Comparison of mid-term outcomes of endovascular repair and medical management in patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.
Acute Disease
Adult
Aged
Aortic Dissection
/ drug therapy
Antihypertensive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
/ drug therapy
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
/ methods
Endovascular Procedures
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Propensity Score
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
aortic dissection
endovascular procedures
outcomes
Journal
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-685X
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
08
07
2019
revised:
18
11
2019
accepted:
28
11
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2020
medline:
13
7
2021
entrez:
27
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To further assess the early and mid-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) compared with those receiving best medical treatment (BMT). Between February 2008 and March 2018, 357 consecutive patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 191 patients underwent TEVAR, and 166 received BMT. After propensity score matching, we obtained 145 matched pairs for analysis. In the matched population, the 30-day mortality between the TEVAR group and the BMT group showed no statistically significant difference, whereas the early adverse events rates in the TEVAR group were significantly greater than that of the BMT group (P = .003). Freedom from all-cause mortality in the TEVAR group was significantly greater than that of the BMT group (TEVAR: 91.9% at 5 years, BMT: 82.2% at 5 years, P = .028). Freedom from aortic-related mortality in the TEVAR group was significantly greater than that of the BMT group (TEVAR: 94.1% at 5 years, BMT: 86.1% at 5 years, P = .044). Multivariable Cox-hazard regression analysis demonstrated that the older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.08, P = .013), BMT (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.08-5.05, P = .032), and the distance between the primary entry tear and the left subclavian artery <2.0 cm (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.06-4.99, P = .035) were the significant risk factors for all-cause death. Given death as a competing factor, the cumulative incidence of rupture in the BMT group was significantly greater than that of the TEVAR group (BMT: 13.7% at 5 years, TEVAR: 5.1% at 5 years, P = .024). Despite more complications in the early stage, TEVAR was associated with decreased risk of late death and had fewer late aortic ruptures compared with BMT in patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD. Therefore, TEVAR may be considered as the first option to improve the late outcomes in these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31982125
pii: S0022-5223(19)40469-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.127
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
26-36.e1Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.