Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 for dose-finding in EGFR positive and locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC subjects who need Afatinib therapy: Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT Compliant).
Adult
Afatinib
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Boswellia
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Cordyceps
Double-Blind Method
Drug Combinations
ErbB Receptors
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Medicine, Korean Traditional
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Panax
Plant Extracts
/ administration & dosage
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
entrez:
25
1
2020
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
1
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In recent studies, afatinib, a second-generation inhibitor, showed superior outcomes, when compared to the first-generation of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as erlotinib and gefitinib, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Patients who receive TKIs with a significant initial efficacy, inevitably experience an acquired resistance (AR) within 9 to 13 months. Traditional Korean medicine may have synergistic effects when combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The purpose of this trial is to assess whether afatinib plus HAD-B1 improves disease control rates (DCRs) compared with afatinib alone and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 for finding the proper dose. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, therapeutic, exploratory clinical trial. This trial is designed to determine whether HAD-B1 combined with afatinib results in better DCRs with less toxicity than afatinib alone. A total of 66 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations will be randomly assigned to treatment group 1 (afatinib 40 mg/day plus HAD-B1 972 mg), treatment group 2 (afatinib 40 mg/day plus HAD-B1 1944 mg) and a control group (afatinib 40 mg/day). Afatinib combined with HAD-B1 or with a placebo will be administered to the participants for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is a comparison of the DCRs among groups. Secondary endpoints are comparisons of the complete response (CR) and the partial response (PR) to the treatment, the stability of the disease (SD), progression free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor marker (CEA, NSE) and WBC differential count (LMR, NLR) and natural killer cell activity and quality of life (QOL) among groups. The results from this clinical trial will provide evidence of efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 in EGFR positive and locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients who need afatinib therapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In recent studies, afatinib, a second-generation inhibitor, showed superior outcomes, when compared to the first-generation of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as erlotinib and gefitinib, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Patients who receive TKIs with a significant initial efficacy, inevitably experience an acquired resistance (AR) within 9 to 13 months. Traditional Korean medicine may have synergistic effects when combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The purpose of this trial is to assess whether afatinib plus HAD-B1 improves disease control rates (DCRs) compared with afatinib alone and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 for finding the proper dose.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, therapeutic, exploratory clinical trial. This trial is designed to determine whether HAD-B1 combined with afatinib results in better DCRs with less toxicity than afatinib alone. A total of 66 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations will be randomly assigned to treatment group 1 (afatinib 40 mg/day plus HAD-B1 972 mg), treatment group 2 (afatinib 40 mg/day plus HAD-B1 1944 mg) and a control group (afatinib 40 mg/day). Afatinib combined with HAD-B1 or with a placebo will be administered to the participants for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is a comparison of the DCRs among groups. Secondary endpoints are comparisons of the complete response (CR) and the partial response (PR) to the treatment, the stability of the disease (SD), progression free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor marker (CEA, NSE) and WBC differential count (LMR, NLR) and natural killer cell activity and quality of life (QOL) among groups.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The results from this clinical trial will provide evidence of efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 in EGFR positive and locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients who need afatinib therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31977865
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018735
pii: 00005792-202001240-00024
pmc: PMC7004641
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drug Combinations
0
Plant Extracts
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Afatinib
41UD74L59M
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e18735Références
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57604
pubmed: 23469033
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):577-89
pubmed: 27083334
Curr Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(4):e269-e276
pubmed: 28874897
Lung Cancer. 2013 Aug;81(2):155-61
pubmed: 23664448
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Feb;11(2):121-8
pubmed: 20022809
J Integr Med. 2014 Jul;12(4):346-58
pubmed: 25074884
Integr Cancer Ther. 2016 Dec;15(4):467-477
pubmed: 27151594
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012 Oct 1;10(10):1236-71
pubmed: 23054877
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):897-907
pubmed: 26156651
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):239-46
pubmed: 22285168
Ann Transl Med. 2015 May;3(7):96
pubmed: 26015938
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2442-9
pubmed: 18458038
Oncogene. 2008 Aug 7;27(34):4702-11
pubmed: 18408761
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30
pubmed: 28055103
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012 Nov;343(2):342-50
pubmed: 22888144
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51
pubmed: 25589191