Men Receive Three Times More Industry Payments than Women Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons, Even After Controlling for Confounding Variables.
Biomedical Research
/ economics
Cross-Sectional Studies
Faculty, Medical
/ economics
Female
Gender Equity
Health Care Sector
/ economics
Humans
Male
Orthopedic Surgeons
/ economics
Orthopedics
/ economics
Physicians, Women
/ economics
Research Support as Topic
/ economics
Retrospective Studies
Sex Factors
Journal
Clinical orthopaedics and related research
ISSN: 1528-1132
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0075674
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
9
2
2021
entrez:
25
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In 2016, orthopaedic surgeons received nearly USD 300 million from industry, with the top 10% of recipients making more than 95% of the total amount. The degree to which gender may be associated with industry compensation has not been well explored; however, this may be confounded by a number of variables, including academic productivity, experience, and other factors. We wished to explore the variability in payment distribution by gender after controlling for these factors. (1) Do men or women academic orthopaedic surgeons receive more payments from industry? (2) To what degree do any observed differences between the genders persist, even after accounting for identifiable factors, including academic rank, scholarly productivity, regional location of university, subspecialty selection as identified by fellowships completed, and years since completion of residency? This study was a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of surgeons practicing in orthopaedic surgery academic departments in the United States. Academic orthopaedic surgery departments were identified using the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. Publicly available data on gender, academic rank, scholarly productivity, regional location of university, fellowships completed, and years since residency graduation were collected from institutional websites. Industry funding data for 2016 were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database, and scholarly productivity data through 2017 were collected from Scopus. A total of 2939 academic orthopaedic surgeons, 2620 (89%) men and 319 (11%) women from 126 programs were identified. Men and women surgeons were different in most of the variables collected, and all except region of university were associated with differences in industry payments. The median payment for men surgeons was greater than that for women (USD 1027 [interquartile range USD 125-USD 9616] versus USD 177 [IQR USD 47-USD 1486]; difference of medians, USD 850; p < 0.001]. After accounting for potentially confounding variables like faculty rank, years since residency, H-index and subspecialty choice, women faculty members still received only 29% of payments received by otherwise comparable men orthopaedists (beta coefficient for gender = 0.29 [95% CI 0.20 to 0.44; p < 0.001]). Women academic orthopaedic surgeons received only 29% of the industry payments received by men, even after controlling for faculty rank, years since residency, H-index, and subspecialty selection. This gender-related disparity may hinder the career advancement of women orthopaedic surgeons. Increased transparency by companies can help guide orthopaedic surgeons who wish to receive industry funding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In 2016, orthopaedic surgeons received nearly USD 300 million from industry, with the top 10% of recipients making more than 95% of the total amount. The degree to which gender may be associated with industry compensation has not been well explored; however, this may be confounded by a number of variables, including academic productivity, experience, and other factors. We wished to explore the variability in payment distribution by gender after controlling for these factors.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES
(1) Do men or women academic orthopaedic surgeons receive more payments from industry? (2) To what degree do any observed differences between the genders persist, even after accounting for identifiable factors, including academic rank, scholarly productivity, regional location of university, subspecialty selection as identified by fellowships completed, and years since completion of residency?
METHODS
This study was a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of surgeons practicing in orthopaedic surgery academic departments in the United States. Academic orthopaedic surgery departments were identified using the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. Publicly available data on gender, academic rank, scholarly productivity, regional location of university, fellowships completed, and years since residency graduation were collected from institutional websites. Industry funding data for 2016 were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database, and scholarly productivity data through 2017 were collected from Scopus. A total of 2939 academic orthopaedic surgeons, 2620 (89%) men and 319 (11%) women from 126 programs were identified. Men and women surgeons were different in most of the variables collected, and all except region of university were associated with differences in industry payments.
RESULTS
The median payment for men surgeons was greater than that for women (USD 1027 [interquartile range USD 125-USD 9616] versus USD 177 [IQR USD 47-USD 1486]; difference of medians, USD 850; p < 0.001]. After accounting for potentially confounding variables like faculty rank, years since residency, H-index and subspecialty choice, women faculty members still received only 29% of payments received by otherwise comparable men orthopaedists (beta coefficient for gender = 0.29 [95% CI 0.20 to 0.44; p < 0.001]).
