Folic Acid Modulates Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Expression Following Spinal Cord Injury.
Demethylation
Folic acid (FA)
MMP-2
MMP-9
Matrix metalloproteinses (MMPs)
Journal
Annals of neurosciences
ISSN: 0972-7531
Titre abrégé: Ann Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101523367
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
revised:
12
07
2019
accepted:
13
07
2019
entrez:
25
1
2020
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
25
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) induced neuropathic pain (NP) proves to be extremely clinically challenging as the mechanism behind SCINP is poorly understood. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) is largely responsible for the early disruption of the blood spinal cord barrier. This system initiates macrophage infiltration and degradation of myelin, which plays a pivotal role in how NP occurs. In a recent study, we demonstrated that folic acid (FA) treatment to cSCI rats reduced NP and improved functional recovery by repressing MMP-2 expression. We hypothesize that MMP-2 expression is suppressed because FA actively methylates the DNA sequence that encodes for the MMP-2 protein. However, modulation of MMP-2 expression for alleviation of NP is only pertinent to the mid- to late-phase of injury. Therefore, we need to explore alternate therapeutic methods to target the early- to mid-phase of injury to wholly alleviate NP. Furthering our previous findings on inhibiting MMP-2 expression by FA in mid- and late- phase following cSCI in rats, we hypothesized that FA will methylate and suppress MMP-9 expression during the early- phase, day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI and mid- phase (day 18 post cSCI), in comparison with MMP-2 expression during mid- and the late-phase of cSCI. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (250-270g) underwent cSCI, using a NYU impactor, with 12.5 gm/cm injury. The spinal cord-injured animals were treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with a standardized dose of FA (80 μg/kg body weight) on day 1, 2, 3, prior to cSCI, followed by daily injection up to 14 or 17 days post-cSCI in different experiments. Animals were euthanized on day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI (early- phase), day 18 post cSCI (mid- phase), and day 42 post cSCI (late-phase) and the epicenter region of injured spinal cord were harvested for MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression analysis by Western blots technique. i) During early-phase on day 1, 3, and 7, the quantitation displayed no statistical significance in MMP-9 expression, between water- and FA- injected rats. ii) On day 18 post-cSCI, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-9 (p = 0.043) iii) Comparing results with MMP-2 expression and inhibition, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-2 on day 18 post cSCI (FA- and water-injected rats (p = 0.003). iv) In addition, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-2 on day 42 post-cSCI comparing FA- and water- injected rat groups (p = 0.034). We report that FA administration results in alleviating cSCI-induced NP by inhibiting MMP-9 in the proposed mid- phase of cSCI. However, FA administration resulted in MMP-2 decline during both mid- through late- phase following cSCI. Our study elucidates a new phase of cSCI, the mid-phase. We conclude that further investigation on discovering and quantifying the nature of the mid- phase of SCI injury is needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) induced neuropathic pain (NP) proves to be extremely clinically challenging as the mechanism behind SCINP is poorly understood. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) is largely responsible for the early disruption of the blood spinal cord barrier. This system initiates macrophage infiltration and degradation of myelin, which plays a pivotal role in how NP occurs. In a recent study, we demonstrated that folic acid (FA) treatment to cSCI rats reduced NP and improved functional recovery by repressing MMP-2 expression. We hypothesize that MMP-2 expression is suppressed because FA actively methylates the DNA sequence that encodes for the MMP-2 protein. However, modulation of MMP-2 expression for alleviation of NP is only pertinent to the mid- to late-phase of injury. Therefore, we need to explore alternate therapeutic methods to target the early- to mid-phase of injury to wholly alleviate NP.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
Furthering our previous findings on inhibiting MMP-2 expression by FA in mid- and late- phase following cSCI in rats, we hypothesized that FA will methylate and suppress MMP-9 expression during the early- phase, day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI and mid- phase (day 18 post cSCI), in comparison with MMP-2 expression during mid- and the late-phase of cSCI.
