Disabling the Protease DDI2 Attenuates the Transcriptional Activity of NRF1 and Potentiates Proteasome Inhibitor Cytotoxicity.
Animals
Apoptosis
/ drug effects
Aspartic Acid Proteases
/ metabolism
Cell Line, Tumor
Cytosol
/ drug effects
HEK293 Cells
Humans
Mice
NIH 3T3 Cells
Nuclear Respiratory Factor 1
/ metabolism
Oligopeptides
/ pharmacology
Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex
/ metabolism
Proteasome Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Protein Transport
/ drug effects
Transcriptional Activation
/ drug effects
DDI2
NRF1
cancer
proteasome genes
proteasome inhibitor
transcription
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jan 2020
03 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
04
11
2019
revised:
27
12
2019
accepted:
29
12
2019
entrez:
18
1
2020
pubmed:
18
1
2020
medline:
9
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Proteasome inhibition is used therapeutically to induce proteotoxic stress and trigger apoptosis in cancer cells that are highly dependent on the proteasome. As a mechanism of resistance, inhibition of the cellular proteasome induces the synthesis of new, uninhibited proteasomes to restore proteasome activity and relieve proteotoxic stress in the cell, thus evading apoptosis. This evolutionarily conserved compensatory mechanism is referred to as the proteasome-bounce back response and is orchestrated in mammalian cells by nuclear factor erythroid derived 2-related factor 1 (NRF1), a transcription factor and master regulator of proteasome subunit genes. Upon synthesis, NRF1 is cotranslationally inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), then is rapidly retrotranslocated into the cytosol and degraded by the proteasome. In contrast, during conditions of proteasome inhibition or insufficiency, NRF1 escapes degradation, is proteolytically cleaved by the aspartyl protease DNA damage inducible 1 homolog 2 (DDI2) to its active form, and enters the nucleus as an active transcription factor. Despite these insights, the cellular compartment where the proteolytic processing step occurs remains unclear. Here we further probed this pathway and found that NRF1 can be completely retrotranslocated into the cytosol where it is then cleaved and activated by DDI2. Furthermore, using a triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, we investigated the therapeutic utility of attenuating DDI2 function. We found that DDI2 depletion attenuated NRF1 activation and potentiated the cytotoxic effects of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. More importantly, expression of a point-mutant of DDI2 that is protease-dead recapitulated these effects. Taken together, our results provide a strong rationale for a combinational therapy that utilizes inhibition of the proteasome and the protease function of DDI2. This approach could expand the repertoire of cancer types that can be successfully treated with proteasome inhibitors in the clinic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31947743
pii: ijms21010327
doi: 10.3390/ijms21010327
pmc: PMC6982299
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
NRF1 protein, human
0
Nuclear Respiratory Factor 1
0
Oligopeptides
0
Proteasome Inhibitors
0
carfilzomib
72X6E3J5AR
Aspartic Acid Proteases
EC 3.4.-
DDI2 protein, human
EC 3.4.-
Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex
EC 3.4.25.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM132396
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : GM132396
Pays : United States
Références
Curr Biol. 2014 Jul 21;24(14):1573-1583
pubmed: 24998528
Elife. 2016 Aug 16;5:
pubmed: 27528193
Apoptosis. 2019 Aug;24(7-8):662-672
pubmed: 31134446
Drug Metab Dispos. 2013 Jan;41(1):230-7
pubmed: 23118326
Mol Cell. 2018 Jan 4;69(1):24-35.e5
pubmed: 29290612
Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Sep;19(9):3625-37
pubmed: 18562697
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 14;20(16):null
pubmed: 31416203
Mol Cell. 2010 Oct 8;40(1):147-58
pubmed: 20932482
Biochem Pharmacol. 2015 Jul 1;96(1):1-9
pubmed: 25935605
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 13;98(6):3056-61
pubmed: 11248031
Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Jun;25(11):4662-75
pubmed: 15899868
Trends Cell Biol. 2014 Jun;24(6):352-9
pubmed: 24457024
Biochem J. 2010 Sep 15;430(3):497-510
pubmed: 20629635
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 17;8(9):e74415
pubmed: 24069311
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 04;19(1):null
pubmed: 29300316
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;81(2):227-243
pubmed: 29184971
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 29;99(22):14374-9
pubmed: 12391322
Mol Cell Biol. 2011 Feb;31(4):897-909
pubmed: 21149573
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 Apr 1;244(1):16-20
pubmed: 19665035
Virology. 2015 May;479-480:403-17
pubmed: 25816761
Int J Mol Sci. 2010 Mar 11;11(3):1057-69
pubmed: 20479999
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Jul;17(7):1807-19
pubmed: 16738015
Elife. 2014;3:e01856
pubmed: 24448410
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 10;20(14):null
pubmed: 31295808
BMC Biol. 2014 Nov 11;12:94
pubmed: 25385277
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2014;14(6):517-36
pubmed: 25092212
Invest New Drugs. 2015 Jun;33(3):652-63
pubmed: 25777468
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 08;20(19):null
pubmed: 31597263
Nat Methods. 2014 Aug;11(8):783-784
pubmed: 25075903
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 15;9(1):689
pubmed: 29449567
Elife. 2016 Aug 16;5:
pubmed: 27528192
J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 13;278(24):21517-25
pubmed: 12676932
Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Nov 1;24(21):4289-97
pubmed: 8932385
HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2015 Apr 08;7:95-104
pubmed: 25897264
ACS Cent Sci. 2017 Nov 22;3(11):1143-1155
pubmed: 29202016
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 27;6:30443
pubmed: 27461074
J Biol Chem. 2019 Feb 8;294(6):2036-2045
pubmed: 30559296
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016 Jul;15(7):2279-92
pubmed: 27114451
Nat Chem Biol. 2013 Sep;9(9):548-56
pubmed: 23892893
Mol Cell. 2010 Apr 9;38(1):17-28
pubmed: 20385086