Performance Analysis in Rugby Union: a Critical Systematic Review.

Game analysis Performance indicators Tactical analysis

Journal

Sports medicine - open
ISSN: 2199-1170
Titre abrégé: Sports Med Open
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101662568

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 11 09 2019
accepted: 18 12 2019
entrez: 16 1 2020
pubmed: 16 1 2020
medline: 16 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Performance analysis in rugby union has become an integral part of the coaching process. Although performance analysis research in rugby and data collection has progressed, the utility of the insights is not well understood. The primary objective of this review is to consider the current state of performance analysis research in professional rugby union and consider the utility of common methods of analysing performance and the applicability of these methods within professional coaching practice. SPORTDiscus electronic database was searched for relevant articles published between 1 January 1997 and 7 March 2019. Professional, male 15-a-side rugby union studies that included relevant data on tactical and performance evaluation, and statistical compilation of time-motion analysis were included. Studies were categorised based on the main focus and each study was reviewed by assessing a number of factors such as context, opposition analysis, competition and sample size. Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of these studies measured performance through the collection and analysis of performance indicators. The majority did not provide context relating to multiple confounding factors such as field location, match location and opposition information. Twenty-nine performance indicators differentiated between successful match outcomes; however, only eight were commonly shared across some studies. Five studies considered rugby union as a dynamical system; however, these studies were limited in analysing lower or national-level competitions. The review highlighted the issues associated with assessing isolated measures of performance, lacking contextual information such as the opposition, match location, period within match and field location. A small number of studies have assessed rugby union performance through a dynamical systems lens, identifying successful characteristics in collective behaviour patterns in attacking phases. Performance analysis in international rugby union can be advanced by adopting these approaches in addition to methods currently adopted in other team sports.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Performance analysis in rugby union has become an integral part of the coaching process. Although performance analysis research in rugby and data collection has progressed, the utility of the insights is not well understood. The primary objective of this review is to consider the current state of performance analysis research in professional rugby union and consider the utility of common methods of analysing performance and the applicability of these methods within professional coaching practice.
METHODS METHODS
SPORTDiscus electronic database was searched for relevant articles published between 1 January 1997 and 7 March 2019. Professional, male 15-a-side rugby union studies that included relevant data on tactical and performance evaluation, and statistical compilation of time-motion analysis were included. Studies were categorised based on the main focus and each study was reviewed by assessing a number of factors such as context, opposition analysis, competition and sample size.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of these studies measured performance through the collection and analysis of performance indicators. The majority did not provide context relating to multiple confounding factors such as field location, match location and opposition information. Twenty-nine performance indicators differentiated between successful match outcomes; however, only eight were commonly shared across some studies. Five studies considered rugby union as a dynamical system; however, these studies were limited in analysing lower or national-level competitions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The review highlighted the issues associated with assessing isolated measures of performance, lacking contextual information such as the opposition, match location, period within match and field location. A small number of studies have assessed rugby union performance through a dynamical systems lens, identifying successful characteristics in collective behaviour patterns in attacking phases. Performance analysis in international rugby union can be advanced by adopting these approaches in addition to methods currently adopted in other team sports.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31940120
doi: 10.1186/s40798-019-0232-x
pii: 10.1186/s40798-019-0232-x
pmc: PMC6962412
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

4

Références

Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Oct;30(5):984-97
pubmed: 21334087
Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14 Suppl 1:S8-17
pubmed: 24444248
J Sports Sci. 2008 Nov;26(13):1421-9
pubmed: 18923958
J Sports Sci. 2012;30(12):1207-13
pubmed: 22788797
J Mot Behav. 2011;43(2):155-63
pubmed: 21400329
J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Dec 01;8(4):523-7
pubmed: 24149592
Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):799-836
pubmed: 29243038
J Sports Sci. 2002 Oct;20(10):739-54
pubmed: 12363292
Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Aug;117(1):1107-29
pubmed: 24422340
J Sports Sci. 2003 Aug;21(8):611-20
pubmed: 12875312
J Sports Sci. 2002 Oct;20(10):771-81
pubmed: 12363294
J Sports Sci. 2013;31(6):639-76
pubmed: 23249092
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(12):1238-47
pubmed: 25765524
Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16(1):11-9
pubmed: 24814417
Behav Res Methods. 2006 Nov;38(4):683-91
pubmed: 17393840
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(1):2-7
pubmed: 23886412
J Sports Sci. 2001 Apr;19(4):253-62
pubmed: 11311023
J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Mar 01;9(1):51-5
pubmed: 24149385
Res Sports Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;26(1):51-63
pubmed: 29058465
J Sports Sci. 2005 Jan;23(1):63-72
pubmed: 15841596
PLoS One. 2014 May 09;9(5):e97145
pubmed: 24817186
Sports Med. 2013 Jan;43(1):1-7
pubmed: 23315752
J Sports Sci. 2012;30(11):1175-82
pubmed: 22681567
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Mar;22(3):330-334
pubmed: 30146476
J Sports Sci. 2008 May;26(7):691-700
pubmed: 18409100

Auteurs

Carmen M E Colomer (CME)

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia. carmen.m.colomer@gmail.com.
Brumbies Rugby, University of Canberra, Building 29, University Drive, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia. carmen.m.colomer@gmail.com.

David B Pyne (DB)

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.

Mitch Mooney (M)

Netball Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.

Andrew McKune (A)

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.

Benjamin G Serpell (BG)

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Brumbies Rugby, University of Canberra, Building 29, University Drive, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.

Classifications MeSH