Improvement of the intermediate risk prostate cancer sub-classification by integrating MRI and fusion biopsy features.
Biopsy
Fusion biopsies
Intermediate risk
Multiparametric MRI
Prostate cancer
Radical prostatectomy
Targeted biopsies
Journal
Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
26
08
2019
revised:
24
11
2019
accepted:
19
12
2019
pubmed:
18
1
2020
medline:
7
5
2021
entrez:
18
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment decision-making for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (CaP) is mainly based on grade and tumor involvement on systematic biopsy. We aimed to assess the added value of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TB) features for predicting final pathology and for improving the well-established favourable/unfavourable systematic biopsy-based sub-classification. From a prospective database of 377 intermediate risk CaP cases, we evaluated the performance of the standard intermediate risk classification (IRC), and the predictive factors for unfavourable disease on final pathology aiming to build a new model. Overall unfavourable disease (OUD) was defined by any pT3-4 and/or pN1 and/or grade group (GG) ≥ 3. The standard IRC was found to be predictive for unfavourable disease in this population. However, in multivariable analysis regression, ECE on mpMRI and GG ≥3 on TB remained the 2 independent predictive factors for OUD disease (HR = 2.7, P = 0.032, and HR = 2.41, P = 0.01, respectively). By using the new IRC in which unfavorable risk was defined by ECE on mpMRI and/or GG ≥3 on TB, the proportion of unfavorable cases decreased from 62.3% to 34.1% while better predicting unfavorable disease in RP speciments. The new model displayed a better accuracy than the standard IRC for predicting OUD (AUC: 0.66 vs. 0.55). The integration of imaging and TB features drastically improves the intermediate risk sub-classification performance and better discriminates the unfavourable risk group that could benefit from more aggressive therapy such as neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment, and the favourable group that could avoid over-treatment. External validation in other datasets is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31948932
pii: S1078-1439(19)30505-8
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.12.018
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
386-392Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.