[Does the FLOT regimen a new standard of perioperative chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer?]
Le protocole FLOT est-il le nouveau standard de chimiothérapie péri-opératoire des cancers de l’estomac ?
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Capecitabine
/ administration & dosage
Cisplatin
/ administration & dosage
Disease-Free Survival
Docetaxel
/ administration & dosage
Epirubicin
/ administration & dosage
Fluorouracil
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Leucovorin
/ administration & dosage
Oxaliplatin
/ administration & dosage
Perioperative Care
/ methods
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stomach Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Cancer de l’estomac
Chimiothérapie péri-opératoire
Docetaxel
Docétaxel
Gastric cancer
Perioperative chemotherapy
Journal
Bulletin du cancer
ISSN: 1769-6917
Titre abrégé: Bull Cancer
Pays: France
ID NLM: 0072416
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
19
12
2019
revised:
22
12
2019
accepted:
26
12
2019
pubmed:
26
1
2020
medline:
20
2
2020
entrez:
26
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
FLOT-4 study recently reports that in patients with gastric cancer, perioperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracile, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT regimen) increases survival over standard ECF/ECX regimen (epirubicine, cisplatine and 5-fluorouracile [or capecitabine]). Does this study, make FLOT a new standard of perioperative chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer? Seven hundred and sixteen patients were included into that randomized study. Thirty seven per cent and 46% of the patients received the full planned treatment in the ECF/ECX group and in the FLOT group, respectively. The primary aim of FLOT-4 was met as FLOT significantly reduced the relative risk of death vs. ECF/ECX (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.94; P=0.012). Median survival is increased by 15 months with FLOT (50 months vs. 35 months). FLOT also provided better complete resection rates, better complete pathological response rates, and better disease-free survival than ECF/ECX. FLOT is more likely associated with the following adverse events: diarrheas, leuco-neutropenia (including 51% of severe ones), infections (including 18% of severe ones), and peripheral neuropathy. On the contrary, ECF/ECX provided more likely severe nausea and vomiting, severe anemia, and thromboembolic events. Overall, the number of patients with related serious adverse events (including those that occurred during hospital stay for surgery) was similar in the two groups, as was the number of toxic deaths and postoperative deaths. FLOT should be regarded as the recommended perioperative chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer or adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction. However, some doubts remain as regards of its use in the daily practice for unselected patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31980145
pii: S0007-4551(20)30002-3
doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.12.005
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxaliplatin
04ZR38536J
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
Epirubicin
3Z8479ZZ5X
Capecitabine
6804DJ8Z9U
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
fre
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
54-60Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.