Association of High-Density Calcified 1K Plaque With Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Journal
JAMA cardiology
ISSN: 2380-6591
Titre abrégé: JAMA Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676033
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2020
01 03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
23
1
2020
medline:
12
1
2021
entrez:
23
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Plaque morphologic measures on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) have been associated with future acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the evolution of calcified coronary plaques by noninvasive imaging is not known. To ascertain whether the increasing density in calcified coronary plaque is associated with risk for ACS. This multicenter case-control cohort study included individuals enrolled in ICONIC (Incident Coronary Syndromes Identified by Computed Tomography), a nested case-control study of patients drawn from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry, which included 13 study sites in 8 countries. Patients who experienced core laboratory-verified ACS after baseline CCTA (n = 189) and control individuals who did not experience ACS after baseline CCTA (n = 189) were included. Patients and controls were matched 1:1 by propensity scores for age; male sex; presence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes; family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD); current smoking status; and CAD severity. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to March 2019. Whole-heart atherosclerotic plaque volume was quantitated from all coronary vessels and their branches. For patients who underwent invasive angiography at the time of ACS, culprit lesions were coregistered to baseline CCTA lesions by a blinded independent reader. Low-density plaque was defined as having less than 130 Hounsfield units (HU); calcified plaque, as having more than 350 HU and subcategorized on a voxel-level basis into 3 strata: 351 to 700 HU, 701 to 1000 HU, and more than 1000 HU (termed 1K plaque). Association between calcium density and future ACS risk. A total of 189 patients and 189 matched controls (mean [SD] age of 59.9 [9.8] years; 247 [65.3%] were male) were included in the analysis and were monitored during a mean (SD) follow-up period of 3.9 (2.5) years. The overall mean (SD) calcified plaque volume (>350 HU) was similar between patients and controls (76.4 [101.6] mm3 vs 99.0 [156.1] mm3; P = .32), but patients who experienced ACS exhibited less 1K plaque (>1000 HU) compared with controls (3.9 [8.3] mm3 vs 9.4 [23.2] mm3; P = .02). Individuals within the highest quartile of 1K plaque exhibited less low-density plaque, as a percentage of total plaque, when compared with patients within the lower 3 quartiles (12.6% [10.4%] vs 24.9% [20.6%]; P < .001). For 93 culprit precursor lesions detected by CCTA, the volume of 1K plaque was lower compared with the maximally stenotic lesion in controls (2.6 [7.2] mm3 vs 7.6 [20.3] mm3; P = .01). The per-patient and per-lesion results were similar between the 2 groups when restricted to myocardial infarction cases. Results of this study suggest that, on a per-patient and per-lesion basis, 1K plaque was associated with a lower risk for future ACS and that measurement of 1K plaque may improve risk stratification beyond plaque burden.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31968065
pii: 2759254
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5315
pmc: PMC6990946
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
282-290Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Circulation. 2004 Nov 30;110(22):3424-9
pubmed: 15557374
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1475-1484
pubmed: 29909109
JAMA. 2014 Jan 15;311(3):271-8
pubmed: 24247483
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000 May;20(5):1262-75
pubmed: 10807742
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan;11(1):127-142
pubmed: 29301708
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 18;50(12):1161-70
pubmed: 17868808
Circulation. 1995 Oct 15;92(8):2157-62
pubmed: 7554196
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep;9(9):1099-1113
pubmed: 27609151
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Apr;26(4):373-83
pubmed: 20052618
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 15;91(6):714-8
pubmed: 12633805
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 1;39(25):2401-2408
pubmed: 29688297
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jun 5;71(22):2511-2522
pubmed: 29852975
Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):483-8
pubmed: 12563143
Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2466-74
pubmed: 18491107
Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):3073-83
pubmed: 25994190
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Jul-Aug;28(4):449-54
pubmed: 15232374
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 28;66(4):337-46
pubmed: 26205589
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Mar-Apr;5(2):84-92
pubmed: 21477786
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 7;65(13):1273-1282
pubmed: 25835438
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2551-67
pubmed: 22922414
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2935-2959
pubmed: 24239921
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;40(1):139-46
pubmed: 20926369
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec;10(6):435-449
pubmed: 27780758
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Sep 1;108(5):658-64
pubmed: 21684509
Circulation. 2000 Feb 15;101(6):598-603
pubmed: 10673250