Philosophy of a "Good Death" in Small Animals and Consequences for Euthanasia in Animal Law and Veterinary Practice.

animal death euthanasia guidelines moral stress veterinary ethics

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 30 11 2019
revised: 22 12 2019
accepted: 07 01 2020
entrez: 17 1 2020
pubmed: 17 1 2020
medline: 17 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Moral stress is a major concern in veterinary practice. Often, it is associated with the challenges in end-of-life situations. Euthanasia, however, is also meant to bring relief to animal patients and their owners. The reasons for the moral strain euthanizing animals causes to professional veterinarians need to be further clarified. This article investigates "euthanasia" from a philosophical, legal, and practical perspective. After introducing relevant aspects of euthanasia in small animal practice, the term is analyzed from an ethical point of view. That includes both a broad and a narrow definition of "euthanasia" and underlying assumptions regarding different accounts of animal death and well-being. Then, legal and soft regulations are discussed with regard to the theoretical aspects and practical challenges, also including questions of personal morality. It is argued that the importance of ethical definitions and assumptions concerning euthanasia and their intertwinement with both law and practical challenges should not be neglected. The conclusion is that veterinarians should clarify the reasons for their potential discomfort and that they should be supported by improved decision-making tools, by implementation of theoretical and practical ethics in veterinary education, and by updated animal welfare legislation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31940971
pii: ani10010124
doi: 10.3390/ani10010124
pmc: PMC7022873
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : not applicable

Références

Vet Rec. 2010 Mar 27;166(13):388-97
pubmed: 20348468
Vet Rec. 2012 Jan 7;170(1):19
pubmed: 22084032
Animals (Basel). 2016 Mar 14;6(3):
pubmed: 27102171
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Apr 19;4:45
pubmed: 28470002
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2011 May;41(3):651-9
pubmed: 21601753
Vet Rec. 2012 Nov 3;171(18):446
pubmed: 23015727
J Vet Med Educ. 2008 Winter;35(4):525-31
pubmed: 19228904
Vet Rec. 2011 Mar 12;168(10):263
pubmed: 21498175
Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1105-1113
pubmed: 28622011
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):223-40
pubmed: 21181111
J Vet Med Educ. 2014 Winter;41(4):344-9
pubmed: 25335646
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2011 May;153(5):209-14
pubmed: 21696009
Vet Rec. 2018 Jun 9;182(23):664
pubmed: 29602799
Vet Rec. 2000 Mar 4;146(10):269-72
pubmed: 10749039
Can Vet J. 1999 Jan;40(1):33-9
pubmed: 9919365
J Small Anim Pract. 2009 Jun;50(6):274-81
pubmed: 19527420
BMC Vet Res. 2016 Feb 04;12:26
pubmed: 26847551

Auteurs

Kirsten Persson (K)

Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Felicitas Selter (F)

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

Gerald Neitzke (G)

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

Peter Kunzmann (P)

Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Classifications MeSH