Understanding sex differences in cognitive insight across first-and-multiple episode psychosis.
BCIS
Insight
Psychosis
Schizophrenia
Self-certainty
Sex differences
Journal
Schizophrenia research
ISSN: 1573-2509
Titre abrégé: Schizophr Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8804207
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
12
07
2019
revised:
19
11
2019
accepted:
20
12
2019
pubmed:
26
1
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
26
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cognitive insight represents the capacity to self-reflect and consider external feedback when re-evaluating faulty beliefs. It is associated with specific cognitive capacities such as verbal memory, of which there is substantial evidence for sex differences in psychotic disorders. Like more general cognitive capacities, cognitive insight might too be modulated by sex differences. One hundred and seventy-one first episode psychosis (FEP; 123 males, 48 females), and 203 multiple episode psychosis (MEP; 147 males, 56 females) participants completed the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS). A two-way MANOVA was conducted on the three BCIS measures (self-reflectiveness, self-certainty, composite index) with sex (male, female) and illness stage (FEP, MEP) as factors, followed by two-way ANOVAs and a post hoc test of simple effects. The only significant interaction to emerge was between sex and illness stage in self-certainty (F(1, 373) = 5.88, p = .016). A test of simple effects revealed that self-certainty group means were significantly different for males and females in FEP, where females had lower self-certainty than males (p = .053) but not during MEP (p = .119). Sex differences do not modulate cognitive insight in MEP, which may be attributable to females having greater positive symptom severity than males. In FEP however, results revealed that females were significantly less self-certain than males. Lower self-certainty relative to self-reflectiveness predicts treatment response in psychological interventions, and as such future FEP studies should explore sex differences in psychological interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31980343
pii: S0920-9964(19)30594-8
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.12.024
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
276-282Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 68961
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 106634
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest M.L. reports grants work from Otsuka Lundbeck Alliance, personal fees from Otsuka Canada, Lundbeck Canada, and MedAvante-Prophase, and grants and personal fees from Janssen. R.J. reports grants, speaker's and consultant's honoraria from Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shire, Perdue, HLS and Myelin, and royalties from Henry Stewart Talks. A.M. reports research funding for an investigator-initiated project from BMS Canada and honoraria for lectures and consulting activities (e.g. advisory board participation) with Otsuka and Lundbeck. Grants, personal fees, and honoraria for all authors are unrelated to the present article.