Development of the Nursing Quality Improvement in Practice Tool: Advancing Frontline Nursing Practice.


Journal

Journal of nursing care quality
ISSN: 1550-5065
Titre abrégé: J Nurs Care Qual
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200672

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 24 1 2020
medline: 29 4 2021
entrez: 24 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Frontline nurse engagement in quality improvement (QI) improves nurse-sensitive outcomes; yet research suggests frontline nurses are not engaging in QI. The purpose of this study was to develop, refine, and psychometrically evaluate the Nursing Quality Improvement in Practice (N-QuIP) tool to measure nurses' competency, engagement, and barriers/facilitators to QI engagement. Item development was guided by an expert panel and literature review. Factor analysis and reliability indices were assessed through 681 surveys completed by nurses at one medical center. Cronbach α coefficients were 0.97 (Skill Scale) and 0.90 (Attitude Scale). Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) for knowledge was 0.36. Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 (Skill) and 3 (Attitude) subscales respectively, aligning well with QI competencies. Preliminary data suggest that the N-QuIP is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nurse QI competence and engagement. Understanding current knowledge, skills, and attitudes and identified barriers/facilitators can help the development of strategies aimed at increasing QI engagement.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Frontline nurse engagement in quality improvement (QI) improves nurse-sensitive outcomes; yet research suggests frontline nurses are not engaging in QI.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to develop, refine, and psychometrically evaluate the Nursing Quality Improvement in Practice (N-QuIP) tool to measure nurses' competency, engagement, and barriers/facilitators to QI engagement.
METHODS METHODS
Item development was guided by an expert panel and literature review. Factor analysis and reliability indices were assessed through 681 surveys completed by nurses at one medical center.
RESULTS RESULTS
Cronbach α coefficients were 0.97 (Skill Scale) and 0.90 (Attitude Scale). Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) for knowledge was 0.36. Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 (Skill) and 3 (Attitude) subscales respectively, aligning well with QI competencies.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary data suggest that the N-QuIP is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nurse QI competence and engagement. Understanding current knowledge, skills, and attitudes and identified barriers/facilitators can help the development of strategies aimed at increasing QI engagement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31972780
doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000457
pii: 00001786-202010000-00015
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

372-379

Références

Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS; for Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2000. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225182/. Accessed October 7, 2019.
Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139.
Pearson ML, Needleman J, Beckman R, Han B. Facilitating nurses' engagement in hospital quality improvement: The New Jersey Hospital Association's implementation of Transforming Care at the Bedside. J Healthc Qual. 2016;38(6):e64–e75.
Lavoie-Tremblay M, O'Connor P, Lavigne GL, et al. Transforming Care at the Bedside: managers' and health care providers' perceptions of their change capacities. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2014;45(11):514–520.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209880/. Accessed October 7, 2019.
Quality Driven Healthcare. White Paper. NAHQ Summit. https://www.qualitydrivenhealthcare.org/white-paper. Accessed October 7, 2019.
Naylor MD, Volpe EM, Lustig A, Kelley HJ, Melichar L, Pauly MV. Linkages between nursing and the quality of patient care: a 2-year comparison. Med Care. 2013;51:S6–S14.
Djukic M, Kovner CT, Brewer CS, Fatehi FK. Early-career registered nursesʼ participation in hospital quality improvement activities. J Nurs Care Qual. 2013;28(3):198–207.
Kovner CT, Brewer CS, Yingrengreung S, Fairchild S. New nurses' views of quality improvement education. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(1):29–35.
Cronenwett L, Sherwood G, Barnsteiner J, Disch J. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nurs Outlook. 2007;55(3):122–131.
Cronenwett L, Sherwood G, Pohl J, Barnsteiner J. Quality and safety education for advanced nursing practice. Nurs Outlook. 2009;57(6):338–348.
Dunagan PB. The quality improvement attitude survey: Development and preliminary psychometric characteristics. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23/24):5113–5120.
Audet A-MJ, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum SC. Measure, learn, and improve: physicians' involvement in quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(3):843.
McGaffigan PA, Ullem BD, Gandhi TK. Closing the gap and raising the bar: assessing board competency in quality and safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017;43(6):267–274.
Joly BM, Booth M, Mittal P, Shaler G. Measuring quality improvement in public health. Eval Health Prof. 2012;35(2):119–147.
Krulish LH. OBQI staff competency tools. Home Healthc Nurse. 2002;20(9):608.
Becker H, Meraviglia M, Seo JE, Ndlovu C, Kimmel L, Rowin T. The appraisal of nursing practice: instrument development and initial testing. J Nurs Adm. 2018;48(1):44–49.
Dycus P, McKeon L. Using QSEN to measure quality and safety knowledge, skills, and attitudes of experienced pediatric oncology nurses: an international study. Qual Manag Health Care. 2009;18(3):202.
Tovar E, Ossege J, Farus-Brown S, Zonsius M, Morrow L. DNP program faculty and graduatesʼ knowledge and use of QI and safety processes. Nurse Educ. 2020;45(1):11–16.
Ridenour J. Measuring competencies: development of the administrator competency survey. Sem Nurs Manag. 1996;4(2):98–106.
QSEN Institute. Task Forces. http://qsen.org/about-qsen/task-forces/. Accessed October 7, 2019.
McGahee TW, Ball J. How to read and really use an item analysis. Nurse Educ. 2009;34(4):166–171.
Watling T. Factors enabling and inhibiting facilitator development: lessons learned from Essentials of Care in South Eastern Sydney Local Health District. Int Pract Dev J. 2015;5(2).
Mello M, Cummings J. Are nurses engaged in quality initiatives? Nurs Times. 2011;107(37):18–20.
Draper DA, Felland LE, Liebhaber A, Melichar L. The role of nurses in hospital quality improvement. Nephrol Nurs J. 2008;35(4):431.

Auteurs

Dana Tschannen (D)

School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Tschannen); Department of Community & Family Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Dr Alexander); College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Tovar); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Ms Ghosh); The Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare, Columbus, Ohio, and The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus (Dr Zellefrow); and Davis & Henley College of Nursing, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut (Dr Milner).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH