Cardiac resynchronization in Poland - comparable procedural routines? Insights from CRT Survey II.
cardiac resynchronisation therapy
chronic heart failure
survey
Journal
Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology
ISSN: 1734-9338
Titre abrégé: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101272671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
27
03
2019
accepted:
01
07
2019
entrez:
15
1
2020
pubmed:
15
1
2020
medline:
15
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
CRT Survey II was initiated by the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association, to explore everyday implantation practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices in a broad spectrum of hospitals in European Society of Cardiology (ESC) member countries. To compare Polish and European procedural practice. Procedural details of Polish patients collected in 37 Polish centres ( There were significant differences in: successful implantation (96.1% vs. 97.4%), type of device implanted (for CRT-D: 87% vs. 67.6%), implanting physician subspecialty (for electrophysiologist: 69.2% vs. 79.8%), type of location of procedure (for operating room: 19.4% vs. 8.9%), duration of procedure (117.8 ±44 vs. 97.5 ±46.1 min), left ventricle lead type (for multipolar lead: 50% vs. 57.9%), coronary sinus venogram with occlusion rate (41.4% vs. 47.9%) and peri-procedural complication rate (7.5% vs. 5.3%) between Poland and CRT II Survey groups, respectively. This study provides important information describing current differences in Polish procedural routines in relation to ESC member countries. Heterogeneous CRT implantation practices across European countries still exist. However, it may be related to different clinical profile of patients qualified for CRT implantation in Poland as well as organization of care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31933665
doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.90223
pii: 38760
pmc: PMC6956455
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
477-484Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;20(10):1457-1468
pubmed: 29806208
Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov;33(21):2662-71
pubmed: 22285578
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 2;52(23):1834-1843
pubmed: 19038680
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;28(12):1255-9
pubmed: 16403156
Eur Heart J. 2010 Mar;31(5):525-9
pubmed: 20093258
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 May;38(5):558-64
pubmed: 25640457
Europace. 2017 Aug 1;19(suppl_2):ii1-ii90
pubmed: 28903470
N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 14;352(15):1539-49
pubmed: 15753115
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1845-53
pubmed: 12063368
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 16;363(25):2385-95
pubmed: 21073365
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jan;8(1):31-7
pubmed: 20887804
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1329-38
pubmed: 19723701
Europace. 2011 Jul;13(7):992-6
pubmed: 21343237
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
Eur J Heart Fail. 2008 Dec;10(12):1229-35
pubmed: 19004666
Europace. 2015 Jan;17(1):137-41
pubmed: 25414481
Circulation. 2011 Mar 22;123(11):1159-66
pubmed: 21382893
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 22;344(12):873-80
pubmed: 11259720
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0154024
pubmed: 27124724
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50
pubmed: 15152059
Europace. 2011 Oct;13(10):1445-53
pubmed: 21712274
Eur Heart J. 2009 Oct;30(20):2450-60
pubmed: 19723694
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 24;59(17):1509-18
pubmed: 22405632
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 30;58(10):995-1000
pubmed: 21867832
Europace. 2015 May;17(5):767-77
pubmed: 25926473
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Nov;9(11):
pubmed: 27906653
Europace. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:i1-75
pubmed: 25616426