Paramedic Global Impression of Change During Prehospital Evaluation and Transport for Acute Stroke.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Allied Health Personnel
Brain Ischemia
/ diagnosis
Disease Progression
Double-Blind Method
Emergency Medical Services
Female
Glasgow Coma Scale
Humans
Intracranial Hemorrhages
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Nervous System Diseases
/ etiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Stroke
/ diagnosis
Transportation of Patients
Treatment Outcome
Glasgow Coma Scale
ambulances
documentation
intracranical hemorrhage
triage
Journal
Stroke
ISSN: 1524-4628
Titre abrégé: Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0235266
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
21
1
2020
medline:
20
6
2020
entrez:
21
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background and Purpose- The prehospital setting is a promising site for therapeutic intervention in stroke, but current stroke screening tools do not account for the evolution of neurological symptoms in this early period. We developed and validated the Paramedic Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale in a large, prospective, randomized trial. Methods- In the prehospital FAST-MAG (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium) randomized trial conducted from 2005 to 2013, EMS providers were asked to complete the PGIC Scale (5-point Likert scale values: 1-much improved, 2-mildly improved, 3-unchanged, 4-mildly worsened, 5-much worsened) for neurological symptom change during transport for consecutive patients transported by ambulance within 2 hours of onset. We analyzed PGIC concurrent validity (compared with change in Glasgow Coma Scale, Los Angeles Motor Scale), convergent validity (compared with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale severity measure performed in the emergency department), and predictive validity (of neurological deterioration after hospital arrival and of final 90-day functional outcome). We used PGIC to characterize differential prehospital course among stroke subtypes. Results- Paramedics completed the PGIC in 1691 of 1700 subjects (99.5%), among whom 635 (37.5%) had neurological deficit evolution (32% improvement, 5.5% worsening) during a median prehospital care period of 33 (IQR, 27-39) minutes. Improvement was associated with diagnosis of cerebral ischemia rather than intracranial hemorrhage, milder stroke deficits on emergency department arrival, and more frequent nondisabled and independent 3-month outcomes. Conversely, worsening on the PGIC was associated with intracranial hemorrhage, more severe neurological deficits on emergency department arrival, more frequent treatment with thrombolytic therapy, and poor disability outcome at 3 months. Conclusions- The PGIC scale is a simple, validated measure of prehospital patient course that has the potential to provide information useful to emergency department decision-making. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00059332.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31955642
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026392
pmc: PMC7091257
mid: NIHMS1549137
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00059332']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
784-791Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS044364
Pays : United States
Références
Stroke. 1997 Dec;28(12):2370-5
pubmed: 9412616
Stroke. 2000 Nov;31(11):2591-6
pubmed: 11062280
Neurology. 2006 Apr 25;66(8):1175-81
pubmed: 16636233
JAMA. 2012 Mar 14;307(10):1026-8
pubmed: 22416095
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88
pubmed: 27673305
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):87-91
pubmed: 24281224
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Nov 1;75(11):1364-1374
pubmed: 30039165
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Apr;33(4):373-8
pubmed: 10092713
Stroke. 1997 Jan;28(1):1-5
pubmed: 8996478
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
Int J Stroke. 2014 Feb;9(2):215-9
pubmed: 24444116
Stroke. 2007 Nov;38(11):3097-115
pubmed: 17901393
JAMA. 2015 Feb 24;313(8):824-36
pubmed: 25710659
Stroke. 2000 Jan;31(1):71-6
pubmed: 10625718
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004 Jan-Mar;8(1):46-50
pubmed: 14691787
JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70(9):1126-32
pubmed: 23817961
Stroke. 2005 Mar;36(3):690-703
pubmed: 15689577
Stroke. 2010 May;41(5):992-5
pubmed: 20360551
Singapore Med J. 2003 Dec;44(12):614-9
pubmed: 14770254
Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3120-8
pubmed: 24003041
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(6):539-44
pubmed: 19844092
Circulation. 2007 Oct 16;116(16):e391-413
pubmed: 17938297
Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2651-65
pubmed: 21868727
Int J Stroke. 2014 Feb;9(2):220-5
pubmed: 24444117
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):262-9
pubmed: 23633218
Lancet. 2014 Nov 29;384(9958):1929-35
pubmed: 25106063
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):153-9
pubmed: 19291550
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1651-3
pubmed: 27143274
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):272-7
pubmed: 12545028
Stroke. 2001 Jan;32(1):63-9
pubmed: 11136916
JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2480-8
pubmed: 23780461
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(1-2):189-91
pubmed: 18219200
Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1783-7
pubmed: 8841330
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):528-36
pubmed: 25651247
Stroke. 1997 Aug;28(8):1530-40
pubmed: 9259745
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):3020-35
pubmed: 26123479