Implementation of a Spine-Centered Care Pathway at a Regional Academic Spine Center.
clinical care pathway
complications
cost-effectiveness
elective spinal surgery
postoperative care
spine care pathway
spine pathway
Journal
Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
entrez:
15
1
2020
pubmed:
15
1
2020
medline:
15
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective case series. To describe the early implementation of an inpatient spinal surgery unit and measure the impact on cost and length of stay (LOS). A retrospective case review was performed for frequent spine-related diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) cared for by a dedicated multidisciplinary team: combined anterior/posterior (AP) spinal fusion with major complicating or comorbid condition (MCC), combined (AP) spinal fusion with CC, combined (AP) spinal fusion without complicating or comorbid (CC)/MCC, cervical spinal fusion with MCC, cervical spinal fusion with CC, and cervical spinal fusion without CC/MCC. Four time periods were compared: historical control, initial pathway implementation, full pathway implementation, and spine unit opening. Mean hospital LOS, mean and median total costs (USD), and ratio of costs-to-charges were analyzed. The number of spine cases per interim ranged from 219 to 258. The mean overall hospital LOS and mean cost varied from 3.8 to 4.3 days for all DRGs across the time periods and was not significant. Cost also did not vary significantly throughout. Median variable cost per anterior/posterior spinal fusion procedure with a CC or MCC declined by 16 311, first with the institution of a spine pathway protocol by USD8738 and then USD7423 with the establishment of a spine care unit but did not reach significance. The use of a standardized, inpatient spine care pathway implemented by a multidisciplinary team may reduce the hospital length of stay and decrease overall costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31934518
doi: 10.1177/2192568219856354
pii: 10.1177_2192568219856354
pmc: PMC6947681
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
36S-40SInformations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
R I Med J (2013). 2014 Oct 01;97(10):47-9
pubmed: 25271662
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34
pubmed: 27074067
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jul;76(7):607-11
pubmed: 16813627
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Nov 22;170(21):1942-3
pubmed: 21098357
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Nov;58(11):1042-5
pubmed: 14630887
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1979 Mar-Apr;4(2):156-62
pubmed: 264030
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 15;25(6):738-40
pubmed: 10752108
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Feb;34(2):98-106
pubmed: 21334541
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23
pubmed: 27074066
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2724-7
pubmed: 17077742
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):62-8
pubmed: 19124635
Geriatrics. 1998 Oct;53(10):26-8, 33-6, 39-40 passim
pubmed: 9791195
Instr Course Lect. 1985;34:17-36
pubmed: 2939144
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 25;171(14):1298; author reply 1298-9
pubmed: 21788551
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S164-71
pubmed: 21952187
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11 Suppl):S44-8
pubmed: 17495586