Comparing the impact of future cropland expansion on global biodiversity and carbon storage across models and scenarios.
biodiversity
carbon storage
integrated models
land-use change
Journal
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2970
Titre abrégé: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503623
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 03 2020
16 03 2020
Historique:
entrez:
28
1
2020
pubmed:
28
1
2020
medline:
21
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Land-use change is a direct driver of biodiversity and carbon storage loss. Projections of future land use often include notable expansion of cropland areas in response to changes in climate and food demand, although there are large uncertainties in results between models and scenarios. This study examines these uncertainties by comparing three different socio-economic scenarios (SSP1-3) across three models (IMAGE, GLOBIOM and PLUMv2). It assesses the impacts on biodiversity metrics and direct carbon loss from biomass and soil as a direct consequence of cropland expansion. Results show substantial variation between models and scenarios, with little overlap across all nine projections. Although SSP1 projects the least impact, there are still significant impacts projected. IMAGE and GLOBIOM project the greatest impact across carbon storage and biodiversity metrics due to both extent and location of cropland expansion. Furthermore, for all the biodiversity and carbon metrics used, there is a greater proportion of variance explained by the model used. This demonstrates the importance of improving the accuracy of land-based models. Incorporating effects of land-use change in biodiversity impact assessments would also help better prioritize future protection of biodiverse and carbon-rich areas. This article is part of the theme issue 'Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions'.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31983336
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0189
pmc: PMC7017773
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4784592']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20190189Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/M010996/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 22;13(3):e0194695
pubmed: 29566091
Science. 2014 May 30;344(6187):1246752
pubmed: 24876501
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):2791-2809
pubmed: 29485759
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 9;110(28):E2602-10
pubmed: 23803854
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 29;114(35):9326-9331
pubmed: 28811375
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 May 13;376(2119):
pubmed: 29610386
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19645-8
pubmed: 21041633
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Dec;24(12):5895-5908
pubmed: 30267559
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8650-5
pubmed: 20421467
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e72590
pubmed: 23991125
Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):37-42
pubmed: 12511946
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Mar;21(3):1236-48
pubmed: 25205590
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 20;102(51):18497-501
pubmed: 16344485
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):3967-3983
pubmed: 27135635
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):843-5
pubmed: 10706267
Bioessays. 2000 Dec;22(12):1123-33
pubmed: 11084628
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4
pubmed: 16040698
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Feb;23(2):767-781
pubmed: 27474896
Nature. 2011 Oct 12;478(7369):337-42
pubmed: 21993620
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8
pubmed: 20110467
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 27;366(1578):2693-702
pubmed: 21844048
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
pubmed: 10706275
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2505-15
pubmed: 26950650