Modified facelift approach for posterior segmental mandibulectomy: a blend of oncology and cosmesis.
Mandibulectomy
Minimal access surgery
Modified facelift approach
Neck dissection
Oral cancers
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
26
08
2019
accepted:
08
01
2020
pubmed:
18
1
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
18
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The approach to the mandible for segmental resection in malignant pathologies entails a lip-split, angle-split or visor flap incision with extension of the incision into the neck for performing neck dissection. The modified facelift approach with robot-assisted neck dissection can be used to achieve oncologically safe resections with good cosmesis. Three patients meeting the inclusion criteria underwent the procedure at the Robotic facility of HCG Cancer Centre, Bangalore. The patients were analyzed on the basis of bone defect length, the margin status of primary, functional and aesthetic outcomes. One patient had wound dehiscence and needed secondary suturing. At 6 months, patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcomes and functional results CONCLUSION: Modified facelift approach is a feasible procedure ensuring better cosmesis without compromising oncological outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The approach to the mandible for segmental resection in malignant pathologies entails a lip-split, angle-split or visor flap incision with extension of the incision into the neck for performing neck dissection. The modified facelift approach with robot-assisted neck dissection can be used to achieve oncologically safe resections with good cosmesis.
METHODS
METHODS
Three patients meeting the inclusion criteria underwent the procedure at the Robotic facility of HCG Cancer Centre, Bangalore.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The patients were analyzed on the basis of bone defect length, the margin status of primary, functional and aesthetic outcomes. One patient had wound dehiscence and needed secondary suturing. At 6 months, patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcomes and functional results CONCLUSION: Modified facelift approach is a feasible procedure ensuring better cosmesis without compromising oncological outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31950271
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05793-3
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-05793-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1205-1210Références
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;69(4):1235-41
pubmed: 20708323
Head Neck. 2013 Mar;35(3):354-60
pubmed: 22431304
Head Neck. 2014 Oct;36(10):1497-502
pubmed: 23996729
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(2 Suppl):S15-8
pubmed: 17848283
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Nov;39(11):1066-73
pubmed: 20655175
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):e23-30
pubmed: 26758757
Laryngoscope. 2011 Aug;121(8):1636-41
pubmed: 21721012
Nepal J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 31;6(4):613-619
pubmed: 28804673