Relationship between the Renal Function and Adverse Clinical Events in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Japanese Multicenter Registry Substudy.
Japanese
adverse clinical events
atrial fibrillation
direct oral anticoagulant
renal function
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jan 2020
08 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
08
12
2019
revised:
30
12
2019
accepted:
07
01
2020
entrez:
16
1
2020
pubmed:
16
1
2020
medline:
16
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) often coexist, but the real-world data after approval of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are still lacking in Japan. We investigated the association of the baseline renal function and adverse clinical events and risk of adverse clinical events with DOACs compared to warfarin for each renal functional level in Japanese AF patients. The present substudy was based on the SAKURA AF Registry, a Japanese multicenter observational registry (median follow-up period: 39 months). The creatinine clearance (CrCl) values were estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and divided into normal renal function, and mild and moderate-severe CKD (CrCl ≥ 80, 50-79, <50 mL/min). In the SAKURA AF Registry, the baseline CrCl data were available for 3242 patients (52% for DOAC and 48% for warfarin user). The relative risk of adverse clinical events was significantly higher in the patients with a CrCl < 50 mL/min as compared to those with a CrCl ≥ 80 mL/min (adjusted HRs: 2.53 for death, 2.53 for cardiovascular [CV] events, 2.13 for strokes, and 1.83 for major bleeding). Risks of all adverse clinical events were statistically even between DOAC and warfarin users for each renal function level. Moderate-severe CKD was associated with a higher mortality, CV events, strokes, and major bleeding than normal renal function. The safety and effectiveness of DOACs over warfarin were similar for each renal function level. By a worsening renal function, the incidence of adverse clinical events increased, especially deaths and CV events as compared to strokes and major bleeding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) often coexist, but the real-world data after approval of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are still lacking in Japan. We investigated the association of the baseline renal function and adverse clinical events and risk of adverse clinical events with DOACs compared to warfarin for each renal functional level in Japanese AF patients.
METHODS
METHODS
The present substudy was based on the SAKURA AF Registry, a Japanese multicenter observational registry (median follow-up period: 39 months). The creatinine clearance (CrCl) values were estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and divided into normal renal function, and mild and moderate-severe CKD (CrCl ≥ 80, 50-79, <50 mL/min).
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the SAKURA AF Registry, the baseline CrCl data were available for 3242 patients (52% for DOAC and 48% for warfarin user). The relative risk of adverse clinical events was significantly higher in the patients with a CrCl < 50 mL/min as compared to those with a CrCl ≥ 80 mL/min (adjusted HRs: 2.53 for death, 2.53 for cardiovascular [CV] events, 2.13 for strokes, and 1.83 for major bleeding). Risks of all adverse clinical events were statistically even between DOAC and warfarin users for each renal function level.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Moderate-severe CKD was associated with a higher mortality, CV events, strokes, and major bleeding than normal renal function. The safety and effectiveness of DOACs over warfarin were similar for each renal function level. By a worsening renal function, the incidence of adverse clinical events increased, especially deaths and CV events as compared to strokes and major bleeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31936260
pii: jcm9010167
doi: 10.3390/jcm9010167
pmc: PMC7019418
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Arrhythm. 2017 Aug;33(4):289-296
pubmed: 28765759
Circ J. 2011;75(6):1328-33
pubmed: 21467664
Chest. 2010 Nov;138(5):1093-100
pubmed: 20299623
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 28;6:30271
pubmed: 27466080
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8
pubmed: 23208313
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2093-104
pubmed: 24251359
Thromb Haemost. 1993 Mar 1;69(3):236-9
pubmed: 8470047
Nephron. 1976;16(1):31-41
pubmed: 1244564
Circulation. 2016 Jul 5;134(1):24-36
pubmed: 27358434
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):883-91
pubmed: 21830957
Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov;33(22):2821-30
pubmed: 22933567
Circ J. 2018 Sep 25;82(10):2500-2509
pubmed: 30078823
Circulation. 2009 Mar 17;119(10):1363-9
pubmed: 19255343
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e018180
pubmed: 29602837
Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):629-36
pubmed: 19781424
Circ J. 2017 Aug 25;81(9):1278-1285
pubmed: 28428449
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 5;8(3):e010510
pubmed: 30717616
Circulation. 2014 Mar 4;129(9):961-70
pubmed: 24323795
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):981-92
pubmed: 21870978
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):59-68
pubmed: 28950373
Circ J. 2013;77(9):2264-70
pubmed: 23708863
Circulation. 2011 Jun 28;123(25):2946-53
pubmed: 21646496
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 15;119(8):1229-1237
pubmed: 28219663
Int J Cardiol. 2009 Oct 2;137(2):102-7
pubmed: 18691774
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51
pubmed: 19717844
Circ J. 2014;78(8):1997-2021
pubmed: 24965079
JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2864-70
pubmed: 11401607