A rapid quality control test to foster the development of the sterile insect technique against Anopheles arabiensis.
Flight ability
Malaria
Quality control (QC)
Sterile insect technique (SIT)
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jan 2020
23 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
04
07
2019
accepted:
16
01
2020
entrez:
25
1
2020
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
16
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the fight against malaria reportedly stalling there is an urgent demand for alternative and sustainable control measures. As the sterile insect technique (SIT) edges closer to becoming a viable complementary tool in mosquito control, it will be necessary to find standardized techniques of assessing male quality throughout the production system and post-irradiation handling. Flight ability is known to be a direct marker of insect quality. A new version of the reference International Atomic Energy Agency/Food and Agricultural Organization (IAEA/FAO) flight test device (FTD), modified to measure the flight ability and in turn quality of male Anopheles arabiensis within a 2-h period via a series of verification experiments is presented. Anopheles arabiensis juveniles were mass reared in a rack and tray system. 7500 male pupae were sexed under a stereomicroscope (2500 per treatment). Stress treatments included irradiation (with 50, 90, 120 or 160 Gy, using a Gammacell 220), chilling (at 0, 4, 8 and 10 °C) and compaction weight (5, 15, 25, and 50 g). Controls did not undergo any stress treatment. Three days post-emergence, adult males were subjected to either chilling or compaction (or were previously irradiated at pupal stage), after which two repeats (100 males) from each treatment and control group were placed in a FTD to measure flight ability. Additionally, one male was caged with 10 virgin females for 4 days to assess mating capacity (five repeats). Survival was monitored daily for a period of 15 days on remaining adults (two repeats). Flight ability results accurately predicted male quality following irradiation, with the first significant difference occurring at an irradiation dose of 90 Gy, a result which was reflected in both survival and insemination rates. A weight of 5 g or more significantly reduced flight ability and insemination rate, with survival appearing less sensitive and not significantly impacted until a weight of 15 g was imposed. Flight ability was significantly reduced after treatments at 4 °C with the insemination rate more sensitive to chilling with survival again less sensitive (8 and 0 °C, respectively). The reported results conclude that the output of a short flight ability test, adapted from the previously tested Aedes FTD, is an accurate indicator of male mosquito quality and could be a useful tool for the development of the SIT against An. arabiensis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With the fight against malaria reportedly stalling there is an urgent demand for alternative and sustainable control measures. As the sterile insect technique (SIT) edges closer to becoming a viable complementary tool in mosquito control, it will be necessary to find standardized techniques of assessing male quality throughout the production system and post-irradiation handling. Flight ability is known to be a direct marker of insect quality. A new version of the reference International Atomic Energy Agency/Food and Agricultural Organization (IAEA/FAO) flight test device (FTD), modified to measure the flight ability and in turn quality of male Anopheles arabiensis within a 2-h period via a series of verification experiments is presented.
METHODS
METHODS
Anopheles arabiensis juveniles were mass reared in a rack and tray system. 7500 male pupae were sexed under a stereomicroscope (2500 per treatment). Stress treatments included irradiation (with 50, 90, 120 or 160 Gy, using a Gammacell 220), chilling (at 0, 4, 8 and 10 °C) and compaction weight (5, 15, 25, and 50 g). Controls did not undergo any stress treatment. Three days post-emergence, adult males were subjected to either chilling or compaction (or were previously irradiated at pupal stage), after which two repeats (100 males) from each treatment and control group were placed in a FTD to measure flight ability. Additionally, one male was caged with 10 virgin females for 4 days to assess mating capacity (five repeats). Survival was monitored daily for a period of 15 days on remaining adults (two repeats).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Flight ability results accurately predicted male quality following irradiation, with the first significant difference occurring at an irradiation dose of 90 Gy, a result which was reflected in both survival and insemination rates. A weight of 5 g or more significantly reduced flight ability and insemination rate, with survival appearing less sensitive and not significantly impacted until a weight of 15 g was imposed. Flight ability was significantly reduced after treatments at 4 °C with the insemination rate more sensitive to chilling with survival again less sensitive (8 and 0 °C, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The reported results conclude that the output of a short flight ability test, adapted from the previously tested Aedes FTD, is an accurate indicator of male mosquito quality and could be a useful tool for the development of the SIT against An. arabiensis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31973756
doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3125-z
pii: 10.1186/s12936-020-3125-z
pmc: PMC6979282
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44Subventions
Organisme : International Atomic Energy Agency
ID : Regular Budget
Organisme : University of Liverpool
ID : Bursary Scheme to cover tuition fees
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0205966
pubmed: 30403762
J Med Entomol. 2012 Sep;49(5):1001-11
pubmed: 23025180
Methods Ecol Evol. 2014 Sep;5(9):944-946
pubmed: 25810896
Malar J. 2016 Feb 06;15:72
pubmed: 26852018
J Med Entomol. 2012 May;49(3):595-605
pubmed: 22679867
J Med Entomol. 2014 Jan;51(1):155-63
pubmed: 24605465
Malar J. 2017 Sep 7;16(1):357
pubmed: 28882146
J Econ Entomol. 2000 Feb;93(1):123-35
pubmed: 14658522
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Sep 11;11(9):e0005881
pubmed: 28892483
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Nov 21;11(1):603
pubmed: 30463624
J Insect Sci. 2018 Nov 1;18(6):null
pubmed: 30383264
J Med Entomol. 2008 Jul;45(4):698-705
pubmed: 18714870
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 1;8(1):16179
pubmed: 30385841
Malar J. 2009 Nov 16;8 Suppl 2:S2
pubmed: 19917072
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Nov 12;9(11):e0004229
pubmed: 26562521
Biometrics. 1995 Sep;51(3):1077-84
pubmed: 7548692