Electrophysiological indicators of gesture perception.
Adolescent
Adult
Attention
/ physiology
Brain Waves
/ physiology
Electroencephalography
/ methods
Electrophysiological Phenomena
/ physiology
Female
Gestures
Humans
Male
Mirror Neurons
/ physiology
Motor Cortex
/ physiology
Psychomotor Performance
/ physiology
Visual Perception
/ physiology
Young Adult
EEG
Gesture processing
Mirror neuron
Mu
Journal
Experimental brain research
ISSN: 1432-1106
Titre abrégé: Exp Brain Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0043312
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
07
03
2019
accepted:
03
01
2020
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
26
11
2020
entrez:
25
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Electroencephalography (EEG) activity in the mu frequency band (8-13 Hz) is suppressed during both gesture performance and observation. However, it is not clear if or how particular characteristics within the kinematic execution of gestures map onto dynamic changes in mu activity. Mapping the time course of gesture kinematics onto that of mu activity could help understand which aspects of gestures capture attention and aid in the classification of communicative intent. In this work, we test whether the timing of inflection points within gesture kinematics predicts the occurrence of oscillatory mu activity during passive gesture observation. The timing for salient features of performed gestures in video stimuli was determined by isolating inflection points in the hands' motion trajectories. Participants passively viewed the gesture videos while continuous EEG data was collected. We used wavelet analysis to extract mu oscillations at 11 Hz and at central electrodes and occipital electrodes. We used linear regression to test for associations between the timing of inflection points in motion trajectories and mu oscillations that generalized across gesture stimuli. Separately, we also tested whether inflection point occurrences evoked mu/alpha responses that generalized across participants. Across all gestures and inflection points, and pooled across participants, peaks in 11 Hz EEG waveforms were detected 465 and 535 ms after inflection points at occipital and central electrodes, respectively. A regression model showed that inflection points in the motion trajectories strongly predicted subsequent mu oscillations ([Formula: see text]<0.01); effects were weaker and non-significant for low (17 Hz) and high (21 Hz) beta activity. When segmented by inflection point occurrence rather than stimulus onset and testing participants as a random effect, inflection points evoked mu and beta activity from 308 to 364 ms at central electrodes, and broad activity from 226 to 800 ms at occipital electrodes. The results suggest that inflection points in gesture trajectories elicit coordinated activity in the visual and motor cortices, with prominent activity in the mu/alpha frequency band and extending into the beta frequency band. The time course of activity indicates that visual processing drives subsequent activity in the motor cortex during gesture processing, with a lag of approximately 80 ms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31974755
doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05724-y
pii: 10.1007/s00221-020-05724-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
537-550Subventions
Organisme : Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
ID : W81XWH-14-1-0042
Références
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jul;8(7):955-60
pubmed: 15937484
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Aug;25(8):2076-82
pubmed: 24532320
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;95(2):709-29
pubmed: 16251265
Front Neurorobot. 2013 Nov 13;7:19
pubmed: 24348375
J Physiol. 2006 Nov 15;577(Pt 1):417-32
pubmed: 16973712
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jun;61(6):905-19
pubmed: 18470821
Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1315-28
pubmed: 17689268
Curr Biol. 2002 Oct 29;12(21):R736-7
pubmed: 12419204
Cortex. 2016 Sep;82:290-310
pubmed: 27180217
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Jul;89(1):99-105
pubmed: 23756148
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Sep;46(11):2851-4
pubmed: 18554670
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Apr;11(4):264-74
pubmed: 20216547
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(3):363-73
pubmed: 20680250
Exp Brain Res. 1992;91(1):176-80
pubmed: 1301372
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Dec;25(3):668-77
pubmed: 16236487
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:879716
pubmed: 21584256
Int J Psychophysiol. 1994 May;16(2-3):147-53
pubmed: 8089033
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Mar;3(2):131-41
pubmed: 8713554
Curr Biol. 2008 Oct 28;18(20):1576-80
pubmed: 18948009
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1513-21
pubmed: 18289617
Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1674-84
pubmed: 17395490
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jun;19(6):1239-55
pubmed: 19020203
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Oct;50(12):2745-2751
pubmed: 22910276
Psychophysiology. 2005 Nov;42(6):654-67
pubmed: 16364061
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Dec;122:6-16
pubmed: 27756546
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-92
pubmed: 15217330
Front Neurosci. 2019 Feb 08;13:76
pubmed: 30804744
Neuroimage. 2011 Oct 1;58(3):895-904
pubmed: 21742042
Neuroscience. 1982 Feb;7(2):431-7
pubmed: 7078732
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Apr;19(2):195-201
pubmed: 15019715
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Apr;37(2):177-92
pubmed: 24775147
Trends Neurosci. 1998 May;21(5):188-94
pubmed: 9610880
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):2033-42
pubmed: 18339409
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Jun;63(6):1280-91
pubmed: 26513773
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 May;3(5):172-178
pubmed: 10322473
Science. 1999 Dec 24;286(5449):2526-8
pubmed: 10617472