METHODS
METHODS
Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (250-270g) underwent cSCI, using a NYU impactor, with 12.5 gm/cm injury. The spinal cord-injured animals were treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with a standardized dose of FA (80 μg/kg body weight) on day 1, 2, 3, prior to cSCI, followed by daily injection up to 14 or 17 days post-cSCI in different experiments. Animals were euthanized on day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI (early- phase), day 18 post cSCI (mid- phase), and day 42 post cSCI (late-phase) and the epicenter region of injured spinal cord were harvested for MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression analysis by Western blots technique.
RESULTS
RESULTS
i) During early-phase on day 1, 3, and 7, the quantitation displayed no statistical significance in MMP-9 expression, between water- and FA- injected rats. ii) On day 18 post-cSCI, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-9 (p = 0.043) iii) Comparing results with MMP-2 expression and inhibition, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-2 on day 18 post cSCI (FA- and water-injected rats (p = 0.003). iv) In addition, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-2 on day 42 post-cSCI comparing FA- and water- injected rat groups (p = 0.034).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We report that FA administration results in alleviating cSCI-induced NP by inhibiting MMP-9 in the proposed mid- phase of cSCI. However, FA administration resulted in MMP-2 decline during both mid- through late- phase following cSCI. Our study elucidates a new phase of cSCI, the mid-phase. We conclude that further investigation on discovering and quantifying the nature of the mid- phase of SCI injury is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31975775
doi: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.260205
pii: 260205
pmc: PMC6894625
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
60-65Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019, Annals of Neurosciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest The authors report no conflict of interest.
Références
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Mar;320(3):1002-12
pubmed: 17167171
J Neurosci. 2002 Sep 1;22(17):7526-35
pubmed: 12196576
Ann Neurosci. 2014 Jul;21(3):97-103
pubmed: 25206073
Spine J. 2010 Dec;10(12):1049-54
pubmed: 20920894
Neurosci Lett. 1995 Dec 15;201(3):223-6
pubmed: 8786845
Brain Res. 2011 Oct 18;1418:64-9
pubmed: 21925646
Ann Neurosci. 2016 Mar;23(1):25-32
pubmed: 27536019
Dev Neurobiol. 2010 Oct;70(12):826-41
pubmed: 20629049
BMC Neurol. 2007 Jun 26;7:17
pubmed: 17594482
J Clin Invest. 2010 May;120(5):1603-16
pubmed: 20424322
Mol Pain. 2008 Sep 17;4:36
pubmed: 18799000
Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22:255-82
pubmed: 12055346
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):984-9
pubmed: 24361359
Neuroreport. 2004 Apr 9;15(5):837-9
pubmed: 15073526
J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 10;28(50):13467-77
pubmed: 19074020
Neuroreport. 2008 Feb 12;19(3):327-31
pubmed: 18303576
Ann Neurosci. 2017 May;24(2):74-81
pubmed: 28588362
Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:952906
pubmed: 22970361
Neurotherapeutics. 2011 Apr;8(2):206-20
pubmed: 21455784
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2778-82
pubmed: 17108828
Spine J. 2014 May 1;14(5):777-81
pubmed: 24239489
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 12;28(11):2892-902
pubmed: 18337420
J Neurosci Res. 2003 Oct 15;74(2):227-39
pubmed: 14515352
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 May;6(5):420-4
pubmed: 17542507
J Pain. 2006 Jan;7(1 Suppl 1):S3-S12
pubmed: 16426998
J Clin Invest. 2010 May;120(5):1383-6
pubmed: 20424316
Ann Neurol. 2004 Aug;56(2):221-7
pubmed: 15293274
Nat Med. 2008 Mar;14(3):331-6
pubmed: 18264108
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004 Oct;16(5):558-64
pubmed: 15363807
Annu Rev Nutr. 1985;5:115-41
pubmed: 3927946