CONCLUSIONS
Women academic orthopaedic surgeons received only 29% of the industry payments received by men, even after controlling for faculty rank, years since residency, H-index, and subspecialty selection. This gender-related disparity may hinder the career advancement of women orthopaedic surgeons.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Increased transparency by companies can help guide orthopaedic surgeons who wish to receive industry funding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31977436
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001132
pmc: PMC7310494
pii: 00003086-202007000-00037
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1593-1599Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
American Medical Association. FRIEDA, the AMA Residency and Fellowship Database. Available at https://freida.ama-assn.org/Freida/#/. Accessed September 1, 2018.
Araujo EB, Araujo NAM, Moreira AA, Herrmann HJ, Andrade JS Jr. Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176791.
Beebe KS, Krell ES, Rynecki ND, Ippolito JA. The effect of sex on orthopaedic surgeon income. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101:e87.
Boddapati V, Sachdev R, Fu MS, Camp CL, Marx RG, Dines JS. Increasing industry support is associated with higher research productivity in orthopaedic aurgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:e36.
Campbell LG, Mehtani S, Dozier ME, Rinehart J. Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79147.
Cannada LK. Women in orthopaedic fellowships: What is their match rate, and what specialties do they choose? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1957-1961.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Open Payments Data. Available at: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov. Accessed September 2018.www.go
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The facts about open payments data: 2017. Available at: http://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/summary. Accessed June 1, 2019.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Physician and Supplier Look-Up. Available at: https://data.cms.gov. Accessed September 1, 2018.
Chang JS. The Physician Payments Sunshine Act: data evaluation regarding payments to ophthalmologists. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:656-661.
Eloy JA, Kilic S, Yoo NG, McLeod T, Svider PF, Baredes S, Folbe AJ, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Is industry funding associated with greater scholarly impact among academic neurosurgeons? World Neurosurg. 2017;103:517-525.
Eloy JA, Bobian M, Svider PF, Culver A, Siegel B, Gray ST, Baredes S, Chandrasekhar SS, Folbe AJ. Association of gender with financial relationships between industry and academic otolaryngologists. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143:796-802.
Garstka ME, Monlezun D, DuCoin C, Killackey M, Kandil E. The Sunshine Act and Surgeons: a nation-wide analysis of industry payments to physicians. J Surg Res. 2019;233:41-49.
Lieber AM, Kirchner GJ, Zavras AG, Kerbel YE, Khalsa AS. Industry consulting payments to orthopedic surgeons are associated with increased publications. Orthopedics. 2019;42:137-142.
Ngaage LM, Harris C, Gao C, Puthumana J, Crabill GA, Baglien B, Wu Y, Rosen C, Rada EM, Groves M, Sansur CA, Rasko YM. Investigating the gender pay gap in industry contributions to academic neurosurgeons. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:516-522 e1.
Ngaage LM, Harris C, Rosen C, Ge S, Kim C, Rada EM, Manahan M, Silverman RP, Slezak S, Rasko YM. Sex disparity in academic rank and industry payments to plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg. [Published online ahead of pring October 15, 2019]. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001989.
Poon S, Kiridly D, Mutawakkil M, Wendolowski S, Gecelter R, Kline M, Lane LB. Current trends in sex, race, and ethnic diversity in orthopaedic surgery residency. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27:e725-e733.
Rathi VK, Samuel AM, Mehra S. Industry ties in otolaryngology: initial insights from the physician payment sunshine act. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152:993-999.
Rose SL, Sanghani RM, Schmidt C, Karafa MT, Kodish E, Chisolm GM. Gender differences in physicians' financial ties to industry: a study of national disclosure data. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129197.
Samuel AM, Webb ML, Lukasiewicz AM, Bohl DD, Basques BA, Russo GS, Rathi VK, Grauer JN. Orthopaedic surgeons receive the most industry payments to physicians but large disparities are seen in Sunshine Act data. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3297-3306.
Scopus. Search for an author profile. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/freelookup/form/author.uri. Accessed September 1, 2018.
Teplitsky S, Perez T, Leong JY, Xie K, Murphy A, Shenot PJ. Industry payments to female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeons: an analysis of Sunshine Act open payments from 2014-2017. Int Urogynecol J. [Published online ahead of print October 31, 2019]. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04098-2.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04098-2
Weiss A, Parina R, Tapia VJ, Sood D, Lee KC, Horgan S, Freischlag JA, Blair SL, Ramamoorthy SL. Assessing the domino effect: Female physician industry payments fall short, parallel gender inequalities in medicine. Am J Surg. 2018;216:723-729.
Weng JK, Valle LF, Nam GE, Chu FI, Steinberg ML, Raldow AC. Evaluation of sex distribution of industry payments among radiation oncologists. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e187377.