Risk of Death and Amputation with Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the Infrapopliteal Arteries for Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Amputation, Surgical
/ adverse effects
Angioplasty, Balloon
/ adverse effects
Cardiovascular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Critical Illness
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Ischemia
/ diagnosis
Limb Salvage
Male
Middle Aged
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Peripheral Arterial Disease
/ diagnosis
Popliteal Artery
/ physiopathology
Progression-Free Survival
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Vascular Patency
Journal
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
ISSN: 1535-7732
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Interv Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203369
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
10
10
2019
revised:
12
11
2019
accepted:
14
11
2019
pubmed:
20
1
2020
medline:
9
9
2020
entrez:
20
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A formal systematic review and study-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating treatment of the infrapopliteal arteries with paclitaxel-coated balloons compared with conventional balloon angioplasty for critical limb ischemia (CLI) was conducted. Medical databases and online content were last screened in September 2019. The primary safety and efficacy endpoint was amputation-free survival defined as freedom from all-cause death and major amputation. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) constituted a secondary efficacy endpoint. Summary effects were synthesized with a random-effects model. Some 8 randomized controlled trials with 1,420 patients (97% CLI) were analyzed up to 1 year follow-up. Amputation-free survival was significantly worse in case of paclitaxel (13.7% crude risk of death or limb loss compared to 9.4% in case of uncoated balloon angioplasty; hazard ratio 1.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.07, p = .008). TLR was significantly reduced in case of paclitaxel (11.8% crude risk of TLR versus 25.6% in control; risk ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.81, p = .004). The harm signal was evident when examining the high-dose (3.0-3.5 μg/mm
Identifiants
pubmed: 31954604
pii: S1051-0443(19)30955-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.11.015
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
202-212Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 SIR. All rights reserved.