How to detect high-performing individuals and groups: Decision similarity predicts accuracy.
Journal
Science advances
ISSN: 2375-2548
Titre abrégé: Sci Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101653440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
04
02
2019
accepted:
20
09
2019
entrez:
25
1
2020
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
5
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Distinguishing between high- and low-performing individuals and groups is of prime importance in a wide range of high-stakes contexts. While this is straightforward when accurate records of past performance exist, these records are unavailable in most real-world contexts. Focusing on the class of binary decision problems, we use a combined theoretical and empirical approach to develop and test a approach to this important problem. First, we use a general mathematical argument and numerical simulations to show that the similarity of an individual's decisions to others is a powerful predictor of that individual's decision accuracy. Second, testing this prediction with several large datasets on breast and skin cancer diagnostics, geopolitical forecasting, and a general knowledge task, we find that decision similarity robustly permits the identification of high-performing individuals and groups. Our findings offer a simple, yet broadly applicable, heuristic for improving real-world decision-making systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31976366
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9011
pii: aaw9011
pmc: PMC6957221
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
eaaw9011Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA154292
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).
Références
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 16;4(8):170193
pubmed: 28878973
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Feb;31(1):117-23
pubmed: 17221308
Conscious Cogn. 2014 May;26:13-23
pubmed: 24650632
Psychol Sci. 2014 May 1;25(5):1106-15
pubmed: 24659192
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):489-510
pubmed: 25844627
Science. 2010 Aug 27;329(5995):1081-5
pubmed: 20798320
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Dec 1;151(12):1346-1353
pubmed: 26501400
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 3;13(4):e0194128
pubmed: 29614070
Nature. 2017 Jan 25;541(7638):532-535
pubmed: 28128245
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Aug;107(2):276-99
pubmed: 25090129
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Apr;198(4):970-8
pubmed: 22451568
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 May;48(5):679-93
pubmed: 12734496
Med Decis Making. 1997 Jan-Mar;17(1):71-9
pubmed: 8994153
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0134269
pubmed: 26267331
Elife. 2019 Feb 13;8:
pubmed: 30758288
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 2;113(31):8777-82
pubmed: 27432950
Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):462-6
pubmed: 15486294
J R Soc Interface. 2018 May;15(142):
pubmed: 29769409
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 16;101(46):16385-9
pubmed: 15534225
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jun;202(6):W586-96
pubmed: 24848854
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 May;10(3):267-81
pubmed: 25987508
Psychol Rev. 2005 Apr;112(2):494-508
pubmed: 15783295
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22998
pubmed: 21829574