Reductions in body sway responses to a rhythmic support surface tilt perturbation can be caused by other mechanisms than prediction.
Adaptation
Balance learning
Perturbed stance
Postural control
Standing balance
Support surface tilt
Journal
Experimental brain research
ISSN: 1432-1106
Titre abrégé: Exp Brain Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0043312
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
25
09
2019
accepted:
02
01
2020
pubmed:
20
1
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
entrez:
20
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Studies investigating balance control often use external perturbations to probe the system. These perturbations can be administered as randomized, pseudo-randomized, or predictable sequences. As predictability of a given perturbation can affect balance performance, the way those perturbations are constructed may affect the results of the experiments. In the present study, we hypothesized that subjects are able to adapt to short, rhythmic support surface tilt stimuli, but not to long pseudo-random stimuli. 19 subjects were standing with eyes closed on a servo-controlled platform tilting about the ankle joint axis. Pre and post to the learning intervention, pseudo-random tilt sequences were applied. For the learning phase, a rhythmic and easy-to-memorize 8-s long sequence was applied 75 times, where subjects were instructed to stand as still as possible. Body kinematics were measured and whole body center of mass sway was analyzed. Results showed reduced sway and less forward lean of the body across the learning phase. The sway reductions were similar for stimulus and non-stimulus frequencies. Surprisingly, for the pseudo-random sequences, comparable changes were found from pre- to post-tests. In summary, results confirmed that considerable adaptations exist when exposing subjects to an 8-s long rhythmic perturbation. No indications of predictions of the learning tilt sequence were found, since similar changes were also observed in response to pseudo-random sequences. We conclude that changes in body sway responses following 75 repetitions of an 8-s long rhythmic tilt sequence are due to adaptations in the dynamics of the control mechanism (presumably stiffness).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31955233
doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05723-z
pii: 10.1007/s00221-020-05723-z
pmc: PMC7007899
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
465-476Subventions
Organisme : AFF Universität Konstanz
ID : 83945418
Références
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116061
pubmed: 31374329
J Neurophysiol. 2014 May;111(9):1852-64
pubmed: 24501263
J Physiol Paris. 2009 Sep-Dec;103(3-5):178-94
pubmed: 19665555
Front Comput Neurosci. 2018 Mar 20;12:13
pubmed: 29615886
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 08;11(3):e0151012
pubmed: 26953694
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug 1;116(2):272-85
pubmed: 27075544
J Mot Behav. 1996 Dec;28(4):291-8
pubmed: 14769551
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1097-118
pubmed: 12205132
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Feb;124(3):331-41
pubmed: 9989439
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;187(4):603-11
pubmed: 18327574
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 30;10:419
pubmed: 27625599
Hum Mov Sci. 2014 Oct;37:123-46
pubmed: 25150802
J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Jun 30;145(1-2):175-203
pubmed: 15922036
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Aug;204(4):505-14
pubmed: 20544184
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Nov;223(1):99-108
pubmed: 22965550
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Jun;14(1):164-76
pubmed: 12063140
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Nov;199(2):185-93
pubmed: 19756552
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Oct 27;11:99
pubmed: 29163116
Exp Brain Res. 2006 May;171(2):231-50
pubmed: 16307252
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Jun;41:147-64
pubmed: 25816794
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Sep;81(9):1217-23
pubmed: 10987165
Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Apr;30(2):262-78
pubmed: 21440318
J Neurophysiol. 1999 May;81(5):2325-39
pubmed: 10322069
Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 13;9:1045
pubmed: 30619027
Exp Brain Res. 1993;93(2):352-62
pubmed: 8491275
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Dec;44:22-31
pubmed: 26298214
Phys Ther. 1997 May;77(5):517-33
pubmed: 9149762
Prog Brain Res. 2003;142:189-201
pubmed: 12693262
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(4):450-9
pubmed: 15480604