Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma: 3-year update of the ECHELON-1 study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bleomycin
/ therapeutic use
Brentuximab Vedotin
/ administration & dosage
Dacarbazine
/ administration & dosage
Doxorubicin
/ administration & dosage
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hodgkin Disease
/ drug therapy
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Vinblastine
/ administration & dosage
Journal
Blood
ISSN: 1528-0020
Titre abrégé: Blood
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603509
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 03 2020
05 03 2020
Historique:
received:
10
09
2019
accepted:
27
11
2019
pubmed:
17
1
2020
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
17
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The phase 3 ECHELON-1 study demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin (A) with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD; A+AVD) exhibited superior modified progression-free survival (PFS) vs doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) for frontline treatment of patients with stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Maturing positron emission tomography (PET)-adapted trial data highlight potential limitations of PET-adapted approaches, including toxicities with dose intensification and higher-than-expected relapse rates in PET scan after cycle 2 (PET2)-negative (PET2-) patients. We present an update of the ECHELON-1 study, including an exploratory analysis of 3-year PFS per investigator. A total of 1334 patients with stage III or IV cHL were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of A+AVD (n = 664) or ABVD (n = 670). Interim PET2 was required. At median follow-up of 37 months, 3-year PFS rates were 83.1% with A+AVD and 76.0% with ABVD; 3-year PFS rates in PET2- patients aged <60 years were 87.2% vs 81.0%, respectively. A beneficial trend in PET2+ patients aged <60 years on A+AVD was also observed, with a 3-year PFS rate of 69.2% vs 54.7% with ABVD. The benefit of A+AVD in the intent-to-treat population appeared independent of disease stage and prognostic risk factors. Upon continued follow-up, 78% of patients with peripheral neuropathy on A+AVD had either complete resolution or improvement compared with 83% on ABVD. These data highlight that A+AVD provides a durable efficacy benefit compared with ABVD for frontline stage III/IV cHL, consistent across key subgroups regardless of patient status at PET2, without need for treatment intensification or bleomycin exposure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01712490 (EudraCT no. 2011-005450-60).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31945149
pii: S0006-4971(20)62206-6
doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003127
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bleomycin
11056-06-7
Vinblastine
5V9KLZ54CY
Dacarbazine
7GR28W0FJI
Brentuximab Vedotin
7XL5ISS668
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01712490']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
735-742Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.