Large pelvic mass arising from the cervical stump: A case report.
Case report
Cervical cyst
High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion
Large pelvic mass
Supracervical hysterectomy
Total hysterectomy
Journal
World journal of clinical cases
ISSN: 2307-8960
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Cases
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2020
06 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
13
10
2019
revised:
17
11
2019
accepted:
06
12
2019
entrez:
24
1
2020
pubmed:
24
1
2020
medline:
24
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A large cervical cyst with a cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion arising from the cervical stump is rare. After supracervical hysterectomy, there is a risk of various lesions occurring in the cervical stump. We review the types and characteristics of cervical stump lesions and compare total hysterectomy with subtotal hysterectomy. Gynecologists should choose the most suitable surgical method based on both the patient's condition and wishes. If the cervix is retained, patients require a close follow-up. A 57-year-old woman was admitted to the Gynecology Department for a large pelvic mass. Her chief complaint was abdominal distention for two months. She had undergone subtotal supracervical hysterectomy for leiomyoma 14 years prior. Abdominal ultrasonography detected a 9.1 cm × 8.5 cm × 8.4 cm anechoic mass with silvery fluid in the pelvic cavity and high-risk human papilloma virus 53 (HPV53) was positive. The admission diagnosis we first considered was a pelvic mass mimicking carcinoma of the cervical stump. We performed a laparotomy and a rapid frozen biopsy was suggestive of a fibrous cyst wall coated with a high squamous intraepithelial lesion. The pelvic mass was removed, and a bilateral adnexectomy was implemented. Final pathology confirmed that the pelvic mass was a large inflammatory cyst with a cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. After successful intervention, the patient was discharged one week after surgery and there was no recurrence of the vaginal stump at 43 mo. When addressing benign uterine diseases, gynecologists should pay adequate attention to retaining the cervix. If the cervix is retained, patients require a close follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A large cervical cyst with a cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion arising from the cervical stump is rare. After supracervical hysterectomy, there is a risk of various lesions occurring in the cervical stump. We review the types and characteristics of cervical stump lesions and compare total hysterectomy with subtotal hysterectomy. Gynecologists should choose the most suitable surgical method based on both the patient's condition and wishes. If the cervix is retained, patients require a close follow-up.
CASE SUMMARY
METHODS
A 57-year-old woman was admitted to the Gynecology Department for a large pelvic mass. Her chief complaint was abdominal distention for two months. She had undergone subtotal supracervical hysterectomy for leiomyoma 14 years prior. Abdominal ultrasonography detected a 9.1 cm × 8.5 cm × 8.4 cm anechoic mass with silvery fluid in the pelvic cavity and high-risk human papilloma virus 53 (HPV53) was positive. The admission diagnosis we first considered was a pelvic mass mimicking carcinoma of the cervical stump. We performed a laparotomy and a rapid frozen biopsy was suggestive of a fibrous cyst wall coated with a high squamous intraepithelial lesion. The pelvic mass was removed, and a bilateral adnexectomy was implemented. Final pathology confirmed that the pelvic mass was a large inflammatory cyst with a cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. After successful intervention, the patient was discharged one week after surgery and there was no recurrence of the vaginal stump at 43 mo.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
When addressing benign uterine diseases, gynecologists should pay adequate attention to retaining the cervix. If the cervix is retained, patients require a close follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31970181
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.149
pmc: PMC6962062
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
149-156Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Dec;48(6):711-5
pubmed: 995341
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):299-306
pubmed: 27640066
East Mediterr Health J. 2010 Feb;16(2):176-9
pubmed: 20799571
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:40-5
pubmed: 26231437
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991 Dec;51(12):996-1003
pubmed: 1838998
Radiother Oncol. 1997 May;43(2):147-53
pubmed: 9192959
Gynecol Oncol. 1992 Aug;46(2):199-202
pubmed: 1500023
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:169-177
pubmed: 28779691
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Apr;25(2):153-6
pubmed: 21074497
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;296(3):513-518
pubmed: 28685227
Gynecol Surg. 2015;12(2):89-93
pubmed: 25960707
BJOG. 2001 Oct;108(10):1017-20
pubmed: 11702830
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):337-344
pubmed: 29948170
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1992 Apr;71(3):230-4
pubmed: 1317649
Clin Ther. 2019 Apr;41(4):768-789
pubmed: 30910330
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1215-7
pubmed: 17978148
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015 May;58(3):239-45
pubmed: 26023674
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(2):133-44
pubmed: 17364274
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 27;348(9):856-7; author reply 856-7
pubmed: 12606743
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2010 Sep;22(3):185-90
pubmed: 21863069
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;295(2):397-405
pubmed: 27848016
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):650.e1-4
pubmed: 18060966
Chemosphere. 2006 Jan;62(1):163-70
pubmed: 16325652
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2016;37(1):148-51
pubmed: 27048131
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;89(1):133-9
pubmed: 8990455