Improvement of Ab Initio Ligand Field Theory by Means of Multistate Perturbation Theory.
Journal
The journal of physical chemistry. A
ISSN: 1520-5215
Titre abrégé: J Phys Chem A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9890903
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2020
06 Feb 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
25
1
2020
entrez:
25
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Over the last few years, ab initio ligand field theory (AILFT) has evolved into an important tool for the extraction of ligand field models from ab initio calculations. The inclusion of dynamic correlation on top of complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) reference functions, which is important for accurate results, was so far realized at the level of second-order N-electron valence state perturbation theory (NEVPT2). In this work, we introduce two alternative methods for the inclusion of dynamic correlation into AILFT calculations, the second-order dynamic correlation dressed complete active space method (DCD-CAS(2)) and the Hermitian quasi-degenerate NEVPT2 (HQD-NEVPT2). These methods belong to the class of multistate perturbation theory approaches, which allow for the mixing of CASSCF states under the effect of dynamic correlation (state-mixing). The two new versions of AILFT were tested for a diverse set of transition-metal complexes. It was found that the multistate methods have, compared to NEVPT2, an AILFT fit with smaller root mean square deviations (rmsds) between ab initio and AILFT energies. A comparison of AILFT excitation energies with the experiment shows that for some systems, the agreement gets better at the multistate level because of the smaller rmsds. However, for some systems, the agreement gets worse, which could be attributed to a cancellation of errors at the NEVPT2 level that is partly removed at the multistate level. An investigation of trends in the extracted ligand field parameters shows that at the multistate level, the ligand field splitting Δ gets larger, whereas the Racah parameters
Identifiants
pubmed: 31977214
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b11227
pmc: PMC7307914
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1025-1037Références
Nat Chem. 2013 Jul;5(7):577-81
pubmed: 23787747
J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Feb 11;137(5):1993-2005
pubmed: 25588991
J Chem Phys. 2012 Nov 28;137(20):204107
pubmed: 23205981
J Chem Phys. 2010 Apr 21;132(15):154104
pubmed: 20423165
Inorg Chem. 2016 May 2;55(9):4457-69
pubmed: 27054547
J Chem Theory Comput. 2009 Sep 8;5(9):2229-38
pubmed: 26616609
Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1988 Sep 15;38(6):3098-3100
pubmed: 9900728
J Chem Phys. 2017 Dec 21;147(23):234109
pubmed: 29272949
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Feb 14;13(2):554-562
pubmed: 28005364
J Chem Theory Comput. 2008 Jun;4(6):908-19
pubmed: 26621232
Inorg Chem. 2017 Aug 7;56(15):8802-8816
pubmed: 28708410
Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1989 Jun 1;39(11):6016-6017
pubmed: 9901188
J Chem Phys. 2011 Aug 28;135(8):081106
pubmed: 21895152
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 17;7:10467
pubmed: 26883902
J Chem Phys. 2011 Jun 7;134(21):214113
pubmed: 21663350
J Chem Phys. 2014 Feb 28;140(8):081102
pubmed: 24588141
Chemistry. 2017 Mar 13;23(15):3708-3718
pubmed: 27983776
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1986 Jun 15;33(12):8822-8824
pubmed: 9938299
J Chem Phys. 2020 Jan 7;152(1):014109
pubmed: 31914736
J Comput Chem. 2011 May;32(7):1456-65
pubmed: 21370243
Inorg Chem. 2015 Oct 19;54(20):9948-61
pubmed: 26443918
Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1986 Jun;33(6):3742-3748
pubmed: 9897114
J Chem Phys. 2013 Apr 7;138(13):134108
pubmed: 23574209
J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Aug 13;9(8):3567-80
pubmed: 26584112
Chemistry. 2019 Nov 27;25(66):15112-15122
pubmed: 31496013
J Chem Phys. 2019 Mar 14;150(10):104104
pubmed: 30876352