A network analysis to identify mediators of germline-driven differences in breast cancer prognosis.
Apoptosis
Breast Neoplasms
/ genetics
Circadian Clocks
Computational Biology
Female
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits
/ genetics
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11
/ genetics
Gene Regulatory Networks
Genetic Variation
Genome-Wide Association Study
Genotype
Germ Cells
Humans
Prognosis
Receptors, Estrogen
/ genetics
Signal Transduction
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 01 2020
16 01 2020
Historique:
received:
31
01
2019
accepted:
17
12
2019
entrez:
18
1
2020
pubmed:
18
1
2020
medline:
9
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Identifying the underlying genetic drivers of the heritability of breast cancer prognosis remains elusive. We adapt a network-based approach to handle underpowered complex datasets to provide new insights into the potential function of germline variants in breast cancer prognosis. This network-based analysis studies ~7.3 million variants in 84,457 breast cancer patients in relation to breast cancer survival and confirms the results on 12,381 independent patients. Aggregating the prognostic effects of genetic variants across multiple genes, we identify four gene modules associated with survival in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and one in ER-positive disease. The modules show biological enrichment for cancer-related processes such as G-alpha signaling, circadian clock, angiogenesis, and Rho-GTPases in apoptosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31949161
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14100-6
pii: 10.1038/s41467-019-14100-6
pmc: PMC6965101
doi:
Substances chimiques
GNA11 protein, human
0
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
G protein alpha 16
EC 3.6.5.1
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11
EC 3.6.5.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
312Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA176785
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201100004I
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA176726
Pays : United States
Organisme : WHI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201100003C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K07 CA092044
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA058223
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA116167
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA128978
Pays : United States
Organisme : WHI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201100002C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U19 CA148112
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA098758
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U19 CA148065
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201100002I
Pays : United States
Organisme : WHI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201100004C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA164917
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA199277
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA179715
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA128931
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201100001I
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA156733
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_14105
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES010126
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA164973
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA087969
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA164920
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA097396
Pays : United States
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 29186
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA176726
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201100046C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA058860
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U19 CA148537
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA116167
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA177150
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA116201
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : HHSN271201100004C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA063464
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA186107
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA023100
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA063464
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA077398
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA054281
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA132839
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA058860
Pays : United States
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10118
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA192393
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R37 CA054281
Pays : United States
Organisme : WHI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201100001C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA164973
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA140286
Pays : United States
Références
Lindström, L. S. et al. Prognostic information of a previously diagnosed sister is an independent prognosticator for a newly diagnosed sister with breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 25, 1966–1972 (2014).
pubmed: 25057175
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu270
Verkooijen, H. M. et al. Breast cancer prognosis is inherited independently of patient, tumor and treatment characteristics. Int. J. Cancer 130, 2103–2110 (2012).
pubmed: 21630259
doi: 10.1002/ijc.26206
Michailidou, K. et al. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature 551, 92–94 (2017).
pubmed: 29059683
pmcid: 5798588
doi: 10.1038/nature24284
Escala-Garcia, M. et al. Genome-wide association study of germline variants and breast cancer-specific mortality. Br. J. Cancer 120, 647–657 (2019).
pubmed: 30787463
pmcid: 6461853
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0393-x
Guo, Q. et al. Identification of novel genetic markers of breast cancer survival. JNCI J. Natl Cancer Inst. 107, djv081–djv081 (2015).
pubmed: 25890600
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv081
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. Analysing biological pathways in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 843–854 (2010).
pubmed: 21085203
doi: 10.1038/nrg2884
Menashe, I. et al. Pathway analysis of breast cancer genome-wide association study highlights three pathways and one canonical signaling cascade. Cancer Res. 70, 4453–4459 (2010).
pubmed: 20460509
pmcid: 2907250
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4502
Baranzini, S. E. et al. Pathway and network-based analysis of genome-wide association studies in multiple sclerosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 2078–2090 (2009).
pubmed: 19286671
pmcid: 2678928
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp120
Luo, L. et al. Genome-wide gene and pathway analysis. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 18, 1045–1053 (2010).
pubmed: 20442747
pmcid: 2924916
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.62
Leiserson, M. D. M. et al. Pan-cancer network analysis identifies combinations of rare somatic mutations across pathways and protein complexes. Nat. Genet. 47, 106–114 (2015).
pubmed: 25501392
doi: 10.1038/ng.3168
Petersen, A., Alvarez, C., DeClaire, S. & Tintle, N. L. Assessing methods for assigning SNPs to genes in gene-based tests of association using common variants. PLoS ONE 8, e62161 (2013).
