Comparison of the Effects of Secukinumab and Adalimumab Biosimilar on Radiographic Progression in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Design of a Randomized, Phase IIIb Study (SURPASS).
Adalimumab
/ administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ administration & dosage
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
/ administration & dosage
Disease Progression
Humans
Interleukin-17
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiography
Spondylitis, Ankylosing
/ drug therapy
Journal
Clinical drug investigation
ISSN: 1179-1918
Titre abrégé: Clin Drug Investig
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 9504817
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
27
1
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
entrez:
27
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Secukinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-17A monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated low radiographic progression over 4 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). An adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor [TNF] inhibitor) biosimilar, GP2017 (SDZ-ADL; Sandoz), has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (July 2018) for use in all same indications as adalimumab, including AS. Adalimumab has also shown low long-term radiographic progression in patients with AS. Direct comparison of radiographic progression in AS between IL-17A and TNF inhibitors has not been studied. SURPASS is the first head-to-head, Phase IIIb, randomized, biologic-controlled study in AS to compare effects of secukinumab versus SDZ-ADL on spinal radiographic progression. Overall, 858 biologic-naïve patients with AS with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥ 5 mg/L) and/or at least one syndesmophyte in the cervical/lumbar spine at baseline (without total ankylosis) were randomized (1:1:1) to subcutaneous (sc) secukinumab (300 or 150 mg) or SDZ-ADL (40 mg). Secukinumab will be administered at baseline, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, and then every 4 weeks until week 100. SDZ-ADL will be administered every 2 weeks from baseline until week 102. Patients and investigators will be unblinded to drug but blinded to secukinumab doses. Spinal X-rays will be obtained at baseline, and weeks 52 and 104, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) X-rays at baseline and week 104, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of SIJs and spine at baseline, weeks 16, 52, and 104. The primary endpoint is to demonstrate superiority of secukinumab (300 or 150 mg) treatment versus SDZ-ADL regarding proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (change from baseline in modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score [mSASSS] ≤ 0.5) at week 104. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in mSASSS, proportion of patients with syndesmophyte at baseline who develop no new syndesmophytes, reduction of osteitis on MRI of SIJs and spine (Berlin method). Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 20/40 responses, ASAS partial remission, and AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (ASDAS < 1.3) in secukinumab- versus SDZ-ADL-treated patients at week 104. This is the first study designed to evaluate superiority of an IL-17A inhibitor, secukinumab, over a TNF inhibitor, SDZ-ADL, in reducing spinal radiographic progression in AS. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03259074.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Secukinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-17A monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated low radiographic progression over 4 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). An adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor [TNF] inhibitor) biosimilar, GP2017 (SDZ-ADL; Sandoz), has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (July 2018) for use in all same indications as adalimumab, including AS. Adalimumab has also shown low long-term radiographic progression in patients with AS. Direct comparison of radiographic progression in AS between IL-17A and TNF inhibitors has not been studied. SURPASS is the first head-to-head, Phase IIIb, randomized, biologic-controlled study in AS to compare effects of secukinumab versus SDZ-ADL on spinal radiographic progression.
METHODS
METHODS
Overall, 858 biologic-naïve patients with AS with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥ 5 mg/L) and/or at least one syndesmophyte in the cervical/lumbar spine at baseline (without total ankylosis) were randomized (1:1:1) to subcutaneous (sc) secukinumab (300 or 150 mg) or SDZ-ADL (40 mg). Secukinumab will be administered at baseline, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, and then every 4 weeks until week 100. SDZ-ADL will be administered every 2 weeks from baseline until week 102. Patients and investigators will be unblinded to drug but blinded to secukinumab doses. Spinal X-rays will be obtained at baseline, and weeks 52 and 104, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) X-rays at baseline and week 104, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of SIJs and spine at baseline, weeks 16, 52, and 104. The primary endpoint is to demonstrate superiority of secukinumab (300 or 150 mg) treatment versus SDZ-ADL regarding proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (change from baseline in modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score [mSASSS] ≤ 0.5) at week 104. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in mSASSS, proportion of patients with syndesmophyte at baseline who develop no new syndesmophytes, reduction of osteitis on MRI of SIJs and spine (Berlin method). Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 20/40 responses, ASAS partial remission, and AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (ASDAS < 1.3) in secukinumab- versus SDZ-ADL-treated patients at week 104.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study designed to evaluate superiority of an IL-17A inhibitor, secukinumab, over a TNF inhibitor, SDZ-ADL, in reducing spinal radiographic progression in AS.
STUDY REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03259074.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31983056
doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00886-7
pii: 10.1007/s40261-020-00886-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
0
GP2017
0
IL17A protein, human
0
Interleukin-17
0
secukinumab
DLG4EML025
Adalimumab
FYS6T7F842
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03259074']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
269-278Références
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74
pubmed: 9095563
Lancet. 2015 Sep 19;386(9999):1137-46
pubmed: 26135703
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Oct;71(10):1623-9
pubmed: 22532639
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jun 15;61(6):764-71
pubmed: 19479705
Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1705-13
pubmed: 24035250
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 May 1;58(5):859-868
pubmed: 30590813
J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281-5
pubmed: 7699629
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Jun;52(6):1756-65
pubmed: 15934081
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;11(7):415-29
pubmed: 25907700
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):1070-1077
pubmed: 27965257
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65
pubmed: 10146874
J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91
pubmed: 7699630
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 May;64(5):1388-98
pubmed: 22127957
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):282-98
pubmed: 26401991
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jul;66(7):910-5
pubmed: 17329306
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Feb;75(2):408-12
pubmed: 26248638
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2534-48
pubmed: 26699169
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Mar 1;58(3):388-400
pubmed: 29860356
J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1349-54
pubmed: 21459937
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;44(8):1876-86
pubmed: 11508441
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016 Nov;42(4):663-678
pubmed: 27742020
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Jun;24(3):363-71
pubmed: 20534370
J Rheumatol. 2004 Jan;31(1):125-32
pubmed: 14705231
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct;58(10):3063-70
pubmed: 18821688
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jan;62(1):20-6
pubmed: 12480664
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jan;60(1):93-102
pubmed: 19116919
J Rheumatol. 2005 Oct;32(10):2048-9
pubmed: 16206368
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):47-53
pubmed: 21068095
RMD Open. 2017 Dec 28;3(2):e000592
pubmed: 29435364
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2007 Dec;51(4):249-60
pubmed: 18060011
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jul;69(7):1011-1019
pubmed: 27696754
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1329-39
pubmed: 26422723
J Rheumatol. 2009 May;36(5):997-1002
pubmed: 19332632
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;63(8):2215-25
pubmed: 21484769
Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(5):R104
pubmed: 18761747
Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Dec 22;19(1):285
pubmed: 29273067
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014 Mar;26(2):145-50
pubmed: 24389865
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1455-61
pubmed: 24812292
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0177231
pubmed: 28640818
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Aug;75(8):1438-43
pubmed: 26242443
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May;58(5):1324-31
pubmed: 18438853
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jul;69(7):1020-1029
pubmed: 28235249
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 24;371(4):326-38
pubmed: 25007392
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0122693
pubmed: 25879956
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug;50(8):2622-32
pubmed: 15334477
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R127
pubmed: 19703304
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):978-991
pubmed: 28087505
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):127-9
pubmed: 15051621