Identifying Adolescents at Risk for Depression: A Prediction Score Performance in Cohorts Based in 3 Different Continents.
adolescent
cohort studies
depression
prognosis
risk assessment
Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
ISSN: 1527-5418
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8704565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
revised:
19
12
2019
accepted:
08
01
2020
pubmed:
19
1
2020
medline:
20
4
2021
entrez:
19
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prediction models have become frequent in the medical literature, but most published studies are conducted in a single setting. Heterogeneity between development and validation samples has been posited as a major obstacle for the generalization of models. We aimed to develop a multivariable prognostic model using sociodemographic variables easily obtainable from adolescents at age 15 to predict a depressive disorder diagnosis at age 18 and to evaluate its generalizability in 2 samples from diverse socioeconomic and cultural settings. Data from the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort were used to develop the prediction model, and its generalizability was evaluated in 2 representative cohort studies: the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study and the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. At age 15, 2,192 adolescents with no evidence of current or previous depression were included (44.6% male). The apparent C-statistic of the models derived in Pelotas ranged from 0.76 to 0.79, and the model obtained from a penalized logistic regression was selected for subsequent external evaluation. Major discrepancies between the samples were identified, impacting the external prognostic performance of the model (Dunedin and E-Risk C-statistics of 0.63 and 0.59, respectively). The implementation of recommended strategies to account for this heterogeneity among samples improved the model's calibration in both samples. An adolescent depression risk score comprising easily obtainable predictors was developed with good prognostic performance in a Brazilian sample. Heterogeneity among settings was not trivial, but strategies to deal with sample diversity were identified as pivotal for providing better risk stratification across samples. Future efforts should focus on developing better methodological approaches for incorporating heterogeneity in prognostic research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31953186
pii: S0890-8567(20)30007-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.12.004
pmc: PMC8215370
mid: NIHMS1701860
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
262-273Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P2C HD065563
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P005918/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD077482
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G1002190
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_MR/R019460/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG032282
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 15;32(18):3158-80
pubmed: 23307585
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;65(12):1368-76
pubmed: 19047523
Hepatology. 2001 Feb;33(2):464-70
pubmed: 11172350
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 May;50(5):679-93
pubmed: 25835958
Br J Cancer. 2016 Dec 6;115(12):1471-1478
pubmed: 27802449
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):493-500
pubmed: 28355424
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;43(1):63-70
pubmed: 14691361
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;175(9):831-844
pubmed: 29621902
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):25-34
pubmed: 25441703
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Apr 25;45(3):562-570
pubmed: 29897527
Circulation. 2008 Feb 12;117(6):743-53
pubmed: 18212285
BMJ. 2011 Nov 28;343:d7163
pubmed: 22123912
BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3140
pubmed: 27334381
Psychol Med. 2017 May;47(7):1163-1178
pubmed: 28091343
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1185-1186
pubmed: 29094142
World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):192-207
pubmed: 31059629
Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1056-67
pubmed: 22305766
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;72(1):49-57
pubmed: 25390793
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381
pubmed: 23393430
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;56:29-34
pubmed: 25266848
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):359-66
pubmed: 24233052
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;170(1):59-70
pubmed: 23111466
Heart. 2012 May;98(9):691-8
pubmed: 22397946
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:245-7
pubmed: 25981519
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63
pubmed: 25560714
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;57(10):755-763.e4
pubmed: 30274650
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;3(4):211-213
pubmed: 30878111
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;68(3):279-89
pubmed: 25179855
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;37(4):704-9
pubmed: 17846051
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):133-142
pubmed: 29856558
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;43(6):727-42
pubmed: 12236608
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 1;75(12):1289-1297
pubmed: 30347013
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 09;(8):CD003380
pubmed: 27501438
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:40-50
pubmed: 26142114
JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):180-7
pubmed: 11448281