Targeting of EGFR by a combination of antibodies mediates unconventional EGFR trafficking and degradation.
Antibodies
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ pharmacology
Antineoplastic Agents
Cell Membrane
/ metabolism
Cells, Cultured
DNA-Binding Proteins
Endocytosis
/ drug effects
Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport
Endosomes
/ metabolism
ErbB Receptors
/ metabolism
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Humans
Lysosomes
/ metabolism
Phosphoproteins
Protein Transport
Receptors, Cell Surface
Transcription Factors
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 01 2020
20 01 2020
Historique:
received:
16
09
2019
accepted:
02
12
2019
entrez:
22
1
2020
pubmed:
22
1
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antibody combinations targeting cell surface receptors are a new modality of cancer therapy. The trafficking and signalling mechanisms regulated by such therapeutics are not fully understood but could underlie differential tumour responses. We explored EGFR trafficking upon treatment with the antibody combination Sym004 which has shown promise clinically. Sym004 promoted EGFR endocytosis distinctly from EGF: it was asynchronous, not accompanied by canonical signalling events and involved EGFR clustering within detergent-insoluble plasma mebrane-associated tubules. Sym004 induced lysosomal degradation independently of EGFR ubiquitylation but dependent upon Hrs/Tsg101 that are required for the formation of intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) within late endosomes. We propose Sym004 cross-links EGFR physically triggering EGFR endocytosis and incorporation onto ILVs and so Sym004 sensitivity correlates with EGFR numbers available for binding, rather than specific signalling events. Consistently Sym004 efficacy and potentiation of cisplatin responses correlated with EGFR surface expression in head and neck cancer cells. These findings will have implications in understanding the mode of action of this new class of cancer therapeutics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31959764
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57153-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-57153-9
pmc: PMC6970994
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
DNA-Binding Proteins
0
Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport
0
Phosphoproteins
0
Receptors, Cell Surface
0
Transcription Factors
0
Tsg101 protein
0
hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate
0
futuximab
B37J680LX0
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
663Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G1001684
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Tebbutt, N., Pedersen, M. W. & Johns, T. G. Targeting the ERBB family in cancer: couples therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer 13, 663, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3559 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nrc3559
pubmed: 23949426
Corraliza-Gorjón, I., Somovilla-Crespo, B., Santamaria, S., Garcia-Sanz, J. & Kremer, L. New Strategies Using Antibody Combinations to Increase Cancer Treatment Effectiveness. Frontiers in Immunology 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01804 (2017).
Napolitano, S. et al. Antitumor efficacy of triple monoclonal antibody inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with MM151 in EGFR-dependent and in cetuximab-resistant human colorectal cancer cells. Oncotarget 8, 82773–82783, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19797 (2017).
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19797
pubmed: 29137301
pmcid: 5669927
Grandal, M. M. et al. Simultaneous Targeting of Two Distinct Epitopes on MET Effectively Inhibits MET- and HGF-Driven Tumor Growth by Multiple Mechanisms. Molecular cancer therapeutics 16, 2780–2791, https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-17-0374 (2017).
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-17-0374
pubmed: 28802255
Spangler, J. B. et al. Combination antibody treatment down-regulates epidermal growth factor receptor by inhibiting endosomal recycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 13252–13257, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913476107 (2010).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913476107
pubmed: 20616078
pmcid: 2922117
Friedman, L. M. et al. Synergistic down-regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases by combinations of mAbs: Implications for cancer immunotherapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 1915–1920, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409610102 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409610102
pubmed: 15684082
pmcid: 548578
Berger, C., Madshus, I. H. & Stang, E. Cetuximab in combination with anti-human IgG antibodies efficiently down-regulates the EGF receptor by macropinocytosis. Experimental Cell Research 318, 2578–2591, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.09.001 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.09.001
pubmed: 22975728
Szymanska, M. et al. A combination of two antibodies recognizing non-overlapping epitopes of HER2 induces kinase activity-dependent internalization of HER2. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 20, 1999–2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12899 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12899
pubmed: 27469139
pmcid: 5020627
Pedersen, M. W. et al. Sym004: A Novel Synergistic Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Mixture with Superior Anticancer Efficacy. Cancer Research 70, 588–597, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-1417 (2010).
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-1417
pubmed: 20068188
Montagut, C. et al. Efficacy of Sym004 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Acquired Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapy and Molecularly Selected by Circulating Tumor DNA Analyses A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama Oncology 4, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5245 (2018).
