Validating clinical threshold values for a dashboard view of the compensatory reserve measurement for hemorrhage detection.
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
1
2020
medline:
5
1
2021
entrez:
24
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Compensatory reserve measurement (CRM) is a novel noninvasive monitoring technology designed to assess physiologic reserve using feature interrogation of arterial pulse waveforms. This study was conducted to validate clinically relevant CRM values with a simplified color-coded dashboard view. We performed a prospective observational study of 300 injured patients admitted to a level I trauma center. Compensatory reserve measurement was recorded upon emergency department admission. Data collected to complement the analysis included patient demographics, vital signs, lifesaving interventions, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and outcomes. Threshold values of CRM were analyzed for predictive capability of hemorrhage. A total of 285 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age of the population was 47 years, and 67% were male. Hemorrhage was present in 32 (11%), and lifesaving intervention was performed in 40 (14%) patients. Transfusion of packed red blood cells was administered in 33 (11.6%) patients, and 21 (7.4%) were taken to the operating room for surgical or endovascular control of hemorrhage. Statistical analyses were performed to identify optimal threshold values for three zones of CRM to predict hemorrhage. Optimal levels for red, yellow, and green areas of the dashboard view were stratified as follows: red if CRM was less than 30%, yellow if CRM was 30% to 59%, and green if CRM was 60% or greater. Odds of hemorrhage increased by 12-fold (odds ratio, 12.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-38.9) with CRM less than 30% (red) and 6.5-fold (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-15.9) with CRM of equal to 30% to 59% (yellow) when compared with patients with CRM of 60% or greater. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for three-zone CRM was similar to that of continuous CRM (0.77 vs. 0.79) but further increased the ability to predict hemorrhage after adjusting for ISS (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.87). A three-zone CRM could be a potentially useful predictor of hemorrhage in trauma patients with added capabilities of continuous monitoring and a real-time ISS assessment. These data substantiate easily interpretable threshold dashboard values for triage with potential to improve injury outcomes. Diagnostic, level II.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Compensatory reserve measurement (CRM) is a novel noninvasive monitoring technology designed to assess physiologic reserve using feature interrogation of arterial pulse waveforms. This study was conducted to validate clinically relevant CRM values with a simplified color-coded dashboard view.
METHODS
We performed a prospective observational study of 300 injured patients admitted to a level I trauma center. Compensatory reserve measurement was recorded upon emergency department admission. Data collected to complement the analysis included patient demographics, vital signs, lifesaving interventions, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and outcomes. Threshold values of CRM were analyzed for predictive capability of hemorrhage.
RESULTS
A total of 285 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age of the population was 47 years, and 67% were male. Hemorrhage was present in 32 (11%), and lifesaving intervention was performed in 40 (14%) patients. Transfusion of packed red blood cells was administered in 33 (11.6%) patients, and 21 (7.4%) were taken to the operating room for surgical or endovascular control of hemorrhage. Statistical analyses were performed to identify optimal threshold values for three zones of CRM to predict hemorrhage. Optimal levels for red, yellow, and green areas of the dashboard view were stratified as follows: red if CRM was less than 30%, yellow if CRM was 30% to 59%, and green if CRM was 60% or greater. Odds of hemorrhage increased by 12-fold (odds ratio, 12.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-38.9) with CRM less than 30% (red) and 6.5-fold (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-15.9) with CRM of equal to 30% to 59% (yellow) when compared with patients with CRM of 60% or greater. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for three-zone CRM was similar to that of continuous CRM (0.77 vs. 0.79) but further increased the ability to predict hemorrhage after adjusting for ISS (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.87).
CONCLUSION
A three-zone CRM could be a potentially useful predictor of hemorrhage in trauma patients with added capabilities of continuous monitoring and a real-time ISS assessment. These data substantiate easily interpretable threshold dashboard values for triage with potential to improve injury outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Diagnostic, level II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31972755
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002586
pii: 01586154-202008002-00025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S169-S174Références
Eastridge BJ, Hardin M, Cantrell J, et al. Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation and implications for improving combat casualty care. J Trauma. 2011;71(Suppl 1):S4–S8.
Convertino VA, Moulton SL, Grudic GZ, Rickards CA, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Ryan KL. Use of advanced machine-learning techniques for non-invasive monitoring of hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2011;71:S25–S32.
Eastridge BJ, Salinas J, McManus JG, Blackburn L, Bugler EM, Cooke WH, Convertino VA, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Hypotension begins at 110 mm Hg: redefining “hypotension” with data. J Trauma. 2007;63(2):291–297; discussion 297-9.
Convertino VA, Schiller AM. Measuring the compensatory reserve to identify shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6S Suppl 1):S57–S65.
Convertino VA, Howard JT, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Cardin S, Batchelder P, Mulligan J, Grudic GZ, Moulton SL, MacLeod DB. Individual-specific, beat-to-beat trending of significant human blood loss: the compensatory reserve. Shock. 2015;(44 Suppl 1):27–32.
Convertino VA, Wirt MD, Glenn JF, Lein BC. The compensatory reserve for early and accurate prediction of hemodynamic compromise: a review of the underlying physiology. Shock. 2016;45(6):580–590.
