The single-suture technique for anterior cruciate ligament graft preparation provides similar stability as a three-suture technique: a biomechanical in vitro study in a porcine model.
ACL reconstruction
Anterior cruciate ligament
Arthroscopy
Biomechanics
Hamstring graft
Patient safety
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
23
07
2019
pubmed:
26
1
2020
medline:
9
9
2020
entrez:
26
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Numerous techniques have been described for the tibial-sided graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The use of less suture material for graft preparation is thought to improve ingrowth and to reduce the risk for infection. At the same time, the suture construct should be strong enough to resist the surgeon's pull during tensioning of the transplant. In total, 39 fresh-frozen procine deep flexor tendons were used and prepared as four-strand grafts. In the three-suture group (n = 19), graft preparation was performed using three tibial-sided sutures, with each tendon end sutured separately. In the one-suture group (n = 20), a modified graft preparation using only one tibial-sided suture was applied. Each sample underwent load-to-failure testing (N The biomechanical testing of the two different suture constructs showed a significantly higher load-to-failure for the three-suture group (711 N ± 91 N) compared to the one-suture group (347 N ± 24 N) (p = 0.0001). In both groups, the mode of failure was a tear of the suture in all samples. A failure of the suture-tendon interface was not observed in any case. The median maximal tension force on the construct applied by the 26 volunteers was 134 N (range 73-182 N). The presented single-suture tendon graft preparation resisted to smaller failure loads than the conventional three-suture technique. However, no failures in the suture-tendon interface were seen and the failure loads observed were far beyond the tension forces that can be expected intraoperatively. Hence, the single-suture graft preparation technique may be a valuable alternative to the conventional technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31980876
doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03350-5
pii: 10.1007/s00402-020-03350-5
pmc: PMC7109177
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
511-516Références
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Jan;139(1):73-78
pubmed: 30039308
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jun;27(6):834-8
pubmed: 21624678
Z Orthop Unfall. 2017 Jun;155(3):340-343
pubmed: 28423436
Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug;26(8):1105-10
pubmed: 20678709
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):635-40
pubmed: 15090378
Arthroscopy. 2010 Dec;26(12):1662-6
pubmed: 20926231
Arthrosc Tech. 2012 Aug 31;1(2):e165-8
pubmed: 23766990
Arthroscopy. 2008 May;24(5):599-603
pubmed: 18442694
Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec;30(12):1609-15
pubmed: 25174535
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Sep;33(9):717-21
pubmed: 22995257
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jan;138(1):139-145
pubmed: 29134318
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1641-5
pubmed: 22691458
Arthrosc Tech. 2014 May 12;3(3):e321-4
pubmed: 25126495
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Dec;26(12):3690-3698
pubmed: 29687166
Arthroscopy. 2009 Feb;25(2):200-7
pubmed: 19171281
Musculoskelet Surg. 2014 Dec;98(3):179-87
pubmed: 25269758
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1380-5
pubmed: 25767269
Arthroscopy. 2007 Mar;23(3):326.e1-3
pubmed: 17349483
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Sep;24(9):2983-2989
pubmed: 25894752
Int Orthop. 2013 Feb;37(2):279-84
pubmed: 23307016
J Exp Orthop. 2018 Jun 15;5(1):20
pubmed: 29904897
Med Eng Phys. 2012 Nov;34(9):1221-7
pubmed: 22297087
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Oct;136(10):1465-71
pubmed: 27475640
Open Access J Sports Med. 2016 Feb 24;7:21-32
pubmed: 26955296
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):634-647
pubmed: 28939947
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Dec;135(12):1733-41
pubmed: 26391988
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Nov;136(11):1595-1600
pubmed: 27498103
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015 Oct;3(4):220-40
pubmed: 26550585