pubmed: 23741293
pmcid: 3669368
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062161
Lamparter, D., Marbach, D., Rueedi, R., Kutalik, Z. & Bergmann, S. Fast and rigorous computation of gene and pathway scores from SNP-based summary statistics. PLOS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004714 (2016).
pubmed: 26808494
pmcid: 4726509
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004714
Marbach, D. et al. Tissue-specific regulatory circuits reveal variable modular perturbations across complex diseases. Nat. Methods 13, 366–370 (2016).
pubmed: 26950747
pmcid: 4967716
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3799
Azzato, E. M. et al. A genome-wide association study of prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 19, 1140–1143 (2010).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0085
Kiyotani, K. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies locus at 10q22 associated with clinical outcomes of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients in Japanese. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 1665–1672 (2012).
pubmed: 22180457
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr597
Shu, X. O. et al. Novel genetic markers of breast cancer survival identified by a genome-wide association study. Cancer Res. 72, 1182–1189 (2012).
pubmed: 22232737
pmcid: 3294129
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2561
Rafiq, S. et al. Identification of inherited genetic variations influencing prognosis in early-onset breast cancer. Cancer Res. 73, 1883–1891 (2013).
pubmed: 23319801
pmcid: 3601979
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3377
Han, C. H. et al. Polymorphisms in the SULF1 gene are associated with early age of onset and survival of ovarian cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 30, 5 (2011).
pubmed: 21214932
pmcid: 3025876
doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-5
Lai, J.-P., Sandhu, D. S., Shire, A. M. & Roberts, L. R. The tumor suppressor function of human sulfatase 1 (SULF1) in carcinogenesis. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 39, 149–158 (2008).
pubmed: 19373441
doi: 10.1007/s12029-009-9058-y
Emerson, C. P. et al. QSulf1, a heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatase, inhibits fibroblast growth factor signaling in mesoderm induction and angiogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 101, 4833–4838 (2004).
pubmed: 15051888
pmcid: 387334
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401028101
Ai, X. et al. QSulf1 remodels the 6-O sulfation states of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans to promote Wnt signaling. J. Cell Biol. 162, 341–351 (2003).
pubmed: 12860968
pmcid: 2172803
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200212083
Sebastian, K. et al. Characterization of SLCO5A1/OATP5A1, a solute carrier transport protein with non-classical function. PLoS ONE 8, e83257 (2013).
pubmed: 24376674
pmcid: 3869781
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083257
Cowen, L., Ideker, T., Raphael, B. J. & Sharan, R. Network propagation: a universal amplifier of genetic associations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 551–562 (2017).
pubmed: 28607512
doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.38
Nakka, P., Raphael, B. J. & Ramachandran, S. Gene and network analysis of common variants reveals novel associations in multiple complex diseases. Genetics 204, 783–798 (2016).
pubmed: 27489002
pmcid: 5068862
doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.188391
Razick, S., Magklaras, G. & Donaldson, I. M. iRefIndex: a consolidated protein interaction database with provenance. BMC Bioinform. 9, 405 (2008).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-405
Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61–70 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11412
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
pmcid: 1239896
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Joshi-Tope, G. et al. Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D428–D432 (2005).
pubmed: 15608231
doi: 10.1093/nar/gki072
Liberzon, A. et al. The Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark Gene Set Collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).
pubmed: 26771021
pmcid: 4707969
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004
Lappano, R. & Maggiolini, M. G protein-coupled receptors: novel targets for drug discovery in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 47–60 (2011).
pubmed: 21193867
doi: 10.1038/nrd3320
Kisfalvi, K., Rey, O., Young, S. H., Sinnett-Smith, J. & Rozengurt, E. Insulin potentiates Ca2+ signaling and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate hydrolysis induced by Gq protein-coupled receptor agonists through an mTOR-dependent pathway. Endocrinology 148, 3246–3257 (2007).
pubmed: 17379645
doi: 10.1210/en.2006-1711
Sassmann, A. et al. The Gq/G11-mediated signaling pathway is critical for autocrine potentiation of insulin secretion in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 2184–2193 (2010).
pubmed: 20440069
pmcid: 2877950
doi: 10.1172/JCI41541
Imamura, T. et al. G alpha-q/11 protein plays a key role in insulin-induced glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6765–6774 (1999).
