Compression analysis of the gray and white matter of the spinal cord.
biomechanical study
cervical spondylotic myelopathy
collapse rate
compression
gray matter
mechanical properties
spinal cord injury
white matter
Journal
Neural regeneration research
ISSN: 1673-5374
Titre abrégé: Neural Regen Res
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101316351
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
22
1
2020
pubmed:
22
1
2020
medline:
22
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The spinal cord is composed of gray matter and white matter. It is well known that the properties of these two tissues differ considerably. Spinal diseases often present with symptoms that are caused by spinal cord compression. Understanding the mechanical properties of gray and white matter would allow us to gain a deep understanding of the injuries caused to the spinal cord and provide information on the pathological changes to these distinct tissues in several disorders. Previous studies have reported on the physical properties of gray and white matter, however, these were focused on longitudinal tension tests. Little is known about the differences between gray and white matter in terms of their response to compression. We therefore performed mechanical compression test of the gray and white matter of spinal cords harvested from cows and analyzed the differences between them in response to compression. We conducted compression testing of gray matter and white matter to detect possible differences in the collapse rate. We found that increased compression (especially more than 50% compression) resulted in more severe injuries to both the gray and white matter. The present results on the mechanical differences between gray and white matter in response to compression will be useful when interpreting findings from medical imaging in patients with spinal conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31960823
pii: NeuralRegenRes_2020_15_7_1344_272604
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.272604
pmc: PMC7047803
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1344-1349Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
J Neurol. 1996 Feb;243(2):109-16
pubmed: 8750545
Neurol Res. 1992 Sep;14(4):312-4
pubmed: 1360625
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Feb;(359):18-26
pubmed: 10078125
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Mar;15(3):2824-2829
pubmed: 29599828
Neural Regen Res. 2015 Nov;10(11):1869-73
pubmed: 26807127
Brain. 1995 Feb;118 ( Pt 1):263-78
pubmed: 7895010
Neurosurgery. 2005 May;56(5):1101-13; discussion 1101-13
pubmed: 15854260
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Aug 1;20(15):1657-63
pubmed: 7482013
J Neurosurg. 1993 Oct;79(4):550-61
pubmed: 8410225
J Neurosurg. 1968 Jun;28(6):565-81
pubmed: 5671293
Lancet. 1953 Apr 11;1(6763):717-20
pubmed: 13036140
J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Jul;35(4):256-61
pubmed: 22925752
J Neurotrauma. 2001 Mar;18(3):361-7
pubmed: 11284555
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Nov;15(11):1088-96
pubmed: 2267602
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Apr 1;21(7):827-33
pubmed: 8779013
J Neurol. 1997 Apr;244(4):222-9
pubmed: 9112590
Neurology. 1962 Aug;12:513-9
pubmed: 14485123
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(5):518-22
pubmed: 22118260