Effect of Renal Denervation and Catheter Ablation vs Catheter Ablation Alone on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Among Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension: The ERADICATE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aged
Antihypertensive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation
/ complications
Catheter Ablation
Combined Modality Therapy
Drug Resistance
Female
Humans
Hypertension
/ complications
Kidney
/ innervation
Male
Middle Aged
Pulmonary Veins
/ surgery
Secondary Prevention
Single-Blind Method
Sympathectomy
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 01 2020
21 01 2020
Historique:
entrez:
22
1
2020
pubmed:
22
1
2020
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Renal denervation can reduce cardiac sympathetic activity that may result in an antiarrhythmic effect on atrial fibrillation. To determine whether renal denervation when added to pulmonary vein isolation enhances long-term antiarrhythmic efficacy. The Evaluate Renal Denervation in Addition to Catheter Ablation to Eliminate Atrial Fibrillation (ERADICATE-AF) trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at 5 referral centers for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the Russian Federation, Poland, and Germany. A total of 302 patients with hypertension despite taking at least 1 antihypertensive medication, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and plans for ablation were enrolled from April 2013 to March 2018. Follow-up concluded in March 2019. Patients were randomized to either pulmonary vein isolation alone (n = 148) or pulmonary vein isolation plus renal denervation (n = 154). Complete pulmonary vein isolation to v an end point of elimination of all pulmonary vein potentials; renal denervation using an irrigated-tip ablation catheter delivering radiofrequency energy to discrete sites in a spiral pattern from distal to proximal in both renal arteries. The primary end point was freedom from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia at 12 months. Secondary end points included procedural complications within 30 days and blood pressure control at 6 and 12 months. Of the 302 randomized patients (median age, 60 years [interquartile range, 55-65 years]; 182 men [60.3%]), 283 (93.7%) completed the trial. All successfully underwent their assigned procedures. Freedom from atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardia at 12 months was observed in 84 of 148 (56.5%) of those undergoing pulmonary vein isolation alone and in 111 of 154 (72.1%) of those undergoing pulmonary vein isolation plus renal denervation (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.85; P = .006). Of 5 prespecified secondary end points, 4 are reported and 3 differed between groups. Mean systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months decreased from 151 mm Hg to 147 mm Hg in the isolation-only group and from 150 mm Hg to 135 mm Hg in the renal denervation group (between-group difference, -13 mm Hg; 95% CI, -15 to -11 mm Hg; P < .001). Procedural complications occurred in 7 patients (4.7%) in the isolation-only group and 7 (4.5%) of the renal denervation group. Among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and hypertension, renal denervation added to catheter ablation, compared with catheter ablation alone, significantly increased the likelihood of freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12 months. The lack of a formal sham-control renal denervation procedure should be considered in interpreting the results of this trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01873352.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31961420
pii: 2759005
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21187
pmc: PMC6990678
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01873352']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
248-255Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Hypertension. 2013 Feb;61(2):457-64
pubmed: 23172929
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2335-2345
pubmed: 29803590
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014 Nov;67(11):881-2
pubmed: 25242659
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1275-1285
pubmed: 30874716
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;35(2):119-25
pubmed: 22869391
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Mar;4(3 Suppl):S1-6
pubmed: 17336876
PLoS One. 2013 May 27;8(5):e64611
pubmed: 23724069
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jun;16(6):608-13
pubmed: 24644008
JAMA. 2017 Jan 10;317(2):165-182
pubmed: 28097354
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Apr;11(4):541-6
pubmed: 24389229
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1261-1274
pubmed: 30874766
Lancet. 2017 Nov 11;390(10108):2160-2170
pubmed: 28859944
Europace. 2015 Apr;17(4):647-54
pubmed: 25349225
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1672-3
pubmed: 23597574
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;37(10):1357-66
pubmed: 24888398
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 10;370(15):1393-401
pubmed: 24678939
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Oct;105(10):873-9
pubmed: 27364940
Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):157-208
pubmed: 29016841
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 25;60(13):1163-70
pubmed: 22958958
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2346-2355
pubmed: 29803589
Circulation. 2017 May 9;135(19):1788-1798
pubmed: 28228428
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Aug;8(8):593-8
pubmed: 25151320
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2235-45
pubmed: 27042964
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1903-9
pubmed: 21093036
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 27;49(12):1340-8
pubmed: 17394967
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1249-56
pubmed: 25066536