Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: A Systematic Review.
Journal
ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
ISSN: 1538-943X
Titre abrégé: ASAIO J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9204109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
2
3
2021
entrez:
25
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and electrical storm are frequently associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring mechanical support. This study sought to review the current literature on the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for hemodynamic support during VT ablation. This was a systematic review of all published literature from 2000 to 2019 evaluating patients with VT undergoing ablation with VA-ECMO support. Studies that reported mortality, safety, and efficacy outcomes in adult (>18 years) patients were included. The primary outcome was short-term mortality (intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, or ≤30 days). The literature search identified 4,802 citations during the study period, of which seven studies comprising 867 patients met the inclusion criteria. Periprocedural VA-ECMO was used in 129 (15%) patients and all were placed peripherally. Average inducible VTs were 2-3 per procedure and ablation time varied between 34 mins and 4.7 hours. Median ages were between 61 and 68 years with 93% males. Median duration of VA-ECMO varied between 140 minutes and 6 days. Short-term mortality was 15% (19 patients), with the most frequent causes being refractory VT, cardiac arrest, and acute heart failure. All-cause mortality at the longest follow-up was 25%. Major bleeding, vascular/access complications, limb ischemia, stroke, and acute kidney injury were reported with varying frequency of 1-6%. In conclusion, VA-ECMO is used infrequently for hemodynamic support for VT ablation. Further data on patient selection, procedural optimization, and clinical outcomes are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31977352
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001125
pii: 00002480-202009000-00002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
980-985Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000135
Pays : United States
Références
Eifling M, Razavi M, Massumi A. The evaluation and management of electrical storm. Tex Heart Inst J 2011.38: 111–121.
Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, et al.; American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; American College of Radiology; American Heart Association; American Society of Echocardiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; Society of Nuclear Medicine: ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the society of cardiovascular computed tomography, the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and the society of nuclear medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009.53: 2201–2229.
Haegeli LM, Della Bella P, Brunckhorst CB. Management of a patient with electrical storm: Role of epicardial catheter ablation. Circulation 2016.133: 672–676.
Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Circulation 2018.138: e272–e391.
Virk SA, Keren A, John RM, Santageli P, Eslick A, Kumar S. Mechanical circulatory support during catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: Indications and options. Heart Lung Circ 2019.28: 134–145.
Nakahara S, Tung R, Ramirez RJ, et al. Characterization of the arrhythmogenic substrate in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy implications for catheter ablation of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010.55: 2355–2365.
De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al.; SOAP II Investigators: Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med 2010.362: 779–789.
Santangeli P, Zado ES, Supple GE, et al. Long-term outcome with catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2015.8: 1413–1421.
Bunch TJ, Mahapatra S, Madhu Reddy Y, Lakkireddy D. The role of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during ventricular tachycardia ablation. Europace 2012.14(suppl 2): ii26–ii32.
Reddy YM, Chinitz L, Mansour M, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in ventricular tachycardia ablation: Multicenter experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014.7: 244–250.
Turagam MK, Vuddanda V, Koerber S, et al. Percutaneous ventricular assist device in ventricular tachycardia ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2019.55: 197–205.
Vallabhajosyula S, Arora S, Lahewala S, et al. Temporary mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device surgery. J Am Heart Assoc 2018.7: e010193.
Vallabhajosyula S, Arora S, Sakhuja A, et al. Trends, predictors, and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support for postcardiac surgery cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 2019.123: 489–497.
Vallabhajosyula S, O’Horo JC, Antharam P, et al. Concomitant intra-aortic balloon pump use in cardiogenic shock requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018.11: e006930.
Vallabhajosyula S, Patlolla SH, Sandhyavenu H, et al. Periprocedural cardiopulmonary bypass or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018.7; e009608.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al.; STROBE Initiative: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007.4: e297.
Vallabhajosyula S, Kanmanthareddy A, Erwin PJ, Esterbrooks DJ, Morrow LE. Role of statins in delirium prevention in critical ill and cardiac surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care 2017.37: 189–196.