Eastridge BJ, Salinas J, Wade CE, Blackbourne LH. Hypotension is 100 mm hg on the battlefield. Am J Surg. 2011;202(4):404–408.
Suresh MR, Chung KK, Schiller AM, Holley AB, Howard JT, Convertino VA. Unmasking the hypovolemic shock continuum: the compensatory reserve. J Intensive Care Med. 2019;34(9):696–706.
Convertino VA, Grudic GZ, Mulligan J, Moulton SL. Estimation of individual-specific progression to impending cardiovascular instability using arterial waveforms. J Appl Physiol. 2013;115(8):1196–1202.
Falzone E, Pasquier P, Hoffmann C, Barbier O, Boutonnet M, Salvadori A, Jarrassier A, Renner J, Malgras B, Merat S. Triage in military settings. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(1):43–51.
Kotwal RS, Butler FK, Montgomery HR, Brunstetter TJ, Diaz GY, Kirkpatrick JW, Summers NL, Shackelford SA, Holcomb JB, Bailey JA. The tactical combat casualty care casualty card TCCC guidelines — proposed change 1301. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;13(2):82–87.
Koons NJ, Nguyen B, Suresh MR, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Convertino VA. Tracking DO2 with compensatory reserve during whole blood resuscitation following controlled hemorrhage in baboons. Shock. 2020. ePub ahead of print.
Moulton S, Mulligan J, Grudic G, Convertino V. Running on empty? The compensatory reserve index. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:1053–1059.
Koons NJ, Owens GA, Parsons DL, Schauer SG, Buller JL, Convertino VA. Compensatory reserve: a novel monitoring capability for early detection of hemorrhage by combat medics. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020.
Howard JT, Janak JC, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Convertino VA. Specificity of compensatory reserve and tissue oxygenation as early predictors of tolerance to progressive reductions in central blood volume. Shock. 2016;46(3 Suppl 1):68–73.
Cioffi J, Salter C, Wilkes L, Vonu-Boriceanu O, Scott J. Clinicians' responses to abnormal vital signs in an emergency department. Aust Crit Care. 2006;19(2):66–72.
Gerhardt RT, Berry JA, Blackbourne LH. Analysis of life-saving interventions performed by out-of-hospital combat medical personnel. J Trauma. 2011;71(Suppl 1):S109–S113.
Stewart CL, Nawn CD, Mulligan J, Grudic G, Moulton SL, Convertino VA. Compensatory reserve for early and accurate prediction of hemodynamic compromise: case studies for clinical utility in acute care and physical performance. J Spec Oper Med. 2016;16(1):6–13.
Nadler R, Convertino VA, Gendler S, Lending G, Lipsky AM, Cardin S, Lowenthal A, Glassberg E. The value of noninvasive measurement of the compensatory reserve index in monitoring and triage of patients experiencing minimal blood loss. Shock. 2014;42(2):93–98.
Stewart C, Mulligan J, Grudic G, Convertino V, Moulton S. Detection of low-volume blood loss: the compensatory reserve index versus traditional vital signs. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(6):892–897.
Stewart CL, Mulligan J, Grudic GZ, Talley ME, Jurkovich GJ, Moulton SL. The compensatory reserve index following injury: results of a prospective clinical trial. Shock. 2016;46(3 Suppl 1):61–67.
Convertino VA, Koons NJ. The compensatory reserve: potential for accurate individualized goal-directed whole blood resuscitation. Transfusion. 2020. ePub ahead of print.
Schiller AM, Howard JT, Convertino VA. The physiology of blood loss and shock: new insights from a human laboratory model of hemorrhage. Exp Biol Med. 2017;242(8):874–883.
Curry N, Hopewell S, Doree C, Hyde C, Brohi K, Stanworth S. The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: a systemic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2011;15:R92.
Janak JC, Howard JT, Goei KA, Weber R, Muniz GW, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Convertino VA. Predictors of the onset of hemodynamic decompensation during progressive central hypovolemia: comparison of the peripheral perfusion index, pulse pressure variability, and compensatory reserve index. Shock. 2015;44(6):548–553.
Schiller AM, Howard JT, Lye KR, Magby CG, Convertino VA. Comparisons of traditional metabolic markers and compensatory reserve as early predictors of tolerance to central hypovolemia in humans. Shock. 2018;50(1):71–77.
Schlotman TE, Lehnhardt KR, Abercromby AF, Easter BD, Downs ME, Akers LTCKS, Convertino VA. Bridging the gap between military prolonged field care monitoring and exploration spaceflight: the compensatory reserve. NPJ Microgravity. 2019;5:29.
Benov A, Yaslowitz O, Hakim T, Amir-Keret R, Nadler R, Brand A, Glassberg E, Yitzhak A, Convertino VA, Paran H. The effect of blood transfusion on compensatory reserve: a prospective clinical trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1 Suppl 1):S71–S76.
Johnson MC, Alarhayem A, Convertino VA, et al. Comparison of compensatory reserve and arterial lactate as markers of shock and resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83:603–608.
Johnson MC, Alarhayem A, Convertino V, et al. Compensatory Reserve Index: performance of a novel monitoring technology to identify bleeding trauma patients. Shock. 2018;49:295–300.