Three-Dimensional Measurement of Maxillary Involvement in Hemifacial Microsomia in Children.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
11
7
2020
entrez:
25
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In hemifacial microsomia (HFM), the aberrant mandible structure has always been the focus of attention. How the maxillary development being affected is not clear. The authors sought to comprehensively evaluate the hemifacial maxillary deficiency and to assess for Pruzansky-Kaban score correlation.This is a retrospective research of children with HFM. Demographic information were recorded, and computed tomographic scan were reconstructed and analyzed by segmentation, volumetric and cephalometric measurements. Analyses involved paired t-test, independent sample t-test and one-way analyses of variance.Demographic information revealed 67 patients diagnosed with HFM were included: 10.4 percent type I, 38.8 percent IIa, 28.4 percent type IIb, 22.4 percent type III. The maxillary total volume was found to be significantly decreased on the affected side in patients with type IIa (P = 0.0426) and IIb (P = 0.0004). No notable differences in maxillary sinus volume were found. No significant differences in maxillary width measurements were found between groups type I and III. A descending trend in maxillary bone volume ratio, an increasing trend in maxillary posterior width ratio and a decreasing trend in maxillary middle height ratio was observed from group I to IIb (pmbv* = 0.020; pmpw* = 0.002; pmmh* = 0.004).This study comprehensively characterized the hemifacial microsomia maxillary deficiency. For maxillary total volume and transverse development, the type III group presented characteristics similar to the type I group. We concluded that the severity of maxillary deficiency is not completely consistent with the mandibular deformity classification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31977703
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006200
pii: 00001665-202004000-00032
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
444-447Références
Gorlin RJ. Deformations and disruptions. In: Syndromes of the Head and Neck. Vol. 1, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 1990.
Steinbacher DM, Gougoutas A, Bartlett SP. An analysis of mandibular volume in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127:2407–2412.
Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE. Three-dimensional approach to analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Cleft palate J 1981; 18:90–99.
Johnston MC, Bronsky PT. Animal models for human craniofacial malformations. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1991; 11:277–291.
Kelberman D, Tyson J, Chandler DC, et al. Hemifacial microsomia: progress in understanding the genetic basis of a complex malformation syndrome. Hum Genet 2001; 109:638–645.
Poswillo D. The pathogenesis of the first and second branchial arch syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 35:302–328.
Gilbert SF. Developmental Biology. 8th ed.Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2006.
Scuderi AJ, Harnsberger HR, Boyer RS. Pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses: normal features of importance to the accurate interpretation of CT scans and MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160:1101–1104.
Brandstetter KA, Patel KG. Craniofacial Microsomia. Fac Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24:495–515.
Emodi O, Israel Y, Almos ME, et al. Three-dimensional planning and reconstruction of the mandible in children with craniofacial microsomia Type III Using Costochondral Grafts. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2017; 7:64–72.
Cleveland EC, Zampell J, Avraham T, et al. Reconstruction of congenital mandibular hypoplasia with microvascular free fibula flaps in the pediatric population: a paradigm shift. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28:79–83.
Molina F. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a clinical experience of the last 17 years. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20: (Suppl 2): 1794–1800.
Wink JD, Paliga JT, Tahiri Y, et al. Maxillary involvement in hemifacial microsomia: an objective three-dimensional analysis of the craniofacial skeleton. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25:1236–1240.
Song SY, Hong JW, Roh TS, et al. Volume and distances of the maxillary sinus in craniofacial deformities with midfacial hypoplasia. Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2009; 141:614–620.
Shibazaki-Yorozuya R, Yamada A, Nagata S, et al. Three-dimensional longitudinal changes in craniofacial growth in untreated hemifacial microsomia patients with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthop 2014; 145:579–594.
Pruzansky S. Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike. Birth Defects 1969; 5:120–129.
Kaban LB, Moses MH, Mulliken JB. Correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child: a follow-up study. Cleft Palate J 1986; 23: (Suppl 1): 50–52.
Padwa BL, Mulliken JB, Maghen A, et al. Midfacial growth after costochondral graft construction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56:122–127. discussion 127–128.
Murray JE, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB. Analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74:186–199.
Hofmann E, Detterbeck A, Chepura T, et al. Oculoauriculovertebral spectrum and maxillary sinus volumes: CT-based comparative evaluation. J Orofac Orthop 2018; 79:259–266.
Su H, Han B, Li S, et al. Compensation trends of the angulation of first molars: retrospective study of 1403 malocclusion cases. Int J Oral Sci 2014; 6:175–181.
Tadros M, Brook AH, Ranjitkar S, et al. Compensatory interactions between developing maxillary anterior teeth in a sample of twins. Arch Oral Biol 2019; 97:198–207.
Kaban LB. Mandibular asymmetry and the fourth dimension. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20: (Suppl 1): 622–631.