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5245
Koefoed, K. et al. Rational identification of an optimal antibody mixture for targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Mabs 3, 584–595, https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.3.6.17955 (2011).
doi: 10.4161/mabs.3.6.17955
pubmed: 22123060
pmcid: 3242845
Liao, H. J. & Carpenter, G. Cetuximab/C225-Induced Intracellular Trafficking of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Cancer Research 69, 6179–6183, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0049 (2009).
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0049
pubmed: 19602593
pmcid: 2753411
Aguet, F., Antonescu, C. N., Mettlen, M., Schmid, S. L. & Danuser, G. Advances in Analysis of Low Signal-to-Noise Images Link Dynamin and AP2 to the Functions of an Endocytic Checkpoint. Developmental Cell 26, 279–291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2013.06.019 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.06.019
pubmed: 23891661
pmcid: 3939604
Ahsan, A. et al. Role of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Degradation in Cisplatin-Induced Cytotoxicity in Head and Neck Cancer. Cancer Research 70, 2862–2869, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-4294 (2010).
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-4294
pubmed: 20215522
pmcid: 2848889
Melikova, M. S., Kondratov, K. A. & Kornilova, E. S. Two different stages of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor endocytosis are sensitive to free ubiquitin depletion produced by proteasome inhibitor MG132. Cell Biology International 30, 31–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.09.003 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.09.003
pubmed: 16275144
Mauvezin, C., Nagy, P., Juhasz, G. & Neufeld, T. P. Autophagosome-lysosome fusion is independent of V-ATPase-mediated acidification. Nature Communications 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8007 (2015).
Yoshimori, T., Yamamoto, A., Moriyama, Y., Futai, M. & Tashiro, Y. BAFILOMYCIN-A1, A SPECIFIC INHIBITOR OF VACUOLAR-TYPE H+-ATPASE, INHIBITS ACIDIFICATION AND PROTEIN-DEGRADATION IN LYSOSOMES OF CULTURED-CELLS. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17707–17712 (1991).
pubmed: 1832676
Kalaidzidis, I. et al. APPL endosomes are not obligatory endocytic intermediates but act as stable cargo-sorting compartments. Journal of Cell Biology 211, 123–144, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201311117 (2015).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201311117
pubmed: 26459602
White, I. J., Bailey, L. M., Aghakhani, M. R., Moss, S. E. & Futter, C. E. EGF stimulates annexin 1-dependent inward vesiculation in a multivesicular endosome subpopulation. Embo Journal 25, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600759 (2006).
doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600759
pubmed: 16052208
Tomas, A. et al. WASH and Tsg101/ALIX-dependent diversion of stress-internalized EGFR from the canonical endocytic pathway. Nature Communications 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8324 (2015).
Wang, H. P. et al. Analysis of nondegradative protein ubiquitylation with a monoclonal antibody specific for lysine-63-linked polyubiquitin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 20197–20202, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810461105 (2008).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810461105
pubmed: 19091944
pmcid: 2629300
Sigismund, S. et al. Threshold-controlled ubiquitination of the EGFR directs receptor fate. Embo Journal 32, 2140–2157, https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.149 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.149
pubmed: 23799367
Pennock, S. & Wang, Z. X. A tale of two Cbls: Interplay of c-Cbl and Cbl-b in epidermal growth factor receptor downregulation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 28, 3020–3037, https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01809-07 (2008).
doi: 10.1128/mcb.01809-07
pubmed: 18316398
pmcid: 2293090
Jones, S. & Rappoport, J. Z. Interdependent epidermal growth factor receptor signalling and trafficking. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 51, 23–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioce1.2014.03.014 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.bioce1.2014.03.014
Huang, F. T., Kirkpatrick, D., Jiang, X. J., Gygi, S. & Sorkin, A. Differential regulation of EGF receptor internalization and degradation by multiubiquitination within the kinase domain. Molecular Cell 21, 737–748, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.018 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.018
pubmed: 16543144
Sigismund, S. et al. Clathrin-independent endocytosis of ubiquitinated cargos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 2760–2765, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409817102 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409817102
pubmed: 15701692
pmcid: 549482
Razi, M. & Futter, C. E. Distinct roles for Tsg101 and Hrs in multivesicular body formation and inward vesiculation. Molecular Biology of the Cell 17, 3469–3483, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-11-1054 (2006).