pubmed: 10490615
pmcid: 84673
doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.10.6765
Nierodzik, M. L. & Karpatkin, S. Thrombin induces tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis: evidence for a thrombin-regulated dormant tumor phenotype. Cancer Cell 10, 355–362 (2006).
pubmed: 17097558
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.002
Woulfe, D. S. Platelet G protein-coupled receptors in hemostasis and thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 3, 2193–2200 (2005).
pubmed: 16194198
doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01338.x
Lal, I., Dittus, K. & Holmes, C. E. Platelets, coagulation and fibrinolysis in breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res. 15, 207 (2013).
pubmed: 23905544
pmcid: 3979075
doi: 10.1186/bcr3425
Gaucher, J., Montellier, E. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Molecular cogs: interplay between circadian clock and cell cycle. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 368–379 (2018).
pubmed: 29471986
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.01.006
Hansen, J. & Stevens, R. G. Case-control study of shift-work and breast cancer risk in Danish nurses: impact of shift systems. Eur. J. Cancer 48, 1722–1729 (2012).
pubmed: 21852111
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.005
Knutsson, A. et al. Breast cancer among shift workers: results of the WOLF longitudinal cohort study. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 39, 170–177 (2013).
pubmed: 23007867
doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3323
Travis, R. C. et al. Night shift work and breast cancer incidence: three prospective studies and meta-analysis of published studies. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 108, djw169 (2016).
pubmed: 27758828
pmcid: 5241898
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw169
Rabstein, S. et al. Night work and breast cancer estrogen receptor status-results from the German GENICA study. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 39, 448–455 (2013).
pubmed: 23543199
doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3360
Zienolddiny, S. et al. Analysis of polymorphisms in the circadian-related genes and breast cancer risk in Norwegian nurses working night shifts. Breast Cancer Res. 15, R53 (2013).
pubmed: 23822714
pmcid: 3978690
doi: 10.1186/bcr3445
Reszka, E., Przybek, M., Muurlink, O. & Pepłonska, B. Circadian gene variants and breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 390, 137–145 (2017).
pubmed: 28109907
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.01.012
Cadenas, C. et al. Loss of circadian clock gene expression is associated with tumor progression in breast cancer. Cell Cycle 13, 3282–3291 (2014).
pubmed: 25485508
pmcid: 4613905
doi: 10.4161/15384101.2014.954454
Ha, N.-H., Long, J., Cai, Q., Shu, X. O. & Hunter, K. W. The circadian rhythm gene Arntl2 is a metastasis susceptibility gene for estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006267 (2016).
pubmed: 27656887
pmcid: 5033489
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006267
Yang, X. et al. The circadian clock gene per1 suppresses cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth at specific times of day. Chronobiol. Int. 26, 1323–1339 (2009).
pubmed: 19916834
doi: 10.3109/07420520903431301
Komatsu, N. et al. The circadian gene Per1 plays an important role in cell growth and DNA damage control in human cancer cells. Mol. Cell 22, 375–382 (2006).
pubmed: 16678109
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.038
Kuo, S.-J. et al. Deregulated expression of the PER1, PER2 and PER3 genes in breast cancers. Carcinogenesis 26, 1241–1246 (2005).
pubmed: 15790588
doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi075
Unsal-Kacmaz, K., Mullen, T. E., Kaufmann, W. K. & Sancar, A. Coupling of human circadian and cell cycles by the timeless protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3109–3116 (2005).
pubmed: 15798197
pmcid: 1069621
doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.8.3109-3116.2005
Rigaill, G. et al. TIPIN depletion leads to apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Mol. Oncol. 9, 1580–1598 (2015).
pubmed: 26004086
pmcid: 5528799
doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.04.010
Ashcroft, M. et al. Human CHCHD4 mitochondrial proteins regulate cellular oxygen consumption rate and metabolism and provide a critical role in hypoxia signaling and tumor progression. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 600–611 (2012).
pubmed: 22214851
pmcid: 3266784
doi: 10.1172/JCI58780
Zhuang, J. et al. Mitochondrial disulfide relay mediates translocation of p53 and partitions its subcellular activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 17356–17361 (2013).
pubmed: 24101517
pmcid: 3808663
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310908110
Sun, Y. et al. Haploinsufficiency in the mitochondrial protein CHCHD4 reduces brain injury in a mouse model of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. Cell Death Dis. 8, e2781 (2017).
pubmed: 28492551
pmcid: 5520716
doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.196
Windham, P. F. & Tinsley, H. N. CGMP signaling as a target for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 31, 106–110 (2015).
