Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Alignment in Middle-Aged and Older Men and Women in the Natural and Erect Sitting Positions: A Prospective Study in a Chinese Population.
Journal
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research
ISSN: 1643-3750
Titre abrégé: Med Sci Monit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9609063
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jan 2020
25 Jan 2020
Historique:
entrez:
26
1
2020
pubmed:
26
1
2020
medline:
4
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND This prospective study aimed to compare the sagittal spinopelvic parameters in the erect and natural sitting positions in healthy middle-aged and older men and women in a Chinese population. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ninety healthy middle-aged and older men and women underwent lateral whole spinal radiography in the natural and erect sitting positions. The radiographic sagittal spinopelvic parameters were measured. They included the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), the T1 pelvic angle (TPA), the pelvic incidence (PI), the pelvic tilt (PT), the sacral slope (SS), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), the T1 slope (T1S), cervical lordosis (CL), and lumbar lordosis (LL). RESULTS In the natural sitting position, LL decreased by 14.5°, TK and TLK increased by 3.2° and 2.5°, respectively, PT increased by 10.3°, T1S increased by 6.9°, and CL increased by 3.4° compared with the erect position. In the natural sitting position, the mean forward-moving SVA was 33.4 mm, and the C2-C7 SVA was 6.1 mm. Men had a larger LL and smaller PT than the women when sitting in the erect position, and a greater TK, T1S, and C2-C7 SVA than women when sitting in the natural position. CONCLUSIONS In the natural sitting position, a reduction in LL was associated with TK, SVA and PT increased, and there were differences between men and women. The characteristics of spinopelvic alignment in healthy older adults should be considered when planning corrective spinal surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31981456
pii: 919441
doi: 10.12659/MSM.919441
pmc: PMC6995246
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e919441Références
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Jul;24 Suppl 1:S11-20
pubmed: 24816823
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Mar;34(2):202-7
pubmed: 23965915
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 01;15:318
pubmed: 25884916
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Nov;17(6):682-6
pubmed: 22915074
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3675-3686
pubmed: 27432430
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Mar;28(3):E1
pubmed: 20192655
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):1077-82
pubmed: 22045006
Eur Spine J. 2000 Feb;9(1):47-55
pubmed: 10766077
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Nov;21(6):713-717
pubmed: 27464715
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 15;35(2):138-45
pubmed: 20081508
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Dec 1;41(23):1826-1836
pubmed: 27111763
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jan;24(1):3-11
pubmed: 25218732
Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Sep;10(3):322-327
pubmed: 30174808
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1828-33
pubmed: 19644334
Eur Spine J. 2019 Oct 19;:
pubmed: 31630266
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):62-8
pubmed: 26689395
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 15;35(22):E1193-8
pubmed: 20959772
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Feb;24(1):114-9
pubmed: 24295543
Cogent Eng. 2018 Mar 02;5(1):1442109
pubmed: 30023408
Spine J. 2017 Jun;17(6):799-806
pubmed: 27063999
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Jul-Aug;7(4):355-9
pubmed: 6215719
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981 Jan-Feb;6(1):93-7
pubmed: 7209680
Health Rep. 2011 Mar;22(1):7-14
pubmed: 21510585
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Jun;159(6):1119-1128
pubmed: 28185071
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Oct 22;2:845-53
pubmed: 26844159
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Feb 27;9(1):11
pubmed: 24571953
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct;29(4):414-421
pubmed: 29979136
Spine J. 2017 Feb;17(2):183-189
pubmed: 27562103