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-11-1054
pubmed: 16707569
pmcid: 1525239
Chamberland, J. P. & Ritter, B. Retromer revisited: Evolving roles for retromer in endosomal sorting. Journal of Cell Biology 216, 3433–3436, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201708111 (2017).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201708111
pubmed: 29061649
Huang, S. et al. Sym004, a Novel Anti-EGFR Antibody Mixture, Augments Radiation Response in Human Lung and Head and Neck Cancers. Molecular cancer therapeutics 12, 2772–2781, https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-13-0587 (2013).
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-13-0587
pubmed: 24130052
pmcid: 3960925
Jones, S., Cunningham, D. L., Rappoport, J. Z. & Heath, J. K. The non-receptor tyrosine kinase Ack1 regulates the fate of activated EGFR by inducing trafficking to the p62/NBR1 pre-autophagosome. Journal of Cell Science 127, 994–1006, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.136895 (2014).
doi: 10.1242/jcs.136895
pubmed: 24413169
Lin, Q. et al. HECT E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4-1 Ubiquitinates ACK and Regulates Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF)-Induced Degradation of EGF Receptor and ACK. Molecular and Cellular Biology 30, 1541–1554, https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00013-10 (2010).
doi: 10.1128/mcb.00013-10
pubmed: 20086093
pmcid: 2832494
Tomas, A., Jones, S., Vaughan, S. O., Hochhauser, D. & CE, F. Stress-specific p38 MAPK activation is sufficient to drive EGFR endocytosis but not its nuclear translocation. Journal of Cell Science 130, 10 (2017).
doi: 10.1242/jcs.202358
Frey, M. R., Dise, R. S., Edelblum, K. L. & Polk, D. B. p38 kinase regulates epidermal growth factor receptor downregulation and cellular migration. The EMBO Journal 25, 5683–5692, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601457 (2006).
doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601457
pubmed: 17139251
pmcid: 1698902
Moody, P. R. et al. Receptor Crosslinking: A General Method to Trigger Internalization and Lysosomal Targeting of Therapeutic Receptor:Ligand Complexes. Molecular Therapy 23, 1888–1898, https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2015.178 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.178
pubmed: 26412588
pmcid: 4700114
Sigismund, S. et al. Clathrin-mediated internalization is essential for sustained EGFR signaling but dispensable for degradation. Dev Cell 15, 209–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.012 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.012
pubmed: 18694561
Mayor, S., Parton, R. G. & Donaldson, J. G. Clathrin-Independent Pathways of Endocytosis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 6, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016758 (2014).
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016758
Damke, H., Baba, T., Warnock, D. E. & Schmid, S. L. INDUCTION OF MUTANT DYNAMIN SPECIFICALLY BLOCKS ENDOCYTIC COATED VESICLE FORMATION. Journal of Cell Biology 127, 915–934, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.127.4.915 (1994).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.4.915
pubmed: 7962076
Johannes, L. Shiga ToxinA Model for Glycolipid-Dependent and Lectin-Driven Endocytosis. Toxins 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9110340 (2017).
doi: 10.3390/toxins9110340
Watanabe, S. & Boucrot, E. Fast and ultrafast endocytosis. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 47, 64–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2017.02.013 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.02.013
pubmed: 28391090
Tym, J. E. et al. canSAR: an updated cancer research and drug discovery knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Research 44, D938–D943, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1030 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1030
pubmed: 26673713
Mancini, M. et al. Combining three antibodies nullifies feedback-mediated resistance to erlotinib in lung cancer. Science Signaling 8, https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aaa0725 (2015).
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaa0725
Tan, X. J., Lambert, P. F., Rapraeger, A. C. & Anderson, R. A. Stress-Induced EGFR Trafficking: Mechanisms, Functions, and Therapeutic Implications. Trends in Cell Biology 26, 352–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2015.12.006 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.12.006
pubmed: 26827089
pmcid: 5120732
Kato, K. et al. Phase I dose-escalation trial of Sym004, a mixture of two anti-EGFR antibodies, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 34, 2522–2522, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.2522 (2016).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.2522
Machiels, J. P. et al. A proof of concept trial of the anti-EGFR antibody mixture Sym004 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 76, 13–20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2761-4 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00280-015-2761-4
pubmed: 25952795
Schuh, A. L. & Audhya, A. The ESCRT machinery: From the plasma membrane to endosomes and back again. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 49, 242–261, https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2014.881777 (2014).
doi: 10.3109/10409238.2014.881777
pubmed: 24456136
pmcid: 4381963
Williams, R. L. & Urbe, S. The emerging shape of the ESCRT machinery. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8, 355–368, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2162 (2007).
doi: 10.1038/nrm2162
pubmed: 17450176
Johannes, L., Wunder, C. & Bassereau, P. Bending “On the Rocks”-A Cocktail of Biophysical Modules to Build Endocytic Pathways. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 6, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016741 (2014).