pubmed: 24972142
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.06.006
Saravani, R., Karami-Tehrani, F., Hashemi, M., Aghaei, M. & Edalat, R. Inhibition of phosphodiestrase 9 induces cGMP accumulation and apoptosis in human breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468. Cell Prolif. 45, 199–206 (2012).
pubmed: 22469131
pmcid: 6496613
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2012.00819.x
Aznar, S. & Lacal, J. C. Rho signals to cell growth and apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 165, 1–10 (2001).
pubmed: 11248412
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00412-8
Jilg, C. A. et al. PRK1/PKN1 controls migration and metastasis of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Oncotarget 5, 12646–12664 (2014).
pubmed: 25504435
pmcid: 4350344
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2653
James, R. G. et al. Protein kinase PKN1 represses Wnt/β-catenin signaling in human melanoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 34658–34670 (2013).
pubmed: 24114839
pmcid: 3843078
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.500314
Dillon, L. & Miller, T. Therapeutic targeting of cancers with loss of PTEN function. Curr. Drug Targets 15, 65–79 (2014).
pubmed: 24387334
pmcid: 4310752
doi: 10.2174/1389450114666140106100909
Garcia-Cao, I. et al. Systemic elevation of PTEN induces a tumor-suppressive metabolic state. Cell 149, 49–62 (2012).
pubmed: 22401813
pmcid: 3319228
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.030
Chen, L. & Guo, D. The functions of tumor suppressor PTEN in innate and adaptive immunity. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 14, 581–589 (2017).
pubmed: 28603282
pmcid: 5520418
doi: 10.1038/cmi.2017.30
Neo, S. H. et al. Use of a novel cytotoxic HEXIM1 peptide in the directed breast cancer therapy. Oncotarget 7, 5483–5494 (2016).
pubmed: 26734838
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6794
Hartman, M. et al. Is breast cancer prognosis inherited? Breast Cancer Res. 9, R39 (2007).
pubmed: 17598882
pmcid: 1929105
doi: 10.1186/bcr1737
Möller, S. et al. The heritability of breast cancer among women in the nordic twin study of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 25, 145–150 (2016).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0913
Anderson, W. F., Rosenberg, P. S., Prat, A., Perou, C. M. & Sherman, M. E. How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more? J. Natl Cancer Inst. 106, 1–11 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju093
Kao, P. Y. P., Leung, K. H., Chan, L. W. C., Yip, S. P. & Yap, M. K. H. Pathway analysis of complex diseases for GWAS, extending to consider rare variants, multi-omics and interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1861, 335–353 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.11.030
Reyna, M. A., Leiserson, M. D. M. & Raphael, B. J. Hierarchical HotNet: identifying hierarchies of altered subnetworks. Bioinformatics 34, i972–i980 (2018).
pubmed: 30423088
pmcid: 6129270
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty613
Michailidou, K. et al. Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk. Nat. Genet. 45, 353–361 (2013). 361e1-2.
pubmed: 23535729
pmcid: 3771688
doi: 10.1038/ng.2563
1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467, 1061–1073 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nature09534
Delaneau, O., Marchini, J. & Zagury, J.-F. A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes. Nat. Methods 9, 179–181 (2011).
pubmed: 22138821
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1785
Howie, B., Marchini, J. & Stephens, M. Genotype imputation with thousands of genomes. G3 (Bethesda) 1, 457–470 (2011).
doi: 10.1534/g3.111.001198
Vandin, F., Clay, P., Upfal, E. & Raphael, B. J. Discovery of mutated subnetworks associated with clinical data in cancer. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 55–66 (2012).
Vandin, F., Upfal, E. & Raphael, B. J. Algorithms for detecting significantly mutated pathways in cancer. J. Comput. Biol. 18, 507–522 (2011).
pubmed: 21385051
doi: 10.1089/cmb.2010.0265
Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).
pubmed: 20808728
pmcid: 2929880
doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i01
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
pubmed: 14597658
pmcid: 403769
doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303
Calderone, A., Castagnoli, L. & Cesareni, G. mentha: a resource for browsing integrated protein-interaction networks. Nat. Methods 10, 690–691 (2013).
pubmed: 23900247
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2561
Bindea, G. et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 25, 1091–1093 (2009).
pubmed: 19237447
pmcid: 2666812
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101
Merico, D., Isserlin, R., Stueker, O., Emili, A. & Bader, G. D. Enrichment map: a network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS ONE 5, e13984 (2010).
pubmed: 21085593
pmcid: 2981572
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013984