Vallabhajosyula S, Rayes HA, Sakhuja A, Murad MH, Geske JB, Jentzer JC. Global longitudinal strain using speckle-tracking echocardiography as a mortality predictor in sepsis: A systematic review. J Intensive Care Med 2019.34: 87–93.
Vallabhajosyula S, O’Horo JC, Antharam P, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant impella versus venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2020.66:497–503.
Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2012. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
Baratto F, Pappalardo F, Oloriz T, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for hemodynamic support of ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2016.9: e004492.
Di Monaco A, Quadrini F, Troisi F, et al. Cardiopulmonary support in patients undergoing catheter ablation of poorly tolerated ventricular arrhythmias and electrical storm. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019.30: 1281–1286.
Enriquez A, Liang J, Gentile J, et al. Outcomes of rescue cardiopulmonary support for periprocedural acute hemodynamic decompensation in patients undergoing catheter ablation of electrical storm. Heart Rhythm 2018.15: 75–80.
García Carreño J, Sousa-Casasnovas I, Vicent Alaminos ML, Atienza Fernández F, Martínez Sellés M, Fernández Avilés F. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with electrical storm: A single-center experience. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2019.72: 182–183.
Lü F, Eckman PM, Liao KK, et al. Catheter ablation of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia with mechanical circulatory support. Int J Cardiol 2013.168: 3859–3865.
Uribarri A, Bravo L, Jimenez-Candil J, Martin-Moreiras J, Villacorta E, Sanchez PL. Percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in electrical storm: Five case reports addressing efficacy, transferring allowance or radiofrequency ablation support. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2018.7: 484–489.
Zanobini M, Rossi F, Bertera A, et al. Cardiopulmonary support during electrophysiological procedures for ventricular tachycardias not haemodynamically tolerated. Perfusion 2003.18: 79–82.
Bhandary SP, Joseph N, Hofmann JP, Saranteas T, Papadimos TJ. Extracorporeal life support for refractory ventricular tachycardia. Ann Transl Med 2017.5: 73.
Mazzucotelli JP, Leprince P, Litzler PY, et al.; reflection group on mechanical circulatory support (GRAM): Results of mechanical circulatory support in France. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011.40: e112–e117.
Ostadal P, Mlcek M, Holy F, et al. Direct comparison of percutaneous circulatory support systems in specific hemodynamic conditions in a porcine model. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2012.5: 1202–1206.
Della Bella P, Baratto F, Tsiachris D, et al. Management of ventricular tachycardia in the setting of a dedicated unit for the treatment of complex ventricular arrhythmias: Long-term outcome after ablation. Circulation 2013.127: 1359–1368.
Mathuria N, Wu G, Rojas-Delgado F, et al. Outcomes of pre-emptive and rescue use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with structural heart disease undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2017.48: 27–34.
Chen CY, Tsai J, Hsu TY, et al. ECMO used in a refractory ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation patient: A National Case-Control Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016.95: e3204.
Exner DV, Pinski SL, Wyse DG, et al.; AVID Investigators. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators: Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: The antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial. Circulation 2001.103: 2066–2071.
Peichl P, Wichterle D, Pavlu L, Cihak R, Aldhoon B, Kautzner J. Complications of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: A single-center experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014.7: 684–690.
Smith A, Hardison D, Bridges B, Pietsch J. Red blood cell transfusion volume and mortality among patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion 2013.28: 54–60.
Tanaka D, Hirose H, Cavarocchi N, Entwistle JW. The impact of vascular complications on survival of patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg 2016.101: 1729–1734.
Aziz F, Brehm CE, El-Banyosy A, Han DC, Atnip RG, Reed AB. Arterial complications in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation via femoral cannulation. Ann Vasc Surg 2014.28: 178–183.
Foley PJ, Morris RJ, Woo EY, et al. Limb ischemia during femoral cannulation for cardiopulmonary support. J Vasc Surg 2010.52: 850–853.
Tung R, Boyle NG, Shivkumar K. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 2010.122: e389–e391.
Rao G, Lopez-Jimenez F, Boyd J, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; and Stroke Council: Methodological standards for meta-analyses and qualitative systematic reviews of cardiac prevention and treatment studies: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017.136: e172–e194.