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016741
Pezeshkian, W. et al. Mechanism of Shiga Toxin Clustering on Membranes. Acs Nano 11, 314–324, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b05706 (2017).
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05706
pubmed: 27943675
Johannes, L. & Romer, W. Shiga toxins - from cell biology to biomedical applications. Nature Reviews Microbiology 8, 105–116, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2279 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2279
pubmed: 20023663
Renard, H.-F. et al. Endophilin-A2 functions in membrane scission in clathrin-independent endocytosis. Nature 517, 493, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14064 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nature14064
pubmed: 25517096
pmcid: 4342003
Romer, W. et al. Shiga toxin induces tubular membrane invaginations for its uptake into cells. Nature 450, 670–U673, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05996 (2007).
doi: 10.1038/nature05996
pubmed: 18046403
Schuller, S. Shiga Toxin Interaction with Human Intestinal Epithelium. Toxins 3, 626–639, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3060626 (2011).
doi: 10.3390/toxins3060626
pubmed: 22069729
pmcid: 3202847
Matsuo, H. et al. Role of LBPA and Alix in multivesicular liposome formation and endosome organization. Science 303, 531–534, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092425 (2004).
doi: 10.1126/science.1092425
pubmed: 14739459
Delos Santos, R. C. et al. Selective regulation of clathrin-mediated epidermal growth factor receptor signaling and endocytosis by phospholipase C and calcium. Molecular Biology of the Cell 28, 2802–2818, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-12-0871 (2017).
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-12-0871
pubmed: 28814502
pmcid: 5638584
Bolte, S. & Cordelieres, F. P. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. Journal of Microscopy-Oxford 224, 213–232, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x (2006).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 671–675, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
pubmed: 22930834
pmcid: 5554542
Bone, L. N. et al. The acyltransferase LYCAT controls specific phosphoinositides and related membrane traffic. Molecular Biology of the Cell 28, 161–172, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-09-0668 (2017).
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-09-0668
pubmed: 28035047
pmcid: 5221620
Slot, J. W. & Geuze, H. J. A NEW METHOD OF PREPARING GOLD PROBES FOR MULTIPLE-LABELING CYTO-CHEMISTRY. European Journal of Cell Biology 38, 87–93 (1985).
pubmed: 4029177
Tomas, A., Futter, C. & Moss, S. E. Annexin 11 is required for midbody formation and completion of the terminal phase of cytokinesis. Journal of Cell Biology 165, 813–822, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200311054 (2004).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200311054
pubmed: 15197175
Udeshi, N. D. et al. Refined preparation and use of anti-diglycine remnant (K-ε-GG) antibody enables routine quantification of 10,000s of ubiquitination sites in single proteomics experiments. Mol Cell Proteomics 12, 825–831, https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.O112.027094 (2013).
doi: 10.1074/mcp.O112.027094
pubmed: 23266961
Shevchenko, A., Tomas, H., Havli, J., Olsen, J. V. & Mann, M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nature Protocols 1, 2856–2860, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.468 (2006).
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.468
pubmed: 17406544
pmcid: 17406544
Lafont, E. et al. TBK1 and IKKε prevent TNF-induced cell death by RIPK1 phosphorylation. Nature Cell Biology 20, 1389–1399, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0229-6 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0229-6
pubmed: 30420664
pmcid: 6268100
Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nature Biotechnology 26, 1367–1372, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1511 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511
Choi, M. et al. MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics 30, 2524–2526, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu305 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu305
pubmed: 24794931
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology 57, 289–300 (1995).
Mellacheruvu, D. et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nature Methods 10, 730-+, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2557 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2557
pubmed: 23921808
pmcid: 3773500
Alanko, J. et al. Integrin endosomal signalling suppresses anoikis. Nature Cell Biology 17, 1412–1421, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3250 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncb3250
pubmed: 26436690
pmcid: 4890650
Vichai, V. & Kirtikara, K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nature Protocols 1, 1112–1116, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.179 (2006).
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.179
pubmed: 17406391
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Research 47, D442–D450, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1106 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106
pmcid: 6323896
Omasits, U., Ahrens, C. H., Muller, S. & Wollscheid, B. Protter: interactive protein feature visualization and integration with experimental proteomic data. Bioinformatics 30, 884–886, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt607 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt607
pubmed: 24162465