pubmed: 23937740
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):453-8
pubmed: 773941
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Dec;68(9):1348-53
pubmed: 3782206
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170
pubmed: 29256945
Instr Course Lect. 2011;60:35-42
pubmed: 21553760
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Oct;29(10):456-9
pubmed: 26397776
J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Sep;16(3):185-92
pubmed: 25543232
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Oct;(160):175-84
pubmed: 7026116
Orthopedics. 1997 May;20(5):403-6
pubmed: 9172247
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998 May;84(3):272-80
pubmed: 9775050
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571